不同高寒生态系统甲烷通量时空差异及影响因素的量化

doi:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202305.001

生态学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1025-1034.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202305.001

不同高寒生态系统甲烷通量时空差异及影响因素的量化

管崇帆^1,2,何方杰^1,2,韩辉邦³,张蓝霄^1,2,李雅婧^1,2,郑京生^1,2,张劲松^1,2,孙守家^1,2*

（¹中国林业科学研究院林业研究所/国家林草局林木培育重点实验室，北京 100091； ²南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心，南京 210037； ³青海省人工影响天气办公室，西宁 810001）

出版日期:2023-05-10 发布日期:2023-05-04

Spatial-temporal variations in methane flux and quantification of the influencing factors in different alpine ecosystems.

GUAN Chongfan^1,2, HE Fangjie^1,2, HAN Huibang³, ZHANG Lanxiao^1,2, LI Yajing^1,2, ZHENG Jingsheng^1,2, ZHANG Jinsong^1,2, SUN Shoujia^1,2*#br#

#br#

(¹Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry and Grassland Administration/Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; ²Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; ³Qinghai Province Weather Modification Office, Xining 810001, China).

Online:2023-05-10 Published:2023-05-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用便携式温室气体分析仪对位于玉树藏族自治州和玛多县的高寒沼泽、高寒草甸、高寒草原和高寒荒漠生态系统的CH₄通量进行原位观测，同时分析生物量、微生物、营养元素、土壤水分和温度等因子，旨在明确不同生态系统CH₄通量时空差异及其主要影响因素。结果表明：在生长季节高寒沼泽和高寒草甸是CH₄源，8月通量达到最大值，高寒草原和高寒荒漠是CH₄的汇，8月达到最小值，4种生态系统之间的CH₄通量差异显著(P<0.05)；高寒沼泽的mcrA基因丰度最大，高寒草甸次之，而pmoA丰度则是高寒草甸最大高寒沼泽次之，高寒荒漠的mcrA和pmoA基因丰度均最小，4种生态系统之间差异显著(P<0.05)；Pearson相关分析显示，生长季节高寒沼泽和高寒草甸的CH₄通量与土壤温度和mcrA显著正相关(P<0.05)，高寒草原和高寒荒漠的CH₄通量与土壤温度和与pmoA显著负相关(P<0.05)，不同生态系统之间CH₄通量则与土壤水分、有机碳、总氮、生物量、mcrA和pmoA显著相关(P<0.05)；路径分析显示，土壤有机碳、mcrA和pmoA丰度直接对CH₄排放产生显著影响，土壤温度和水分则是通过影响土壤微生物菌群丰度间接影响CH₄排放；在所有的关键影响因子中，mrcA丰度对CH₄通量的相对贡献率最高，达到30.53%，其次是有机碳和生物量。总之，高寒生态系统间CH₄通量差异是由于微生物、有机碳、生物量等因素的不同造成的，高寒地区的CH₄排放模拟估算时需考虑不同生态系统CH₄排放的异质性。

关键词: 高寒生态系统, 甲烷通量, 微生物丰度, 有机碳, 生物量

Abstract: We carried out in situ monitoring of methane (CH₄) fluxes of four ecosystems, alpine marsh, alpine meadow, alpine steppe, and alpine desert, in the Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture and Maduo County, with a portable greenhouse gas analyzer. Biomass, microorganism abundance, nutrients, soil moisture and temperature in each ecosystem were measured. These parameters were investigated to describe spatial-temporal variations in CH₄ flux and quantify the key influencing factors in all the ecosystems. The results showed that alpine marsh and alpine meadow were CH₄ sources, with the maximum flux in August. Alpine steppe and alpine desert were CH₄ sinks, with a minimum in August. During the growing season, there were significant differences in CH₄ flux among the four ecosystems (P<0.05). The abundance of mcrA gene in alpine marsh was highest, followed by alpine meadow, while the abundance of pmoA gene was highest in alpine meadow, followed by alpine marsh. The lowest abundances of mcrA and pmoA genes were found in alpine desert. There were significant differences in mcrA and pmoA among the four ecosystems (P<0.05). CH₄ flux in alpine marsh and alpine meadow was significantly positively correlated with soil temperature and mcrA (P<0.05), whereas CH₄ flux in alpine steppe and alpine desert was significantly negatively correlated with soil temperature and pmoA (P<0.05). Across all the ecosystems, CH₄ flux was significantly correlated with soil moisture, organic carbon, total nitrogen, biomass, mcrA and pmoA (P<0.05). Results of path analysis showed that soil organic carbon and the abundance of mcrA and pmoA had significant direct effects on CH₄ emissions, while soil temperature and water content indirectly affected it by changing soil microorganism abundances. Among all these key factors influencing CH₄ flux, the relative contribution of mcrA abundance was the highest (up to 30.53%), followed by organic carbon and biomass. The results indicated that variations in CH₄ flux among the different ecosystems were caused by differences in microorganism abundance, organic carbon, and biomass. It is therefore important to consider the heterogeneity of CH₄ emissions among different ecosystems when modeling and estimating CH₄ fluxes in alpine areas.

