欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 2961-2971.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202312.001

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻鱼共生系统的土壤产甲烷和甲烷氧化微生物群落

陈佳,赵璐峰,戴然欣,章涛杰,唐建军,胡亮亮,陈欣*   

  1. (浙江大学生命科学学院, 杭州 310058)
  • 出版日期:2023-12-10 发布日期:2024-06-10

Soil microbial communities of methanogens and methanotrophs in the rice-fish coculture ecosystem.

CHEN Jia, ZHAO Lufeng, DAI Ranxin, ZHANG Taojie, TANG Jianjun, HU Liangliang, CHEN Xin*   

  1. (College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China).
  • Online:2023-12-10 Published:2024-06-10

摘要: 稻鱼共生对稻田甲烷(CH4)排放产生明显影响,但稻鱼共生是否影响与CH4排放相关的产甲烷菌和甲烷氧化菌仍有待阐明。本研究以全球重要农业文化遗产——青田稻鱼系统为例,通过田间试验,比较研究了水稻单作系统(RM)、无饲料投放的稻鱼共生系统(RFN)和有饲料投放的稻鱼共生系统(RFF)水稻和田鱼的产量、土壤碳氮磷含量以及产甲烷和甲烷氧化微生物的特征。结果表明,RFF的水稻产量和土壤碳氮增量均显著高于RM。荧光定量PCR分析表明,稻鱼共生(RFN和RFF)的产甲烷菌和甲烷氧化菌丰度显著高于RM,且RFF的产甲烷菌丰度显著高于RFN。Illumina Miseq测序分析表明,稻鱼共生显著影响产甲烷菌群落结构,但对甲烷氧化菌群落结构的影响不显著;对于不同代谢类型的产甲烷菌,稻鱼共生(RFN和RFF)氢营养型产甲烷菌的丰度显著高于RM,且RFF的乙酸营养型产甲烷菌丰度显著高于RFN;对于不同代谢类型的甲烷氧化菌,RFN和RFF对类型Ⅰ的甲烷氧化菌丰度影响均不显著;RFF中类型Ⅱ的甲烷氧化菌丰度显著高于RM和RFN。可见,稻鱼共生可明显影响产甲烷菌和甲烷氧化菌的群落组成,且稻鱼共生的效应会受到饲料投放与否的调控。


关键词: 稻鱼共生系统, 土壤微生物, 产甲烷菌, 甲烷氧化菌

Abstract: The effects of rice-fish coculture on soil methane (CH4) emission have been well documented, but it remains unclear whether rice-fish coculture affects methanogens and methanotrophs. To examine the effects of rice-fish coculture on soil methanogens and methanotrophs, we conducted a field experiment in the site of the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)―Qingtian rice-fish system. There were three treatments, including rice monoculture (RM), rice-fish coculture without feed (RFN), and rice-fish coculture with feed (RFF). The yields of rice and fish, the contents of soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (TN) and soil total phosphorus (TP), and the communities of methanogens and methanotrophs were examined. The results showed that rice yield and the increments of SOC and TN in the treatment RFF were significantly higher than those in treatments RM and RFN. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis showed that the abundances of methanogen and methanotroph in both RFN and RFF were significantly higher than those in RM, while RFF had significantly higher methanotroph abundance than RFN. The Illumina Miseq analyses showed that both RFN and RFF affected the community structure of methanogen, but did not affect the methanotroph. For the different metabolic types of methanogens, RFN and RFF had higher abundance of Hydrogenotrophic than RM, and RFF had higher abundance of Aceticlastic than RFN. For the different metabolic types of methanotrophs, both RFN and RFF did not affect the abundance of Type I compared to RM, but the abundance of Type Ⅱ in RFF was significantly higher than those in RM and RFN. Our results suggest that rice-fish coculture affects the community composition of methanogen and methanotroph, which may be mediated by fish feed input.


Key words: rice-fish coculture system, soil microorganisms, methanogen, methanotroph.