Welcome to Chinese Journal of Ecology! Today is Share:

cje

• Articles • Previous Articles    

Calculation of Pinus elliotii biomass: A comparison of different methods

LI Xuanran1,2,3;LIU Qijing2;HU Lile4;MA Zeqing2,3   

  1. 1Department of Environment and Resources Management, Chifeng College,Chifeng 024001, China;
    2Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    3Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
    4Institute of Applied Ecology,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Received:2006-01-07 Revised:2006-09-12 Online:2006-12-10 Published:2006-12-10

Abstract: In this paper, three methods including allometry with observed data (AMOD), allometry with calculated data (AMCD), and average sample tree determination(ASTD)were used to estimate the foliage biomass, branch biomass, trunk biomass, and to tal biomass of Pinus elliotii in Qianyanzhou station. The results showed tha t branch diameter was highly correlated to branch biomass and branch leaf biomass, and the linear equation with single parameter (d3) was the best type of equation to describe the correlation. The total biomass calculated by these three methods was adjacent, being 7.9×104kg·hm-2by AMOD, 8.0×104kg·hm-2 by AMCD, and 7.41×104 kg·hm-2 by ASTD. The foliage biomass , branch biomass and trunk biomass, especially the foliage biomass,had a distinct difference when estimated by the three methods, being >20% higher or lower by ASTD than by the other two methods. In related literatures, allometric equation s were also used to estimate the total biomass and apparatus biomass of P. elliotii, but the calculated values were all higher than those by the three methods. AMOD was most reliable when estimating forest biomass, while AMCD could take the place of AMOD in some extent.

Key words: Land use change, Terrestrial ecosystem, Carbon storage, Deforestation, Reforestation, Tillage, Rotation, Fertilization