长白山四种林分土壤CO2释放通量的研究

生态学杂志 ›› 2004, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 42-45.

长白山四种林分土壤CO₂释放通量的研究

林丽莎^1,2, 韩士杰¹, 王跃思³, 谷志静¹

1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳, 110016;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100039;
3. 中国科学院大气物理研究所, 北京, 100029

收稿日期:2003-11-26 修回日期:2004-02-23 出版日期:2004-10-10
通讯作者: 韩士杰
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(KZCX1-SW-01);国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(2002CB412502)

Soil CO₂ flux in several typical forests of Mt.Changbai

LIN Lisha^1,2, HAN Shijie¹, WANG Yuesi³, GU Zhijing¹

1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
3. Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2003-11-26 Revised:2004-02-23 Online:2004-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对长白山地区4种典型林分下土壤释放CO₂通量的研究表明,在较短的时间尺度上,4种林型在CO₂释放通量上有显著的差别,各林型CO₂通量的释放表现出明显的空间异质性,其释放顺序为:山杨白桦混交林>原始阔叶红松林>白桦林>山杨林,其中山杨白桦混交林对CO₂释放的贡献最大,而山杨林最小。4种林分土壤CO₂通量的全日变化过程并不一致,除山杨白桦混交林和气温有较一致性的规律,呈较明显的单峰型外,其余并无明显的变化规律。凋落物对林地CO₂释放通量的变化有显著的影响,有凋落物覆盖的林地土壤CO₂释放量明显大于无凋落物覆盖的林地,其平均通量为262.86～556.55mgC·m^-2·h^-1,而无凋落物覆盖林地土壤CO₂的平均通量为20585～39569mg·m^-2·h^-1。凋落物排放CO₂量占林地总排放量的14%～30%,并且改变了林地CO₂释放通量大小的排序。

关键词: 缺苞箭竹, 土壤养分库, 速效养分动态, 密度

Abstract: The soil CO₂ flux of four temperate forest types was studied in Mt.Changbai. The soil CO₂ flux in the four typical forests was significantly different at short time scale. The released CO₂ flux of the four typical forest indicated obvious spatial heterogeneity. The rate of released CO₂ flux was the highest in Populus-Betula mixed forest and the lowest in populus forest. The sequence was: Populus-Betula mixed forest > broad leaved-Korean pine forest > Betula forest > Populus forest. Daily course of soil CO₂ flux was very different in the four forest types. Except for Populus-Betula mixed forest, in which the changes of CO₂ flux exhibited a single peak and showed relative consistency with changes of temperature, there were no regular changes of CO₂ flux in other forest types. The litter influenced the CO₂ flux significantly in each forest type. The CO₂ flux in the forest where soil was covered with litter was higher than that with out litter. The average value was 262.86～556.55 mgC·m^-2·h^-1 in the forests with the litter and 205.85～395.69 mg·m^-2·h^-1 in the forests without litter. The contribution of litter to total soil CO₂ flux was 14 %to 30%.

Key words: Fargesiadenudata, Soil nutrient pool, Available nutrient dynamics, Density

中图分类号:

S152.6

林丽莎, 韩士杰, 王跃思, 谷志静. 长白山四种林分土壤CO₂释放通量的研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, (5): 42-45.

LIN Lisha, HAN Shijie, WANG Yuesi, GU Zhijing. Soil CO₂ flux in several typical forests of Mt.Changbai[J]. cje, 2004, (5): 42-45.

