Welcome to Chinese Journal of Ecology! Today is

Chinese Journal of Ecology ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2777-2786.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202608.034

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Differences in soluble organic carbon and nitrogen in soil and organic materials: A comparative study based on weak and strong extractants.

ZHU Yi1, QUAN Zhi1,2,3,4*, WEI Fulong1, LIU Chang2, MA Jian2,4, LU Caiyan2,4, CHEN Xin2,4, SHI Yi2,4, FANG Yunting2,3   

  1. (1Weifang Institute of Modern Agriculture and Ecological Environment, Weifang 261041, Shandong, China; 2Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China; 3Key Laboratory of Stable Isotope Techniques and Applications, Shenyang 110016, China; 4National Field Research Station of Shenyang Agroecosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China).

  • Online:2026-08-10 Published:2026-08-20

Abstract: Extractable carbon and nitrogen fractions are key components in soils and organic materials, directly influencing soil quality and biogeochemical cycling through their contents and variability. We investigated nine soils and six organic materials that were extracted using two extractants, 0.01 M CaCl2 (weak extraction) and 0.5 M K2SO4 (strong extraction), to compare the variations in extractable organic carbon (EOC) and organic nitrogen (EON). The results showed that: (1) EOC and EON concentrations in soils ranged from 13.1 to 390.8 mg·kg-1 and 3.3 to 30.3 mg·kg-1, respectively. On average, CaCl2 and K2SOextracted EOC accounted for 79%±22% and 88%±16% of total extractable carbon (TEC), while EON represented 10%±10% and 20%±14% of total extractable nitrogen (TEN), respectively. (2) Organic materials exhibited significantly higher EOC (1.2-77.1 g·kg-1) and EON (0.4-8.5 g·kg-1) levels, with EOC/TEC (96%-97%) and EON/TEN (71%-85%) markedly exceeding those in soils. (3) There was a significant negative correlation between SUVA254 (specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm) and EOC/EON ratios, indicating that low C/N extractable organic components were enriched in aromatic structures. (4) In soils, CaClextracted EOC and EON accounted for 19%±8% and 44%±20% of K2SOextracted amounts, respectively, suggesting that weak extraction preferentially mobilized low C/N fractions and that strong extraction released more high C/N fractions. For organic materials, the absence of stabilization mechanisms resulted in negligible differences in extraction efficiency between the two extractants. This study elucidates variations in extractable C/N fractions based on extractant strength, providing methodological insights for the precise assessment of soil C and N turnover and its associated eco-environmental effects.


Key words: soil, organic material, extractable organic carbon, extractable organic nitrogen, extractant type