京津水源区小流域土壤侵蚀空间模拟

生态学杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (08): 1703-1711.

京津水源区小流域土壤侵蚀空间模拟

江青龙1,谢永生1,2**,张应龙1,张怀3,郝晓东3

1西北农林科技大学资源环境学院，陕西杨凌 712100；2中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所，陕西杨凌 712100；3承德市水土保持科学研究所，河北承德 067000

出版日期:2011-08-08 发布日期:2011-08-08

Soil erosion in a small watershed in water source areas of Beijing and Tianjin: Spatial simulation.

JIANG Qing-long1, XIE Yong-sheng1,2**, ZHANG Ying-long1, ZHANG Huai3, HAO Xiao-dong3

1College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; 2Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; 3Institute of Soil and Water Conservation of Chengde in Hebei Province, Chengde 067000, Hebei, China

Online:2011-08-08 Published:2011-08-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对京津水源区生态环境脆弱、水土流失空间分异大、突发性强等问题，以河北省平泉县东北沟典型小流域为例，采用GIS技术与CSLE模型对其土壤侵蚀进行二维空间模拟及侵蚀规律研究，并对模型模拟精度进行验证。结果表明：模型确定性系数>0.85，模拟结果可信度高；小流域侵蚀模数为2359.24 t·km^-2·a^-1，属于轻度侵蚀，侵蚀主要源于15°以上坡面，占侵蚀总量的92.1%；土壤侵蚀模数随坡度先逐渐增加，当坡度>45°时，土壤侵蚀模数有减小的趋势；土壤侵蚀模数空间异质性显著，坡耕地侵蚀模数最大，为6112.90 t·km^-2·a^-1；荒草地占总面积33.2%，侵蚀量却达总量的74.9%；59.3%的侵蚀来自阳坡和半阳坡，而阴坡半阴坡仅占流域侵蚀量的16.2%。研究为利用CSLE模型对小流域土壤侵蚀进行空间模拟提供技术范例，为京津水源区土壤侵蚀规律研究及水土保持生态建设提供科学参考。

关键词: 胶孢炭疽菌婆婆纳专化型, 波斯婆婆纳, 侵染力, 影响因子

Abstract: Aiming at the fragile ecological environment and the strong spatial variability and unpredictable occurrence of soil and water loss in the water source areas of Beijing and Tianjin, a case study was conducted on the soil erosion pattern and its modulus in the Dongbeigou watershed in Pingquan County of Hebei Province by using geographic information system (GIS) and Chinese Soil Loss Equation (CSLE), and the simulation precision of the CSLE was tested. The CSLE had a coefficient of determination higher than 0.85, being highly credible, and the watershed had a soil erosion modulus 2359.24 t·km^-2·a^-1, belonging to light degree erosion. 92.1% of the total soil loss came from the areas with a slope >15°. The soil erosion modulus increased gradually with slope, but showed a decreasing trend when the slope was >45°. A highly spatial heterogeneity was observed in the soil erosion modulus, being the highest (6112.90 t·km^-2·a^-1) for sloping cropland. Degraded grassland occupied 33.2% of the total area, but its soil erosion amount accounted for 74.9% of the total. 59.3% of soil erosion was from sunny and half-sunny slopes, and only 16.2% of it came from shady and half-shady slopes. This study provided a technical basis for applying CSLE to assess the soil erosion in the water source areas of Beijing and Tianjin, and offered scientific reference for the soil and water conservation in the region.

Key words: Veronica persica, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f.sp. veronicae, Pathogenicity, Influential factors

江青龙,谢永生,张应龙,张怀,郝晓东. 京津水源区小流域土壤侵蚀空间模拟[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(08): 1703-1711.

[1]	王琰,童春富,汤琳,吴阿娜,吴逢润. 崇明东滩盐沼湿地大型底栖动物功能群分布特征及其影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3): 880-892.
[2]	侯梦莹,李芊芊,袁甜甜,王文卿,范志阳,洪赐在. 南方滨海地区盐雾沉降的时空分布——以福建古雷半岛为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(8): 2524-2530.
[3]	图雅日拉,黄道友,许超,曾希柏,苏世鸣,王亚男,白玲玉. 废弃冶炼厂重金属镉向周边的扩散及其风险评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10): 3086-3092.
[4]	艾也博,寸应得,范雅倩,程瑞义,刘艳红. 北京松山油松林地表可燃物负荷量的影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(9): 2559-2565.
[5]	陈婷,郗敏*,孔范龙,李悦,庞立华. 枯落物分解及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(7): 1927-1935.
[6]	逄志伟,李显森*,朱建成,孙珊,应一平. 中东大西洋中部海域中上层鱼类中心渔场的时空变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11): 3072-3079.
[7]	王晓军,武江涛,王兵**,温奋翔. 黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域土壤水分空间变异 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(9): 2568-2575.
[8]	李胜男1,2,周建1,2,魏利军1,2,孔繁翔1,史小丽1**. 淡水超微型浮游植物多样性及其研究方法 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(4): 1174-1182.
[9]	王征**,张旭晖. 野生动物觅食地选择的研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(11): 3150-3156.
[10]	王媛媛,张勃**,尹海霞. 1961—2010年陇东参考作物蒸散量时空变化及气候影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(6): 1511-1517.
[11]	耿世聪1,2,陈志杰1,2,张军辉1**,娄鑫1,2,王秀秀3,戴冠华3,韩士杰1,于丹丹1,2. 长白山三种主要林地土壤甲烷通量 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(5): 1091-1096.
[12]	杨琪,张勃**,尹海霞,赵一飞,李小亚. 甘肃河东地区近50年小麦需水量变化趋势及影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(11): 3074-3081.
[13]	王铭1,2,刘兴土1,李秀军1**,张继涛1,王国栋1,2. 松嫩平原旱生芦苇群落土壤呼吸动态及影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(10): 2466-2472.
[14]	沙晨燕,王敏,王卿,陆健健. 湿地碳排放及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(09): 2072-2079.
[15]	贾慧慧,王俊坚,高梅,魏建兵,曾辉. 湿地水环境质量时空分异的影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(07): 1551-1557.