欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 1862-1872.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202209.005

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    

喜马拉雅东南部生物多样性保护优先区域微优先区系统规划

叶锦1,2,胡金明1,2,武瑞东1,2,王恒颖3,王军军1,2,周键1,2,王一婷1,2,杨飞龄1,2*


  

  1. 1云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院, 保护生物地理学研究组, 昆明 650091; 2云南省国际河流与跨境生态安全重点实验室, 昆明 650091; 3国家林业和草原局昆明勘察设计院, 昆明 650021)

  • 出版日期:2022-09-10 发布日期:2022-09-14

Systematic planning of micropriority areas in the Southeast Himalaya Biodiversity Priority Conservation Area.

YE Jin1,2, HU Jin-ming1,2, WU Rui-dong1,2, WANG Heng-ying3, WANG Jun-jun1,2, ZHOU Jian1,2, WANG Yi-ting1,2, YANG Fei-ling1,2*   

  1. (1Conservation Biogeography Research Group, Institute for International Rivers and Eco-Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; 2Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650091, China; 3Kunming Survey and Design Institute of State Forest, Yunnan University, Kunming 650021, China).

  • Online:2022-09-10 Published:2022-09-14

摘要: 全球生物多样性丧失严重威胁生态系统服务和功能。在精细尺度上构建高效和代表性的微优先区网络,是提升区域生物多样性保护成效的有效途径。本文以喜马拉雅东南部生物多样性保护优先区域为例,以濒危、特有和国家重点保护植物为代表性保护对象,首先运用Maxent模型模拟物种潜在生境分布,然后基于Zonation模型判识该优先区域内的微优先区,进而分析其生态代表性,最后评估该地区已建保护地的保护空缺。结果表明:(1)物种分布模型较准确地预测出保护植物集中分布于藏东南地区。(2)微优先区主要分布于藏东南高山峡谷区、藏南山原湖盆谷地区及藏西南喜马拉雅山脉中段地区。(3)基于物种识别的微优先区对生态系统及其服务有较好的生态代表性,但将来的保护规划有必要将物种、生态系统及其服务耦合识别微优先区。(4)微优先区与已建保护地在地理分布上存在差异,保护空缺区域主要位于察隅、墨脱北部、洛扎北部、浪卡子南部、岗巴、亚东、康马及萨嘎中部,以国家公园为主体的保护地整合优化工作应重点关注这些区域。本研究可在精细尺度上提升生物多样性保护有效性,为地方层面的保护地体系整合优化提供方法支持。


关键词: 生境预测, 微优先区, 生态代表性, 保护空缺, 喜马拉雅东南部生物多样性保护优先区域

Abstract: Global biodiversity loss seriously threatens the multiple functions and services of ecosystems. Identifying micro-priority areas cost-effectively and representatively at the fine scale is an effective way to promote successful regional biodiversity conservation. This study selected the endangered, endemic and national protected plant species in the southeastern Himalayas priority area as surrogate taxa to represent community biodiversity of the region. Systematic conservation planning model (Zonation) was used along with data on habitat suitability (Maxent) of each plant species to systematically identify the biodiversity micro-priority areas and analyze its ecological representativeness. The conservation gaps in the study area were identified. Our results showed that: (1) The species distribution model accurately predicts that these representative plant species are mainly concentrated in southeastern Tibet; (2) The identified micropriority areas are mainly distributed in the high mountains and valleys in southeastern Tibet, the original lake basins and valleys in southern Tibet, and the middle section of the Himalayas in southwestern Tibet; (3) The micropriority areas identified based on endangered species surrogate has better ecological representation for ecosystem and its services, but it is necessary to combine species, ecosystem and its services to identify micro-priority areas in conservation planning in the future; (4) There are some differences in the geographical distribution between the micro-priority areas and the in situ protected areas. The conservation gaps were mainly located in Zayü, northern Mêdog, northern Lhozhag, southern Nagrze, Kamba, Yadong, Kangmar, and central Saga. The future optimization work in the national park planning in the southeastern Himalayas should focus on those gap areas. This study can provide methodological support to improve the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation at the fine scale and provide decision support for local administration to integrate and optimize the protected areas system.


Key words: habitat modeling, micro-priority area, ecological representativeness, conservation gap, the Southeast Himalaya Biodiversity Priority Conservation Area.