欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 8-16.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202401.028

• 高寒草甸草原退化机理与生态修复专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

高寒草甸矮生嵩草不同根序解剖结构对生境干旱化的响应

韩雨圳,陈凤林,杨春娇,张大才*   

  1. (西南林业大学西南地区生物多样性保育国家林业和草原局重点实验室, 昆明 650224)
  • 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-08

Responses of anatomical structures of different root orders of Kobresia humilis to habitat aridification in an alpine meadow.

HAN Yuzhen, CHEN Fenglin, YANG Chunjiao, ZHANG Dacai*   

  1. (Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Biodiversity Conservation in Southwest China, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China).

  • Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-08

摘要: 植物根系由不同根序组成,然而,它们的解剖结构对生境干旱化的响应是否一致尚不清楚。本研究于藏东南东达山矮生嵩草(Kobresia humilis)高寒草甸沿生境干旱化梯度设置6个样方,采集矮生嵩草根系。采用石蜡切片法,运用方差分析和主成分分析,比较不同土壤水分生境中矮生嵩草一、二级根序解剖结构的差异及可塑性强弱。结果表明:一、二级根序间解剖结构组成无明显差异,其中横切面表皮细胞近似长方形,排列紧密,面积较大(87.6~126.0 μm2);一、二级根序解剖结构对生境干旱化的响应不一致,一级根中表皮细胞面积和厚度、皮层厚度(含厚壁组织与薄壁组织)均与土壤含水率呈显著负相关,而二级根呈显著正相关(P<0.05);一级根表皮占径比在土壤水分梯度间的差异显著,其他解剖结构差异不显著,二级根解剖结构(除皮层厚壁组织外)的占径比在土壤水分梯度间均存在显著差异;一级根皮层薄壁组织厚度可塑性最强,皮层厚壁组织厚度可塑性最弱;二级根横切面面积可塑性最强,中柱面积可塑性最弱。总之,矮生嵩草根系表皮、皮层解剖结构对土壤水分梯度变化的可塑性强,但不同根序解剖结构对生境干旱化的响应机制不同,表现出其潜在的储水能力或吸水能力,根序法为研究根系的生境适应提供了新的思路。


关键词: 草本植物, 解剖结构, 根序, 可塑性, 水分梯度

Abstract: Roots consist of different orders. However, it is unclear whether their anatomical structures are consistent with their response to aridification of habitat. In this study, roots of Kobresia humilis were collected from six plots along a gradient of habitat aridification in an alpine meadow of the Dongda Mountains, southeast Tibet. The paraffin method, one-way ANOVA and principal component analysis were used to examine the difference of anatomical structures and the strength of plasticity for the first and second-order roots from habitats with different moistures. There was no difference of anatomical structures between the first and second-order roots. The epidermal cells were nearly rectangular and closely arranged, and area of single cell was large (87.6-126.0 μm2). The anatomical structures of the first and second-order roots were not consistent in response to habitat aridification. Area and thickness of the epidermal cell and cortex thickness (including thick-walled tissues and parenchyma) in the first-order roots had significant negative correlation with soil moisture, while those in the second-order roots had significant positive correlation (P<0.05). The ratios of epidermis to diameter of first-order roots were significantly different along the soil moisture gradient, while other anatomical structures had no significant difference. The ratios of anatomical structures (except cortical thick-walled tissues) of second-order roots were significantly different along soil moisture gradient. In the first-order roots, the thickness of cortical parenchyma had strongest plasticity, while the thickness of cortical thick-walled tissue had weakest plasticity; for the second-order roots, the strongest was transverse section area and the weakest was vascular cylinder area. Collectively, the anatomical structure of root epidermis and cortex had strong plasticity to the changes of soil moisture. However, anatomical structure of different root orders had different response mechanisms to aridification, showing an improved potential capability to store or absorb water. Therefore, root order method provides a new idea for understanding the adaptation of roots to changing habitats.


Key words: herbaceous plant, anatomical structure, root order, plasticity, water gradient