欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同种植模式对稻田土壤活性有机碳组分及产量的短期影响

曹培1,徐莹2*,朱杰3,田玉聪1,冯香诏1,刘章勇1   

  1. 1长江大学农学院, 湖北荆州 434025;2湖南农业大学农学院, 长沙 410128;3湖北省襄阳市农业科学院, 湖北襄阳 441057)
  • 出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-10

Short-term effects of different cropping patterns on soil labile organic carbon fractions and yields of paddy fields.

CAO Pei1, XU Ying2*, ZHU Jie3, TIAN Yu-cong1, FENG Xiang-zhao1, LIU Zhang-yong1   

  1. (1College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, China; 2College of Agriculture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China; 3Xiangyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xiangyang 441057, Hubei, China).
  • Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-10

摘要: 近年来,随着长江中游玉米和再生稻的快速发展,该地区出现了春玉米-晚稻和再生稻等新型的一年两熟制种植模式,为探明其对稻田不同土层(0~5、5~10、10~20 cm)土壤活性有机碳、碳库管理指数(CPMI)和作物产量的短期影响,于2017年在湖北省荆州市江陵县三湖农场,采用随机区组设计,设置了早稻晚稻(DR,对照)、春玉米晚稻(MR)和再生稻(Rr)3种种植模式。结果表明:与DR处理相比,MR处理不同程度地降低了稻田不同层次的土壤总有机碳(TOC)含量。对于第一季作物收获后,在不同土层,MR处理较DR和Rr处理显著降低了土壤水溶性有机碳(DOC)含量;而土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)为MR>DR>Rr,土壤易氧化有机碳(ROC)含量为DR>MR>Rr。对于第二季作物收获后,各个模式对稻田不同层次的土壤DOC含量和MBC均没有显著影响;但在10~20 cm土层,与MR处理相比,DR和Rr处理的土壤ROC含量分别提高了28.22%和47.37%,Rr处理显著高于MR处理。MR处理利于两季作物收获后各个土层碳库活度(CPA)和碳库活度指数(CPAI)的提高;而Rr处理则利于土壤稳态碳和碳库指数(CPI)的提高。从整个稻田不同种植模式系统周年来看,各处理的不同土层土壤C/N差异趋势一致,均是Rr>DR>MR;且不同种植模式的周年产量无显著差异。从农业可持续发展的角度来看,在长江中游平原区,Rr模式是一项优异的稻田两熟制种植模式。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 有机无机配施, 氧化亚氮, 甲烷, 增温潜势

Abstract: With the rapid development of maize and ratoon rice production recently in the middle reaches of Yangtze River, some new double cropping systems in a whole year such as spring maizelate rice, ratoon rice have been emerged. To clarify the shortterm effects of different cropping patterns of paddy fields on soil active organic carbon fractions, carbon pool management index (CPMI) at different soil layers (0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm) and crop yield, a field experiment was conducted at the Sanhu Farm, Hubei Province in 2017. Different cropping systems were established following a design of randomized block of early ricelate rice (DR, contrast), spring maizelate rice (MR), and ratoon rice (Rr). The results showed that, compared with DR, MR treatment reduced soil total organic carbon (TOC) concentration at different layers of paddy fields to different degrees. After harvesting the first-season crops, MR treatment significantly reduced the concentration of soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC) at all soil depths compared to DR and Rr treatments. The changes of soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were MR > DR > Rr. The changes of soil readily oxidizable organic carbon (ROC) concentration were DR > MR > Rr. After the second-season crop harvest, there were no significant differences in soil DOC concentrations and MBC at different layers among cropping systems. Compared to the MR treatment, soil ROC concentrations were increased by 28.22% and 47.37% at the 10-20 cm soil layer under the DR and Rr treatments, respectively, being significantly higher in Rr than in MR treatment. After the harvest of second-season crops, MR treatment increased carbon pool activity (CPA) and carbon pool activity index (CPAI) of each soil layer, whereas Rr treatment increased stable carbon and carbon pool index (CPI). From the the year-round perspective in paddy field, the soil C/N difference across different soil layers showed same tendency among different cropping systems, being Rr > DR > MR. There was no significant difference in annual total yield among different cropping patterns. From the view of sustainable agricultural development, Rr pattern is an excellent double cropping pattern of the plain area of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.

Key words: alfalfa, organicinorganic fertilization, nitrous oxide, methane, global warming potential.