欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

青藏高原草地管理方式对土壤化学计量特征的影响

李梦天1,秦燕燕2,曹建军1*,许雪贇1,杨书荣1,张小芳1,龚毅帆1   

  1. (1西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730000; 2 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院寒旱区陆面过程与气候变化重点实验室, 兰州 730000)
  • 出版日期:2018-08-10 发布日期:2018-08-10

Effects of grassland management patterns on soil stoichiometry on the QinghaiTibetan Plateau.

LI Meng-tian1, QIN Yan-yan2, CAO Jian-jun1*, XU Xue-yun1, YANG Shu-rong1, ZHANG Xiao-fang1, GONG Yi-fan1   

  1. (1College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2Key Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Climate Change in Cold and Dry Regions, Northwest Institute of EcoEnvironment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China).
  • Online:2018-08-10 Published:2018-08-10

摘要:

草地承包制度实施后,青藏高原地区出现了单户和联户两种草地管理方式共存的局面。以西藏那曲为研究区,对两种管理方式下的土壤化学计量特征进行了对比研究。结果表明:在0~30 cm土层,单户与联户土壤SOC∶STN、SOC∶STP和STN∶STP均无差异;垂直方向上,不管是单户还是联户,0~15 cm土层的SOC∶STP和STN∶STP均显著高于15~30 cm;联户15~30 cm土层的SOC∶STP和STN∶STP显著高于单户;除土壤SOC和STN之间存在显著线性相关关系外,SOC与STP,STN与STP,以及SOC、STN、STP分别与其化学计量比之间存在非线性耦合关系;研究区土壤主要受磷元素的限制。该结果表明,虽然单户和联户的土壤养分存在差异,但其土壤化学计量特征并无明显差异(垂直方向除外)。因此,利用化学计量特征无法有效评价该区的土壤质量。
 

关键词: 更新机制, 树线, 林线生态交错区, 木本植物幼苗, 环境胁迫, 气候变化, 空间分布特征

Abstract: After the implementation of grassland contracting system, two grassland management patterns were formed in the QinghaiTibetan Plateau, namely singlehousehold management pattern (SMP) and multihousehold management pattern (MMP). The soil stoichiometry under two grassland management patterns were compared in Nagqu, China. The results showed that in the 0-30 cm soil layer, there were no differences in the ratios of SOC∶ STN, SOC∶STP and STN∶STP between SMP and MMP. In the vertical direction, regardless of management pattern, the SOC∶STP and STN∶STP at the 0-15 cm soil layer were significantly higher than those at the 15-30 cm soil layer. At the 15-30 cm soil layer, the SOC∶STP and STN∶STP were significantly higher under the MMP than under the SMP. In addition to a significant linear correlation between SOC and STN, there were nonlinear coupling relationships between SOC and STP, STN and STP, as well as SOC, STN, STP and their stoichiometric ratios. Phosphorus was a main limiting factor of soil in the study area. Our results suggested that although soil nutrients were significantly different between MMP and SMP, there was no difference in soil nutrient stoichiometry. Therefore, soil stoichiometry may not be effective in evaluating soil quality in this area.

Key words: regeneration mechanism, tree seedling, spatial distribution characteristics, environment stress, treeline ecotone, climate change, treeline