生态恢复监测研究进展——基于最近三届世界生态恢复大会报告的统计分析

生态学杂志

生态恢复监测研究进展——基于最近三届世界生态恢复大会报告的统计分析

张绍良,刘润,侯湖平^*,杨永均

（中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院，江苏徐州 221116）

出版日期:2018-06-10 发布日期:2018-06-10

The advances of ecological restoration monitoring: Analysis of the latest three world congresses on ecological restoration.

ZHANG Shao-liang, LIU Run, HOU Hu-ping^*, YANG Yong-jun

(School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China).

Online:2018-06-10 Published:2018-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态恢复技术选择的可靠性、恢复工程管理的有效性、恢复项目实施效果的可比性以及生态恢复成功的判断标准等均要求对生态恢复的全过程、全要素进行监测，然而全球可共同遵守的生态恢复监测协议仍处于探索中。本文基于最近三届世界生态恢复大会有关生态恢复监测的报告，采用统计分析法综述了生态恢复监测技术、监测协议以及监测指标等的研究进展。在此基础上，预测未来生态恢复监测研究将有如下趋势：（1）监测技术向自动化、智能化和网络化发展、向生态恢复工程的全方位监测方向发展、向技术密集型方向发展、向要素监测与系统监测相结合的方向发展；（2）生态恢复监测指标体系及其标准将取得共识；（3）综合监测和多学科融合的趋势将愈加明显；（4）监测结果的应用将越来越广泛。

关键词: 细菌群落结构, 芒草, PICRUSt分析, 高通量测序

Abstract: Monitoring the whole processes and elements of ecological restoration is required to evaluate the liability of the selection of ecological restoration techniques, the effectiveness ofrestoration project management, the comparability of the implementing effectiveness of restoration projects, and the success criteria of ecological restoration. However, the globally accommodated monitoring protocol of ecological restoration is still under exploration. Based on the reports presented on the latest three world congresses of ecological restoration (SER) and statistical analysis, we reviewed the research progress in monitoring technology, protocol and indicators of ecological restoration. We predict the research trends of the monitoring of ecological restoration would be as follows: (1) Monitoring techniques will develop toward to automation, integration of intelligence and network, all aspects of ecological restoration project, and tech-intensity. (2) The monitoring indicator system and standards of ecological restoration will achieve consensus. (3) The trend of synthetic monitoring and multi-discipline intersection will be more obvious. (4) The monitoring results will be more and more widely used.

Key words: high throughput sequencing, Miscanthus, bacterial community structure, PICRUSt analysis.

张绍良,刘润,侯湖平,杨永均. 生态恢复监测研究进展——基于最近三届世界生态恢复大会报告的统计分析[J]. 生态学杂志.

ZHANG Shao-liang, LIU Run, HOU Hu-ping, YANG Yong-jun. The advances of ecological restoration monitoring: Analysis of the latest three world congresses on ecological restoration.[J]. cje.

[1]	张胜男, 闫德仁, 黄海广, 胡小龙. 短期封育对科尔沁沙地榆树疏林土壤微生物群落结构的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(9): 2860-2867.
[2]	关健飞, 李旭龙, 曹阳, 刘宇. 黑龙江省表层冻土真菌群落结构特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(9): 2904-2911.
[3]	张军,刘菁,陈长青. 有机稻鸭共作对土壤理化性状和细菌群落空间分布的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3): 822-829.
[4]	李可心, 吴英海, 宛立, 杨静, 荣馨宇, 慕欣廷, 刘峰, 韩蕊. 纳米二氧化钛驱动的人工湿地基质微生物群落差异 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 4068-4077.
[5]	李亚莉, 杨正健, 许尤, 马骏, 田盼. 清江上游利川段浮游细菌群落结构特征及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(11): 3756-3765.
[6]	全紫娇,高萍萍,张杨,王荦,丁君常亚青. 不同温度下刺参肠道菌群结构与功能 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(9): 2756-2764.
[7]	王培欣,杨亚东,王占海,曾昭海. 施肥制度对水稻土壤nosZ型反硝化细菌群落的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(7): 2072-2079.
[8]	严东娜,徐海,侯卫国. 现代分子生物技术在湖泊沉积物古DNA研究中的应用 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(7): 2200-2209.
[9]	赵凤艳,张勇勇,张玥琦,张天实,张国显,张慧,杨丽娟. 有机物料对设施番茄长期连作土壤细菌群落结构的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(6): 1732-1740.
[10]	谭雪莲,阚蕾,张璐,郑嘉仪. 城市森林土壤微生物群落结构的季节变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(11): 3306-3312.
[11]	丁斯予,王荦,徐瀚晨,鲍学宇,王姮,常亚青,丁君. 刺参肠道及养殖环境菌群结构与功能 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(1): 210-220.
[12]	魏志文,李韵雅,江威,廖祥儒. 无锡地区常见树木根际土壤酸杆菌多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(9): 2649-2656.
[13]	覃海华,忻宏蔚,刘洪艳. 不同电子受体下铁还原细菌异化还原Fe(III)性质及菌群特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(6): 1759-1764.
[14]	聂江文,王幼娟,吴邦魁,刘章勇,朱波. 施氮对冬种紫云英不还田条件下稻田土壤微生物数量与结构的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(12): 3617-3624.
[15]	张庆云1,2,谢学辉1,2,俞承志1,2,陈潆1,2,柳建设1,2. 不同共代谢基质对活性黑5脱色菌群脱色性能及群落结构的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(9): 2572-2580.