欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 综述与专论 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态风险评价研究进展

孙洪波1,2;杨桂山1;苏伟忠1;万荣荣1   

  1. 1中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所湖泊与环境国家重点实验室, 南京 210008; 2中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2008-07-04 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-02-10 发布日期:2009-02-10

Research progress on ecological risk assessment.

SUN Hong-bo1,2;YANG Gui-shan1;SU Wei-zhong1;WAN Rong-rong1   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2008-07-04 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-02-10 Published:2009-02-10

摘要: 生态风险评价有效整合了学术研究、政策制定和生态环境管理,越来越多地被应用到生态环境问题的解决。生态风险评价研究历经20多年发展历程,风险源从单一风险源扩展到多风险源,风险受体从单一受体发展到多受体,评价尺度也从种群、生态系统扩展到区域和景观水平。但已有研究中,风险受体大部分还停留在生物个体或种群水平,风险受体尺度有待扩展,定性或者半定量研究方法亦难以适应现有研究尺度以及综合性评价的要求,因此,基于区域可持续发展视角的大尺度、综合性定量评价方法和模型将成为未来研究的重点。

关键词: 集约化种植体系, 氮素平衡, 土壤硝酸盐累积, 地下水, 硝酸盐污染

Abstract: Ecological risk assessment integrates the ecological research, decision-making, and environment management efficiently, being applied to treat with the problems in ecological environment all over the world. The research of ecological risk assessment experienced a twenty-year development course of 1) risk source being developed from single to multiple, 2) risk receptor being developed from single to multiple, and 3) risk assessment scale being developed from population and ecosystem level to regional landscape level. In the previous researches, risk receptor was mostly at individual or population level, which should be extended. The qualitative and semi-quantitative methods adopted previously could not fit the demands of current research scale and integrated assessment, and thus, large-scale integrated quantitative assessment method and model based on the viewpoint of sustainable development would be the main research focus in the future.

Key words: Intensive cropping systems, Nitrogen budget, Nitrate accumulation in soil, Groundwater, Nitrate contamination