欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 1853-1861.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202209.017

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同电学参数下拦鱼电栅对3种鱼类的驱鱼效果

李阳希1,2,侯轶群1*,金瑶1,万帆3,石小涛2,朱正强1,4,周超艳3,曾玉红5


  

  1. 1水利部中国科学研究院水工程生态研究所, 水利部水工程生态效应与生态修复重点实验室, 武汉 430079; 2三峡大学水利与环境学院, 湖北宜昌 443000; 3中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司, 西安 710065; 4湖北中水长江生态保护研究院有限公司, 武汉 430079; 5武汉大学, 武汉 430079)

  • 出版日期:2022-09-10 发布日期:2022-09-14

Repellency of electric barrier with different parameters on three fish species.

LI Yang-xi1,2, HOU Yi-qun1*, JIN Yao1, WAN Fan3, SHI Xiao-tao2, ZHU Zheng-qiang1,4, ZHOU Chao-yan3, ZENG Yu-hong5   

  1. (1Key Laboratory of Ecological Impacts of HydraulicProjects and Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystem of Ministry of Water Resources, Institute of Hydroecology, Ministry of Water Resources and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430079, China; 2College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443000, Hubei, China; 3Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited, Xi’an 710065, China; 4Hubei Zhongshui Changjiang Ecological Protection Research Institute Co. Ltd, Wuhan 430079, China; 5Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China).

  • Online:2022-09-10 Published:2022-09-14

摘要: 以保护物种齐口裂腹鱼(Schizothorax prenanti)、大渡河软刺裸裂尻鱼(Schizopygopsis malacanthus)和黄石爬鮡(Euchiloglanis kishinouyei)为研究对象,在静水及水流流速为0.3和0.7 m·s-1条件下,选取3种脉冲电压(26、30、36 V·m-1)、4种脉冲频率(3、5、8、12 Hz)共12种组合来研究不同电学参数对拦鱼电栅的驱鱼效果影响。结果表明:在静水及水流流速为0.3和0.7 m·s-1条件下(实验期间水温为18~20.5 ℃,水体电导率为248~270 μS·cm-1),当脉冲电压为36 V、脉冲频率为5 Hz时,拦鱼电栅对3种试验鱼的驱鱼效果最佳且对3种试验鱼均无损伤;随着水流流速的增加,虽然3种试验鱼的拦截率、感应距离均减小,但昏厥率并没有明显变化。本实验中3种试验鱼对不同电场的趋避行为反应,可作为电拦鱼设施设计的依据,也可为3种试验鱼的保护提供参考。


关键词: 拦鱼电栅, 脉冲直流电, 电学参数, 齐口裂腹鱼, 大渡河软刺裸裂尻鱼, 黄石爬鮡

Abstract: We investigated the repellency of electric barriers with different electrical parameters in still water and flowing water of 0.3 and 0.7 m·s-1 on three protected species from the Dadu River, Schizothorax prenanti, Schizopygopsis malacanthus, and Euchiloglanis kishinouyei. Twelve treatments, including three pulse voltages (26, 30 and 36 V) and four pulse frequencies (3, 5, 8 and 12 Hz), were conducted at each velocity at 18-20.5 ℃ of water temperature and 248-270 μS·cm-1 of water conductivity. The results showed that the barrier had the best repellent effect harmlessly on the three fish species with the pulse voltage of 36 V and pulse frequency of 5 Hz in all the three flow conditions. Despite the declined interception rate and the sensing distance of all the three fish species with higher flow velocity, there was no significant difference. The escaping response of the three fish species at given electric settings can serve as the basis for electric barriers design of fish and lay a foundation for their conservation.


Key words: electrical barrier, pulsed direct current, electrical parameter, Schizothorax prenanti, Schizopygopsis malacanthus, Euchiloglanis kishinouyei.