欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 3175-3183.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202110.034

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态栽培对果园水土及养分流失影响的Meta分析  

牛清清1,张琳1,陈云峰2,胡承孝1,伍玉鹏1*   

  1. 1华中农业大学资源与环境学院, 武汉 430070;2农业农村部废弃物肥料化利用重点试验室, 武汉 430064)
  • 出版日期:2021-10-10 发布日期:2022-04-01

Effects of eco-cultivation on soil erosion and nutrient loss in orchards: A meta analysis.

NIU Qing-qing1, ZHANG Lin1, CHEN Yun-feng2, HU Cheng-xiao1, WU Yu-peng1*   

  1. (1College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2Key Laboratory of Fertilization from Agricultural Wastes, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan 430064, China).
  • Online:2021-10-10 Published:2022-04-01

摘要: 生态栽培在果园面源污染防治中发挥了积极作用,但对不同生态栽培模式下果园水土及养分流失防治效果却缺少整体的认识,这制约了面源污染减排措施的制定。本研究应用Meta分析方法对73篇相关文献共1541个研究样本进行了整合分析。结果表明:相比传统果园普遍采用的“清耕制”,生态栽培可使果园径流量减少59.5%,并使随径流产生的泥沙流失量减少86.9%,总氮流失量减少52.2%,总磷流失量减少65.4%;在本研究所选取的生草栽培、间作和覆盖栽培模式中,生草栽培模式在减少果园径流量及减缓泥沙流失和养分流失方面均要优于其他两种模式。进一步对生草栽培模式中的控制因子进行分析发现,人工生草在减少径流量和泥沙流失方面显著优于自然生草;全园生草在减少径流量、氮磷养分流失方面显著优于带状生草;禾本科植物在减缓水土流失和养分流失各方面均优于其他植物;绿肥翻压还田在减少果园径流量、减缓泥沙流失和总氮流失方面显著优于覆盖还田。因此,在生产实践中,人工选择禾本科植物进行全园生草并适当时期进行翻压还田是减缓果园面源污染最优的生态栽培措施。

关键词: 果园, 生态栽培, 水土流失, 面源污染, 元分析

Abstract: Eco-cultivation plays an active role in controlling the non-point source pollution inorchards. Our understanding of controlling effects of different eco-cultivation patterns on soil erosion and nutrient loss in orchards is lacking, which restricts the formulation of non-point source pollution reduction measures. Here, a meta-analysis was carried out with 1541 research samples from 73 relevant studies. The results showed that compared with the ‘clean cultivation’ commonly used in traditional orchards, eco-cultivation reduced runoff in orchards by 59.5%, the loss of sediment by 86.9%, the loss of total nitrogen by 52.2%, and the loss of total phosphorus by 65.4%. Among the sod cultivation, intercropping, and mulching cultivation examined in this study, sod cultivation reduced soil erosion and nutrient loss more efficiently than that of intercropping and mulching. We further analyzed controlling factors in sod cultivation, and the results showed that artificial grass was significantly more efficient than the natural grass in reducing runoff and sediment loss, and that the whole-orchard grass was significantly more efficient than strip grass in reducing runoff and nutrient loss. Gramineae species were a better choice to decrease soil erosion and nutrient loss than other species. Moreover, the green manure return performed better than mulching in reducing orchard runoff, sediment loss and total nitrogen loss. Therefore, it is the best eco-cultivation measure for reducing non-point source pollution of orchard by artificial selection of gramineous plants for whole-orchard grass and returning to the field in an appropriate period.

Key words: orchard, eco-cultivation, soil and water loss, non-point source pollution, metaanalysis.