欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 396-405.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202502.026

• 森林生态学专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同混交比例云南松林土壤稳定性和养分特征

王跃超1,李小英1*,杨能2,陈晓琴1,杨奔1,陈梦婕1
  

  1. 1西南林业大学生态与环境学院, 昆明 650224; 2玉溪市玉白顶自然保护区管理局, 云南玉溪 653100)

  • 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-10

Soil stability and nutrient characteristics of Pinus yunnanensis forests with different mixed proportions.

WANG Yuechao1, LI Xiaoying1*, YANG Neng2, CHEN Xiaoqin1, YANG Ben1, CHEN Mengjie1   

  1. (1College of Ecology and Environment, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming Yunnan 650224, China; 2Yuxi City Yubaiding Nature Reserve Administration, Yuxi 653100, Yunnan, China).

  • Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-10

摘要: 混交造林在改善土壤结构、提高土壤肥力等方面发挥着重要作用。本研究对滇中地区不同混交比例云南松林土壤稳定程度及养分含量进行了调查,以期为云南松混交造林模式优化及公益林生态效益评价提供科学依据。按云南松占群落蓄积量比例,选取3种混交比例的云南松混交林:20%云南松+80%阔叶(Y2K8)、50%云南松+50%阔叶(Y5K5)、80%云南松+20%阔叶(Y8K2)的混交林,同时以云南松纯林(Y10)为对照,采用湿筛法测定土壤团聚体稳定性指标、内梅罗指数作为其养分指标并分析其相关关系。结果表明:3种云南松混交林的土壤团聚体稳定性均优于云南松纯林;云南松纯林的深层土壤稳定性最差。3种云南松混交林对土壤侵蚀的敏感程度表现均为“非常低”,云南松纯林表现为“中等”。土壤有机质(SOM)、全氮(TN)、水解氮(AN)、全磷(TP)、有效磷(AP)养分含量均为Y2K8含量最高,Y10含量最低。4种林分的土壤肥力指数分布范围在0.84~1.53,土壤肥力评价均为“一般”;其中Y2K8的土壤肥力表现最优,Y10的土壤肥力最差。AP是所有林分的土壤肥力限制性因子,混交造林可提升土壤AN含量,降低其供养限制性,并提升土壤肥力。团聚体稳定性特征平均重量直径(MWD)与土壤SOM(r=0.85)、TN(r=0.88)、TP(r=0.75)、AN(r=0.68)、AP(r=0.70)呈显著正相关(P<0.05);几何平均直径(GMD)与土壤SOM(r=0.83)、TN(r=0.88)、TP(r=0.75)、AN(r=0.68)、AP(r=0.66)呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。3种云南松混交林土壤团聚体稳定性与土壤肥力均优于云南松纯林,Y2K8达到最优。建议滇中地区森林营造和低值低效林改造中适当增加阔叶树种的比例,并着重考虑20%云南松+80%阔叶的混交比例。


关键词: 土壤团聚体, 土壤养分, 云南松林, 混交比例

Abstract: Mixed afforestation plays an important role in improving soil structure and soil fertility. In this study, we investigated soil stabilization and nutrient contents in Pinus yunnanensis forests with different mixing ratios in central Yunnan. This would provide theoretical supports for optimizing the mixed forestation patterns of Pinus yunnanensis and better evaluation for the ecological benefits of non-commercial forests. Based on the proportion of Pinus yunnanensis in community timber volume, three mixed proportions were selected: 20% of Pinus yunnanensis and 80% of broadleaved species (Y2K8), 50% of Pinus yunnanensis and 50% broadleaved species (Y5K5), and 80% of Pinus yunnanensis and 20% of broadleaved species (Y8K2). 100% Pinus yunnanensis (Y10) was used as the control. Soil aggregate stability was analyzed using screening method, while Nemerow index was used as nutrient index. The correlations between soil aggregate stability and nutrient index were examined. The results showed that soil aggregate stability of the three mixed forests was better than that of the 100% Pinus yunnanensis forest, whose deep soil showed the poorest stability. The sensitivity of the three mixed forests to soil erosion was low, while that of the 100% Pinus yunnanensis forest was at moderate level. The contents of soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), hydrolyzed nitrogen (AN), total phosphorus (TP), and available phosphorus (AP) were the highest in Y2K8 and the lowest in Y10. Soil fertility indices of the four forest types ranged in 0.84-1.53, indicating that soil fertility was at an average level. Specifically, Y2K8 was the highest in soil fertility while Y10 was the lowest. Besides, AP was the limiting factor for soil fertility across all the four forest types. Mixed forestation can improve soil AN content and reduce nutrient supply limitations, and thereby can improve soil fertility. The mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregate was significantly positively correlated with soil SOM (R=0.85), TN (R=0.88), TP (R=0.75), AN (R=0.68), and AP (R=0.70). The geometric mean diameter (GMD) of aggregate was significantly positively correlated with soil SOM (R=0.83), TN (R=0.88), TP (R=0.75), AN (R=0.68), and AP (R=0.66). Our results indicated that soil aggregate stability and soil fertility of the three mixed forests were better than that of Pinus yunnanensis monoculture, with 20% of Pinus yunnanensis and 80% of broadleaved species being the optimal ratio. It is suggested that the proportion of broad-leaved tree species should be appropriately increased in forest establishment and low-value and low-efficiency forest transformation in central Yunnan, with 20% of Pinus yunnanensis and 80% of broadleaved species as a guide.


Key words: soil aggregate, soil nutrient, Pinus yunnanensis forest, mixed proportion