Welcome to Chinese Journal of Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Ecology ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 1804-1812.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202206.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The connectivity and accessibility of Guangzhou greenway network and their response to urbanization.

TANG Yi-jia1,2, PEI Nan-cai1*, SHI Zhao-wan1, LUO Shui-xing1, LUO Yan-hua3, LIU Xiao-tian1, XIE Ya-ting1, HE Ji-hong1, TANG Pin-chuan1,4, YANG Chao5, SUN Qian6, SUN Bing1*#br#

#br#
  


  1. (1Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China; 2Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 3Bureau of Forestry and Landscaping of Guangzhou Municipality, Guangzhou 510060, China; 4School of Forestry & Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China; 5 Architectural Design and Research Institute of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510010, China; 6 Geospatial Sciences, School of Science, GPO Box 2476, RMIT University, Melbourne VIC 3001, Australia).


  • Online:2022-09-10 Published:2022-09-14

Abstract: The distribution characteristics, connectivity, and accessibility of Guangzhou greenway were quantified by density analysis method, network structure index method, morphological space pattern analysis method, and network analysis method. Furthermore, correlation analyses between greenway density and four socioeconomic indicators (i.e., economic development level, road network density, urbanization rate, and population density) were carried out to detect key factors influencing the construction of Guangzhou greenway. The results showed that the average greenway density in Guangzhou was 0.44 km·km-2, and the per capita greenway length was 0.21 m. The construction center of greenway was located in “the-Four-Old-Districts” (Yuexiu, Liwan, Haizhu, Tianhe) and gradually weakened outward in the form of circles. The greenway network structure indices αβ, and γ was 0.149, 1.297, and 0.65, respectively. The network closure degree was relatively low but the complexity and the connectivity were high. 95.82% of the ecological source patches were connected in Guangzhou. The districts with excellent accessibility included the greenway network in Yuexiu, Haizhu, Liwan, Tianhe. The districts with normal accessibility included the greenway network in Baiyun, Huangpu, Panyu, Zengcheng. The districts with relatively poor accessibility included the greenway network in Nansha, Huadu, Conghua. Urbanization rate, population density, and road network density had a positive impact on the greenway construction in Guangzhou, with the value of R2 being 0.749, 0.634, and 0.715, respectively. Guangzhou greenways were densely distributed in “the-Four-Old Districts”, where the network structure was relatively complete and the accessibility was generally convenient, and there was a downward trend for various indicators. To comprehensively promote the formation of a sustainable and ecological space network in Guangzhou as soon as possible, more efforts are needed to construct high-quality greenways on peripheral urban areas, optimizing the spatial structure, improving ecosystem functions, and realizing the goal of shared greenways by all citizens.

Key words: Guangzhou, ecological network, accessibility, network structure, distribution characteristics.