参考文献

[1] 王娓,郭继勋.2002.东北松嫩平原羊草群落的土壤呼吸与枯枝落叶分解释放CO2贡献量[J].生态学报,22(5):655～660.
[2] 孙向阳,乔杰,谭笑.2001.温带森林土壤中的CO2排放通量[J].东北林业大学学报,29(1):34～39.
[3] 张晓龙,赵景波.2002.西安吴家坟秋季土壤的碳释放规律研究[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),30(1):415～419.
[4] 李凌浩,王其兵,白永飞,等.2000.锡林河流域羊草草原群落土壤呼吸及其影响因子的研究[J].植物生态学报,24(6):680～686.
[5] 崔骁勇,陈佐忠,陈四清.2001.草地土壤呼吸研究进展[J].生态学报,21(2):315～325.
[6] 黄承才,葛滢,常杰,等.1999.中亚热带东部三种主要木本群落土壤呼吸的研究[J].生态学报,19(3):324～328.
[7] 蒋高明,黄银晓.1997.北京山区辽东栎林土壤释放CO2的模拟实验研究[J].生态学报,17(5):477～482.
[8] Anderson JM . 1973. Carbon dioxide evolution from two temperate, deciduous woodland soils[J]. J. Appl. Ecol., 173(10) :361～368.
[9] Buchmann N. 2000. Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands [J ]. Soil Biol. Biochem., 32:1625～1635.
[10] Carlyle JM, Than UBA. 1988. A biotic controls of soil respiration between an eighteen-year-old Pinus radiata stand in South-eastem Australia[ J ]. J. Ecol., 76: 654～662.
[11] Fernandez IJ. 1993. Soil carbon dioxide characteristics under different forest types and after harvest [ J ]. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer .J., 57:1115～1121.
[12] Houghton RA, Davidson EA, Woodwell GM. 1998. Missing sink, feedbacks, and understanding the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the global carbon balance [ J ]. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 12:25～34.
[13] Kucera C, Kirkham D. 1971. Soil respiration studies in tall grass prairie in Missouri[ J ]. Ecology, 52: 912～915.
[14] Lal M, Singh R. 2000. Carbon sequestration potential of Indian forests[ J ]. Environm. Monitor Assessm, 60: 315～327.
[15] Raich JW, James W. 2000. Vegetation and soil respiration: Correlations and controls[J]. Biogeochem., 48(1):71～91.
[16] Raich JW, Schlesinger WH. 1992. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate [J]. Tellus, 44B:81～89.

长白山四种林分土壤CO₂释放通量的研究

Soil CO₂ flux in several typical forests of Mt.Changbai

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕静, 雷鹏, 陈恩, 王聪敏, 陈鹭真, 吴秋华, 刘耀辉, 陈强. 莆田木兰溪入海河口蓝碳生态系统碳储量 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(9): 2913-2921.
[2]	扶清杰, 丘伟国, 林程翔, 张兰怡, 陈诚, 胡喜生. 路网扩展的多尺度生态效应: 以泉州市为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(9): 3063-3074.
[3]	景春林, 周旺明, 许鹏, 张恒明, 谷薇薇, 周永斌, 魏亚伟. 基于样地调查和连续清查的辽宁省森林生物量碳储量及潜力估算 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(7): 2195-2203.
[4]	王恩启, 赵成章, 赵子义, 师文浩, 张歆悦. 黄河兰州段河流湿地植被和土壤碳密度分配格局及影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(7): 2222-2229.
[5]	张伟, 郑运祥, 季镭, 薄顺奇, 谢汉宾, 王军馥, 李必成, 杨刚. 上海地区两栖动物物种组成及种群动态的长期变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(4): 1308-1314.
[6]	李波, 王东睿, 王勇, 李仁明秀, 徐玮, 潘倩, 徐亮, 俸强. 四川丘陵和低山地区小麂活动节律与人类活动关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(2): 589-595.
[7]	则捍东, 陈雅慧, 陈雪初, 由文辉, 杨月, 张钊, 杨华蕾. 浙南北移红树林土壤有机碳库动态变化及其影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(1): 40-48.
[8]	郝宗然, 沈庆华, 周伟龙, 王丹, 陈雅妮, 张煜林, 成向荣. 不同密度杉木萌生林演替初期植物功能性状及其与林分碳密度的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2026, 45(1): 102-110.
[9]	胡诗怡, 杨钙仁, 黄子容, 于芳, 邓汶, 李丽莎, 邓羽松, 卢宝鹏. 南宁市那考河湿地公园下沉式与水平式绿地系统碳密度差异 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(8): 2717-2725.
[10]	杨丽艳, 宋梅玲, 王玉琴, 王宏生, 周睿. 青海省果洛州高寒草甸有害生物种群特征及其地形影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(7): 2164-2173.
[11]	杨周, 张建军, 赵炯昌, 胡亚伟, 李阳, 唐鹏, 王勃. 林分密度对晋西黄土区油松人工林生长特性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(5): 1427-1435.
[12]	于磊, 陆问, 宋佩鸿, 杨秋, 杨怀, 刘文杰, 栾军伟, 刘世荣. 海南岛橡胶林不同复合经营模式碳密度和固碳潜力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(4): 1097-1103.
[13]	董乾真, 胡安, 夏穆容, 段倩雯, 张瑞, 李欣勇. 热带地区农田撂荒地土壤种子库的时空特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(4): 1152-1160.
[14]	胡茸茸, 郭杨, 欧阳勋志, 刘军, 潘萍. 赣中杉木林碳密度空间分布格局及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(2): 365-372.
[15]	黄紫岳, 王园园, 马守田, 刘战东, 高阳, 张俊鹏. 种植品种与密度互作对玉米根系形态的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2025, 44(11): 3613-3619.