欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1366-1374.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202105.025

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基肥侧位深施条件下穗肥减量对水稻氮素利用率的影响

刘红江,张辉,盛婧,张岳芳,郭智,郑建初,陈留根*   

  1. (江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业部种养结合重点实验室, 南京 210014)
  • 出版日期:2021-05-10 发布日期:2021-05-10

Effects of panicle fertilizer reduction on nitrogen use efficiency of rice under side deep application of basal fertilizer.

LIU Hong-jiang, ZHANG Hui, SHENG Jing, ZHANG Yue-fang, GUO Zhi, ZHENG Jian-chu, CHEN Liu-gen*   

  1. (Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environments, Jiangsu Academy of Agriculture Science/Key Laboratory of Crops and Livestock Integration, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China)
  • Online:2021-05-10 Published:2021-05-10

摘要: 大田试验条件下,以水稻品种“武运粳31号”为供试材料,通过设置不同施氮量处理,采用机械侧位深施基肥,研究了穗肥减氮对水稻产量形成和氮素吸收利用效率的影响。结果表明:2017年和2018年两季水稻,与撒施基肥的N1处理比较,采用侧位深施基肥减少10%氮肥施用量的N3处理,水稻单位面积穗数显著降低,但其每穗粒数和结实率明显增加,保证了水稻产量不减。与N1处理比较,N3处理水稻的生物产量显著降低,较高的经济系数是其产量不减的重要原因。N3处理水稻的氮素累积量、氮素干物质生产效率和籽粒生产效率与N1处理差异不明显;采用侧位深施基肥,随着施氮量的进一步减少,水稻氮素干物质生产效率和籽粒生产效率逐渐提高。N3处理水稻氮肥农学利用率、氮肥吸收利用率、氮肥生理利用率和氮肥偏生产力平均分别比N1处理提高8.9%、8.3%、0.6%、10.5%。在水稻成熟期,N3处理与N1处理稻田土壤速效氮含量差异不大。说明,与撒施基肥相比较,采用机械侧位深施基肥,减少10%的氮肥施用量,能够保证较高的水稻产量,提高水稻氮素吸收利用效率和氮素吸收利用率,并保持土壤肥力不减。

关键词: 侧位, 深施基肥, 水稻, 产量形成, 氮素吸收利用率

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted to explore the effects of reduced application of nitrogen fertilizer on yield formation and nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of rice (cultivar Wuyunjing 31), by setting different nitrogen application treatments and deep application of basal fertilizer with machine at root side. The results showed that, during two seasons of rice in 2017 and 2018, compared with spraying application of basal fertilizer (N1), deep application of basal fertilizer at root side and 10% reduction in nitrogen application (N3) significantly reduced the number of panicles per unit area and increased the spikelets per panicle and filled grain percentage, which ensured the high yield of rice. Compared with the N1 treatment, N3 treatment significantly reduced the biomass of rice; however, its yield was not decreased due to the higher economic coefficient. There were no differences in rice nitrogen accumulation, nitrogen use efficiency of biomass and nitrogen use efficiency of grain yield between N3 and N1 treatments. Under deep application of basal fertilizer at root side, with the decreasing nitrogen application level, N use efficiency of biomass and grain yield of rice gradually improved. Compared with the N1 treatment, N3 treatment increased rice agronomic efficiency, average recovery efficiency, physiological efficiency and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer by 8.9%, 8.3%, 0.6% and 10.5%,respectively. There was no difference between N3 and N1 treatment in soil available nitrogen content at rice maturity stage. Our results indicated that, in comparison with artificial application of basal fertilizer, deep application of basal fertilizer at root side and 10% reduction in nitrogen application could ensure high rice yield, improve both the efficiency and rate of nitrogen uptake and use, and maintain soil fertility.

Key words: side position of root, deep application of basal fertilizer, rice, yield formation, nitrogen uptake and use efficiency.