Welcome to Chinese Journal of Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Ecology ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 292-304.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202601.039

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Review on the conceptual analysis of vegetation resilience and its assessment methods.

LI Jiaxu1, KANG Binyue1, NING Yuanli1, ZHANG Qinze2, LI Hongyuan1*   

  1. (1College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China).

  • Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-01-09

Abstract: As the scientific basis for understanding ecological restoration, the assessment of vegetation resilience provides critical insights that inform decision-making in ecological restoration projects. The use of objective and accurate assessment methods can accurately capture the dynamics of vegetation restoration and provide quantitative decision support for ecological restoration planning. This study focused on vegetation resilience in the context of external perturbations. We analyzed the connotation of vegetation resilience, explored the applicability of different datasets for assessing resilience, and compared the advantages and disadvantages. Furthermore, we reviewed the assessment methods of vegetation resilience under two types of perturbation scenarios: pulse perturbations and press perturbations, and analyzed the advantages, disadvantages, and applicability of these methods in a comparative approach. Finally, a scenario-relevant comparative system for vegetation resilience assessment methods was constructed, laying a foundation for future vegetation resilience assessment and the formulation of ecological protection measures.


Key words: resilience, pulse perturbation, press perturbation, quantitative evaluation, stability