欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4233-4240.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202012.035

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生态价值评价的北京自然保护地保护空缺分析  

冯达,胡理乐,陈建成*   

  1. (北京林业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083)
  • 出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2021-06-10

Protection vacancy analysis of Beijing nature reserves based on ecosystem services valuation.#br#

FENG Da, HU Li-le, CHEN Jian-cheng*   

  1. (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China).
  • Online:2020-12-10 Published:2021-06-10

摘要: 整合优化是我国自然保护地体系构建的关键一步。生态价值是自然保护地整合优化的重要依据,也是保护空缺分析的重要指标之一。本文使用影子工程法、碳税法等方法核算了2019年北京全市生态系统水源涵养、土壤保持、防风固沙和固碳能力4个重要的生态价值,分析了北京市各类自然保护地生态价值空间分布格局,并基于生态价值进行北京市保护空缺分析。结果表明,全市土壤保持价值最高(10665元·hm-2),其次是防风固沙价值(8417元·hm-2),水源涵养价值为负值(-21702元·hm-2),表示北京市水源涵养为亏损状态。自然保护地的水源涵养价值最高(100972元·hm-2),其次是土壤保持价值(17738元·hm-2)、防风固沙价值(8422元·hm-2)、固碳价值最低为1051元·hm-2。国家级自然保护区水源涵养和土壤保持的生态价值均值高于其他类型自然保护地,地质公园的4类生态系统服务价值的均值总体偏低。基于生态价值的保护空缺分析显示,高生态价值区域位于北京市西部和北部山区,其中与现有保护地边界临近的保护空缺区域面积为1249.82 km2。本研究表明,基于生态系统服务价值评价结果,能够较合理地分析出北京自然保护地的保护空缺。

关键词: 北京市, 自然保护地, 生态价值, 保护空缺

Abstract: The key step in the construction of Chinese nature reserves system is its integration and optimization. Ecological value is an important basis for the integration and optimization ofnature reserves and one of the most important indicators for the analysis of protection vacancies. Here, we used the shadow project method and carbon tax method to calculate four types of ecological values of ecosystems in Beijing in 2019, including water conservation, soil conservation, windbreak and sand fixation, and carbon fixation. We further analyzed the ecological value distribution of nature reserves. Subsequently, the protection vacancy analysis was carried out based on the ecological value. The results showed that soil conservation had the highest ecological value (10665 yuan·hm-2) in Beijing, followed by windbreak and sand fixation (8417 yuan·hm-2). The value of water conservation was negative (-21702 yuan·hm-2), indicating that water conservation was under deficit in Beijing. Water conservation of the nature reserve had the highest value (100972 yuan·hm-2), followed by soil conservation (17738 yuan·hm-2), windbreak and sand fixation (8422 yuan·hm-2), and carbon fixation (1051 yuan·hm-2). The average ecological values of water conservation and soil conservation functions of national nature reserves were higher than that of the other types of nature reserves, while the average value of the four types of ecosystem services of geoparks was generally low. Analysis of protection vacancies based on ecological value manifested that areas with high ecological value were located in the mountainous areas of western and northern Beijing, and the area of protection vacancies adjacent to the boundary of the existing protected area was 1249.82 km2. Our results showed that we can reasonably analyze the protection vacancies of the nature reserves in Beijing based on the valuation results of ecosystem services.

Key words: Beijing, nature reserve, ecosystem services, protection vacancy.