Key words: alpine ecosystem, methane flux, microbial abundance, organic carbon, biomass.

管崇帆, 何方杰, 韩辉邦, 张蓝霄, 李雅婧, 郑京生, 张劲松, 孙守家. 不同高寒生态系统甲烷通量时空差异及影响因素的量化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1025-1034.

GUAN Chongfan, HE Fangjie, HAN Huibang, ZHANG Lanxiao, LI Yajing, ZHENG Jingsheng, ZHANG Jinsong, SUN Shoujia. Spatial-temporal variations in methane flux and quantification of the influencing factors in different alpine ecosystems.[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(5): 1025-1034.

[1]	秦爱丽, 马凡强, 简尊吉, 赵玉娟, 黄吉勇, 缪先梓, 张家玲, 郭泉水. 除草布在崖柏回归初期幼林抚育中的应用 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(4): 1202-1208.
[2]	张斌, 吕玉峰, 李利, 冯美臣, 王超, 宋晓彦, 杨武德, 张美俊. 丛枝菌根真菌接种与磷添加对干旱胁迫燕麦土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(3): 644-655.
[3]	张君钰, 吴普侠, 卜元坤, 苏少峰, 李卫忠. 油松飞播林土壤有机碳密度的影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(3): 895-903.
[4]	孙龙, 胡春雨, 胡同欣. 计划火烧对红松人工林细根生物量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 362-371.
[5]	郭晓宇, 程曼, 徐茂宏, 何新华, 文永莉. 不同坡向亚高山草甸土壤有机碳光降解特征及其对铁添加的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 33-40.
[6]	李晓燕, 李永慧, 秦文萍, 孙羽, 马志雯, 刘翔. 人工草地建植对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤有机碳组分的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 50-56.
[7]	王灯, 王姝, 王业社. 不同生境植物幼苗对光照时间异质性的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 86-95.
[8]	赵晗, 王海燕, 胡兴国, 雷相东, 杜雪, 邹佳何, 崔雪. 基于结构方程的云冷杉阔叶混交林土壤有机碳影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 264-272.
[9]	刘源豪, 黄锦学, 王小南, 陈心怡, 裴蕴, 熊德成, 杨智杰. 大气增温对杉木幼树根系生物量的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2100-2106.
[10]	张玉, 吴福忠, 艾灵, 樊雪波, 杨颖, 郑夏萍, 朱晶晶, 倪祥银. 凋落物输入对土壤可溶性有机碳的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2107-2112.
[11]	程洁茹, 钟全林, 邹宇星, 常云妮, 廖鹏辉. 氮磷配施对刨花楠幼苗相对生长速率与细根性状关系的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 1811-1819.
[12]	袁继红, 任琼, 周莉荫, 缪泸君, 迟韵阳, 万方, 王金平, 万松贤. 鄱阳湖湿地不同环境条件土壤有机碳组分特征及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(6): 1323-1329.
[13]	廖易, 张加龙, 鲍瑞, 许冬凡, 王书贤, 韩冬阳. 引入地形因子的高山松地上生物量动态估测 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1243-1252.
[14]	胡梦婷, 罗旭, 赵鑫田, 李璐. 模拟西伯利亚红松种植对大兴安岭中北部森林地上生物量的长期影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1253-1263.
[15]	郑子潇, 王丹阳, 胡保安, 吴会峰, 韩海荣, 程小琴. 华北落叶松人工林土壤有机碳和团聚体稳定性对间伐的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4): 780-787.

不同高寒生态系统甲烷通量时空差异及影响因素的量化

Spatial-temporal variations in methane flux and quantification of the influencing factors in different alpine ecosystems.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价