欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2240-2248.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202607.005

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

粤北植被碳-水利用效率时空格局及对气候因子的响应

刘艳群1,2,杜尧东3,邓玉娇2*,黄观荣1,王敏1   

  1. 1广东省韶关市气象局, 广东韶关 512028; 2广东省生态气象中心, 广州 510640; 3广东省气候中心, 广州 510640)

  • 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-07-15

Spatiotemporal variation of carbon and water use efficiency and their responses to climatic factors in northern Guangdong.

LIU Yanqun1,2, DU Yaodong3, DENG Yujiao2*, HUANG Guanrong1, WANG Min1   

  1. (1Shaoguan Meteorological Bureau, Shaoguan 512028, Guangdong, China; 2Guangdong Ecological Meteorology Center, Guangzhou 510640, China; 3Guangdong Climate Center, Guangzhou 510640, China).

  • Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-07-15

摘要: 植被碳利用效率(CUE)、水利用效率(WUE)是表征陆地生态系统碳水循环的重要指标。本研究基于卫星遥感和地面观测数据,采用线性回归分析、稳定性分析、趋势分析及MannKendall检验、Hurst指数和偏相关分析,揭示2000—2024年粤北地区植被碳-水利用效率时空演变规律及其对气候因子的响应特征,为深入理解粤北地区陆地生态系统碳-水循环耦合机制提供理论依据。结果表明:(1)2000—2024年粤北CUE与WUE均值分别为0.509和0.913 g C·m-2·mm-1,呈西北低东南高的分布,CUE呈显著下降趋势,WUE下降趋势不显著。(2)稳定性分析表明,粤北CUE和WUE大部分地区均处于低和较低波动状态。(3)CUE退化范围广,WUE改善区大于退化区;持续性分析表明,未来大部分区域CUE可能会延续下降趋势,WUE持续上升面积大于持续下降。(4)气温对CUE的调控作用强于降水和干旱,降水对WUE的影响强度显著高于气温和干旱,温度升高会抑制CUE,降水增加会降低WUE,但干旱对CUE和WUE的影响更趋向于正影响。


关键词: 碳利用效率, 水分利用效率, 时空格局, 气候因子

Abstract: Carbon use efficiency (CUE) and water use efficiency (WUE) of vegetation are critical variables for characterizing the coupled carbon-water cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Based on satellite remote sensing and ground observation data, we used linear regression analysis, stability analysis, trend analysis, Mann-Kendall test, Hurst index, and partial correlation analysis to investigate the spatiotemporal variations of vegetation CUE and WUE in northern Guangdong from 2000 to 2024 and their responses to climatic factors, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for understanding the coupling mechanisms of carbon-water cycling in this region. The results showed that: (1) During 2000-2024, the mean CUE and WUE in northern Guangdong were 0.509 and 0.913 g C·m-2·mm-1, respectively, exhibiting a spatial pattern of lower values in the northwest and higher values in the southeast. CUE displayed a significant decreasing trend, whereas the decline in WUE was statistically insignificant. (2) Stability analysis indicated predominantly low or relatively low fluctuations in both CUE and WUE across most areas. (3) CUE degradation was widespread. In contrast, improvement areas exceeded degradation areas for WUE. Persistence analysis suggested that decreasing CUE trends would continue in most regions, while projected increases in WUE would exceed decreases. (4) Temperature exerted stronger control over CUE than precipitation and drought, whereas precipitation dominated WUE variation. Increasing temperatures suppressed CUE, while rising precipitation reduced WUE. Drought tended to enhance both CUE and WUE.


Key words: carbon use efficiency, water use efficiency, spatiotemporal distribution, climatic factor