欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 9-17.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202201.017

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

新疆野杏种群结构特征与健康评价

杨其享,刘立强*,秦伟,刁永强,赵忠晶,乌仁其米格,张博   

  1. (新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院, 伊犁州林业科学研究院, 乌鲁木齐 830052)
  • 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-06-10

Population structure characteristics and health evaluation of Armeniaca vulgaris Lam.

YANG Qi-xiang, LIU Li-qiang*, QIN Wei, DIAO Yong-qiang, ZHAO Zhong-jing, WU Ren-qi-mi-ge, ZHANG Bo   

  1. (College of Forestry and Horticulture of Xinjiang Agricultural University, Ili Prefecture Forestry Institute, Urumqi 830052, China).
  • Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-06-10

摘要: 为探明新疆野杏的生存现状,本研究从新疆野杏种群结构特征与生存状况入手,评价新疆野杏的健康状况与更新能力,为其保护与恢复提供理论依据。在新源县吐尔根乡杏花沟、巩留县塔斯托别乡伊勒格代沟、霍城县大西沟乡大西沟和巩留县库尔德宁镇大小莫合沟的4个野杏居群,共设置22个样地,调查各野生果树居群的种群非空间结构(树种组成、胸径(DBH≥5 cm)、树高、冠幅、郁闭度、密度)与空间结构(角度尺、混交度、大小比),基于新疆野杏种群结构评定新疆野杏健康状况。杏花沟、莫合沟、伊勒格代沟和大西沟4个居群的野杏树种比例分别为100%、73.91%、97.70%和36.17%;各居群的林分密度分别为565、322、435、575株·hm-2,郁闭度分别为0.92、0.55、0.82、0.78,林分密度较大,郁闭度较高;4个居群的野杏平均树高分别为6.75、6.48、6.47、6.70 m,平均冠幅6.00、5.26、5.01、6.20 m,树高无显著差异,冠幅较大,林木树冠间存在交叉重叠且重叠的幅度较大。野杏的龄级结构基本上呈纺锤形,总体结构不稳定,主要由83.60%的成熟中、大龄阶个体组成,严重缺乏小龄阶个体(占10.16%)。杏花沟、莫合沟、伊勒格代沟的大小比均值分别是0.46、0.45、0.49,野杏胸径生长处于中庸状态,大西沟的大小比均值是0.63,野杏胸径生长处于劣势状态;4个居群的野杏混交度均值分别是0、0.05、0.20、0.49,野杏在野果林有纯种建群,也有与其他野生果树混生生存;4个居群野杏的平均角尺度分别为0.39、0.37、0.33、0.40,水平分布格局为均匀分布。杏花沟、莫合沟、伊勒格代沟、大西沟的加权综合法指数分别为0.48、0.45、0.30、0.52,加权和法指数分别为0.37、0.48、0.36、0.53。大西沟和莫合沟的野杏种群健康等级为中;杏花沟的加权综合法指数评定的健康等级是中,加权和法指数评定的健康等级是差,综合评价为中等偏下;伊勒格代沟的野杏种群健康等级为差。基于野杏种群结构特征与生活力,综合评定目前的新疆野杏种群健康状况中等偏下,急需开展保育恢复。本研究从表观性状对其健康状况进行了评价,可为后续新疆野杏的生存研究奠定基础。

关键词: 新疆野果林, 野杏, 非空间结构, 空间结构, 生活力, 健康评价

Abstract: We explored the population structure and survival status of Armeniaca vulgaris, and evaluated the health status and renewal ability of A. vulgaris, in order to provide a theoretical basis for its protection and restoration. A total of 22 plots were set up in four A. vulgaris populations in Xinghuagou (Tuergen Town, Xinyuan County), Yilegedaigou (Tastobe Town, Gongliu County), Daxigou (Daxigou Town, Huocheng County) and Mohegou (Kuerdening Town, Gongliu County) in Xinjiang. We investigated the non-spatial structure (species composition, DBH (DBH≥5 cm), tree height, crown width, canopy density, tree density) and spatial structure (angle scale, mixing degree, size ratio) of each A. vulgaris population. The health status of A. vulgaris was evaluated based on the population structure. The proportion of A. vulgaris in four populations of Xinghuagou, Mohegou, Yilegedaigou and Daxigou was 100%, 73.91%, 97.70% and 36.17%, respectively. The stand density of each population was 565, 322, 435, 575 plants·hm-2, and the canopy density was 0.92, 0.55, 0.82, 0.78, respectively. The stand density was large and the canopy density was high. The average tree height of four populations was 6.75, 6.48, 6.47, 6.70 m, and the average crown width was 6.00, 5.26, 5.01, 6.20 m, respectively. There was no significant difference in tree height among the four populations, and crown width was large. There was cross-overlapping between tree crowns, with large extent of overlap. The age-class structure of A. vulgaris was basically spindle-shaped, and the overall structure wasunstable. It was mainly composed of 83.60% of mature, middle-aged, and old individuals, while it seriously lacked young individuals (accounting for 10.16%). The average size ratios of Xinghuagou, Mohegou and Yilegedaigou populations were 0.46, 0.45 and 0.49, respectively, with a middle state of DBH growth. The average size ratio of Daxigou population was 0.63, with an inferior state of DBH growth. The mean mingling degree ofA. vulgaris in four populations was 0, 0.05, 0.20 and 0.49, respectively, suggesting that A. vulgaris can survive in pure population and that it can also survive with other wild fruit tree species. The average angular scales of these four populations were 0.39, 0.37, 0.33 and 0.40, respectively, indicating a uniform horizontal distribution. The weighted composite index of Xinghuagou, Mohegou, Yilegedaigou and Daxigou populations was 0.48, 0.45, 0.30 and 0.52, and the weighted sum index was 0.37, 0.48, 0.36 and 0.53,respectively. The health status of A. vulgaris populations in Daxigou and Mohegou was at moderate level. The health grade of Xinghuagou population was moderate by weighted comprehensive index, and was poor by weighted sum index, being moderate to lower by the comprehensive evaluation. The health grade of A. vulgaris population in Yilegedaigou was poor. Based on the structure characteristics and viability of A. vulgaris populations, the current health status of A. vulgaris populations in Xinjiang was at moderate to lower level. The A. vulgaris populations should be urgently protected and restored. This study evaluated the health status A. vulgaris populations from the appearance traits, which can lay a foundation for further study of the survival of A. vulgaris.

Key words: Xinjiang wild fruit forest, Armeniaca vulgaris Lam., non-spatial structure, spatial structure, vitality, health assessment.