欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 2954-2966.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202109.039

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于农户受偿意愿的农业面源污染治理生态补偿标准及影响因素

栾若芳1,文高辉1,2*,胡贤辉1   

  1. 1湖南师范大学地理科学学院, 长沙 410081;2地理空间大数据挖掘与应用湖南省重点实验室, 长沙 410081)
  • 出版日期:2021-09-10 发布日期:2021-09-17

Ecological compensation standard and its influencing factors of agricultural non-point source pollution control based on farmers’ willingness to accept compensation.

LUAN Ruo-fang1, WEN Gao-hui1,2*, HU Xian-hui1   

  1. (1School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China; 2Hunan Key Laboratory of Geospatial Big Data Mining and Application, Changsha 410081, China).
  • Online:2021-09-10 Published:2021-09-17

摘要: 农业面源污染治理的关键是从源头有效激励农户主动减施或不施农药化肥,而农业面源污染治理的受偿标准及影响因素对于持续推行生态补偿政策具有重要意义。本文从洞庭湖流域农户调研数据出发,基于效用理论和补偿原理构建效用函数测度农户参与农业面源污染治理个人效用最大化时的生态补偿额度,并利用二元Logistic回归模型分析农户受偿意愿影响因素。结果表明:1)在给予一定生态补偿的情况下,调查区有77.3%的农户愿意参与农业面源污染治理、保护农业生态环境;2)若减少50%的化肥农药施用量,不考虑客观因素的非参数农业面源污染治理生态补偿标准非参数估计结果为2094.41元·hm-2,而参数估计模型结果为1640.21元·hm-2,可分别作为洞庭湖流域农业面源污染治理生态补偿标准的上、下限值;3)回归分析结果显示,农户对政策认知水平是农户接受农业面源污染治理生态补偿的直接关键因素,其中减施农药和化肥的受偿意愿金额是农户参与农业面源污染治理的根本动因。有关部门应从农户意愿视角出发,适当提高现行农业面源污染治理补偿标准,并探寻提升农户幸福感的途经。

关键词: 农业面源污染, 生态补偿标准, 受偿意愿, 农户, 效用理论

Abstract: The key to control agricultural non-point source pollution is to effectively encourage farmers to reduce or not apply pesticides and fertilizers from the source. The compensation standards and influencing factors of agricultural non-point source pollution control are of great significance for the sustainable implementation of ecological compensation policy. Based on the survey data of farmers in the Dongting Lake Basin, we constructed a utility function based on utility theory and compensation principle to measure ecological compensation amount when farmers participate in agricultural non-point source pollution control to maximize their individual utility, and analyzed the influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to accept compensation using binary Logistic regression model. The results showed that: (1) About 77.3% of farmers in the survey area were willing to participate in agricultural nonpoint source pollution control and to protect agricultural ecological environment under the condition of giving certain ecological compensation. (2) When the application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides was reduced by 50%, the nonparame tric estimation result of ecological compensation standard of nonparametric agricultural non-point source pollution control without considering the objective factors was 2094.41 yuan·hm-2, while that of the parameter estimation model was 1640.21 yuan·hm-2, which can be used as the upper and lower limits of ecological compensation standards for agricultural non-point source pollution control in the Dongting Lake Basin. (3) Results of regression analysis showed that the farmers’ cognition level of policy is the direct key factor determining the acceptance of farmers to accept the ecological compensation for agricultural non-point source pollution control. The willingness of farmers to reduce pesticide and chemical fertilizer is the fundamental motivation for them to participate in agricultural non-point source pollution control. From the perspective of farmers’ willingness, related departments should improve the current compensation standards for agricultural non-point source pollution control, and explore ways to enhance farmers’ well-being.

Key words: agricultural non-point source pollution, ecological compensation standard, willingness to accept compensation, farmer, utility theory.