祁连山张掖段水电开发对区域生态环境的影响

生态学杂志

祁连山张掖段水电开发对区域生态环境的影响

桂娟^1,3,高海宁²,李宗省^1*,邹海明⁴,袁瑞丰¹

（¹中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院（筹），内陆河流域生态水文重点实验室/甘肃省祁连山生态研究中心，兰州 730000；²河西学院，甘肃张掖 734000； 3中国科学院大学，北京 100049；⁴青海省水文与水资源勘测局直门达水文站，青海玉树 815000）

出版日期:2019-07-10 发布日期:2019-07-10

The impacts of hydropower development in Zhangye section of Qilian Mountains on regional eco-environment.

GUI Juan^1,3, GAO Hai-ning², LI Zong-xing^1*, ZOU Hai-ming⁴, YUAN Rui-feng¹

(¹Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin/Gansu Qilian Mountain Ecological Research Center in Gansu Province, Northwest Institute of Ecoenvironment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China; ²Hexi University, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China; ³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; ⁴Qinghai Provincial Hydrology and Water Resources Survey Bureau, Yushu 815100, Qinghai, China).

Online:2019-07-10 Published:2019-07-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2017年7月26日—8月13日，通过实地调研、样方调查、河水和土壤样品分析等方法，评估了祁连山张掖段水电站建设时间、占地面积、水电开发对水质、土壤及生态流量的影响。结果表明：祁连山自然保护区张掖段内水电站建设主要集中在2000—2008年；依据2017年统计数据计算26座水电站总占地面积为798.35 hm²，占祁连山张掖段面积（188×10⁴ hm²）的0.042%，水电工程占地面积较小；祁连山张掖段水电站建设区域内植被盖度、生物量比原生植被分别低27.14%和236.8 g·m^-2；水电站建设区域内水质、土壤状况良好，水电开发对水质、土壤的影响较小；2017年前祁连山张掖段水电开发导致生态水量下降并形成了156.76 km的减水河段。

关键词: 莱州湾, 人工鱼礁, 大型底栖动物

Abstract: From July 26 to August 13, 2017, by the methods of on thespot investigation, plot survey, and the analysis of river water and soil samples, we assessed the impacts of construction time, site area of hydropower stations, and hydropower development on water quality, soil and ecological flow in Zhangye section of Qilian Mountains Nature Reserve. The results showed that the construction of hydropower stations was mainly concentrated from 2000 to 2008. The total area for 26 hydropower stations was 798.35 hm², accounting for 0.042% of total area in study region (1.88 million hm²), which indicated that hydropower projects covered a small area. The vegetation coverage and biomass in the construction areas of the hydropower stations were 27.14% and 236.8 g·m^-2 lower than those of the original vegetation, respectively. The water quality and soil of the areas around hydropower stations were in good conditions, indicating that the water and soil were seldom affected by hydropower development. The hydropower development had led to the decrease of ecological water quantity, causing a waterreduction river section with a length of 156.76 km.

Key words: Laizhou Bay, artificial reef, macrobenthos.

桂娟,高海宁,李宗省,邹海明,袁瑞丰. 祁连山张掖段水电开发对区域生态环境的影响[J]. 生态学杂志.

GUI Juan, GAO Hai-ning, LI Zong-xing, ZOU Hai-ming, YUAN Rui-feng. The impacts of hydropower development in Zhangye section of Qilian Mountains on regional eco-environment.[J]. cje.

[1]	肖泓,尹煮石,张敏,陈桂珠,彭逸生. 广东电白人工红树林大型底栖动物群落的功能特征及其影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(6): 1813-1822.
[2]	敖偲成,胡建成,李先福,谭路,叶麟,蔡庆华. 独龙江河流生态系统健康评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 1281-1287.
[3]	王琰,童春富,汤琳,吴阿娜,吴逢润. 崇明东滩盐沼湿地大型底栖动物功能群分布特征及其影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3): 880-892.
[4]	全秋梅, 肖雅元, 徐姗楠, 符芳菲, 李纯厚, 刘永. 胶州湾大型底栖动物群落结构季节变化及其与环境因子的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 4110-4120.
[5]	刘一霆,刘欣禹,冷宇,徐兆东,王振钟,温若冰. 2004—2015年春季小清河口潮间带大型底栖动物群落特征变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4): 1187-1196.
[6]	袁健美,张虎,汤晓鸿,于雯雯,贲成恺,高继先,刘培廷,胡海生,肖悦悦,许海华. 江苏潮间带大型底栖动物群落组成及次级生产力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(11): 3357-3363.
[7]	杨艳艳,高彦洁,汪健平,徐炳庆,孙春晓. 莱州湾春、夏季鱼卵、仔稚鱼群落结构及环境因子相关性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(10): 2976-2984.
[8]	舒黎明1,2,3,陈丕茂1,2,3,秦传新1,2,3,黎小国1,2,3,周艳波1,2,3,冯雪1,2,3,于杰1,2,3,袁华荣1,2,3,李国迎1,2,3. 柘林湾-南澳岛潮间带冬夏两季大型底栖动物种类组成及优势种 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(2): 423-430.
[9]	李正飞1,2,王军1,2,谢志才1,丁城志3,蒋小明1*. 南腊河底栖动物多样性与环境因子的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(12): 3364-3373.
[10]	任鹏,李海宏,鲍毅新*,龚堃. 茅埏岛大型底栖动物次级生产力时空变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(1): 174-182.
[11]	林良羽,童春富**,李秀珍. 崇明东滩藻类盐渍带大型底栖动物功能群的划分及其分布特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(8): 2229-2237.
[12]	李海宏,江旷,鲍毅新**,王华,任鹏. 茅埏岛不同生境大型底栖动物生物多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3): 765-772.
[13]	刘坤,林和山,王建军**,何雪宝,林俊辉,黄雅琴,张舒怡,牟剑锋. 厦门近岸海域大型底栖动物次级生产力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(12): 3409-3415.
[14]	王军1,2,周琼1,2**,谢从新1,2,李君1,2,韦丽丽1,2. 新疆额尔齐斯河大型底栖动物的群落结构及水质生物学评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(9): 2420-2428.
[15]	舒凤月**,张承德,张超,董龙香,高冉,樊喜英. 南四湖大型底栖动物群落结构及水质生物学评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(1): 184-189.