欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 233-244.doi: : 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202101.025

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态系统服务价值评估:研究进展与展望

殷楠,王帅*,刘焱序   

  1. (北京师范大学地理科学学部地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100875)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-10 发布日期:2021-06-10

Ecosystem service value assessment: Research progress and prospects.

YIN Nan, WANG Shuai*, LIU Yan-xu   

  1. (1State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China).
  • Online:2021-01-10 Published:2021-06-10

摘要: 生态系统服务作为连接生态系统结构、过程与人类福祉之间的桥梁,对其进行价值评估可以为评估生态系统质量变化、制定生态系统服务付费政策提供可靠依据,促进生态系统保护和生态文明建设。本文通过对生态系统服务分类体系的梳理和价值评估案例的归纳,重点对调节服务和文化服务的价值评估方法进行了总结。本研究将生态系统服务价值评估研究历程划分为定性描述、快速发展、多元化发展和综合应用四个阶段;比较了四种主要生态系统服务分类系统及其异同,总结了生态系统主要调节服务价值化评估公式及参数,以及文化服务价值评估新方法与趋势。针对生态系统服务价值化的研究在数据的科学性、规范性和科学研究与实践政策的衔接等方面存在的问题,未来研究中应注重根据用途确定价值评估的数据精度和时空尺度,继续发展标准化的价值评估指标体系,深入理解生态系统服务价值评估与人类福祉及可持续发展之间关系。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 调节服务, 文化服务, 价值评估

Abstract: Ecosystem services act as a bridge between ecosystem structures, processes and human well-being. Valuating ecosystem services can be used to evaluate changes in the quality of ecosystems, to provide a reliable basis for formulating payment for ecosystem services policies, and to promote ecosystem protection and ecological civilization construction. Here, the classification system of ecosystem services is reviewed and the valuation cases are summarized, mainly focusing on the regulation and cultural services. The research history of ecosystem service valuation could be divided into four stages: qualitative description, rapid development, diversification, and integrated application. The similarities and differences of four classification systems for major ecosystem services are compared. Formulas and parameters for valuation of the main regulation services, and new approaches and trends in cultural service valuation are summarized. There are still problems in aspects of scientific and normative data and the interface between scientific research and practical policies. Future research should focus on defining data precision and temporal and spatial scales of evaluation according to their utilization, continuing to develop standardized systems of value evaluation indicators, and in-depth understanding the relationship between evaluation of ecosystem services and human well-being and sustainable development.

Key words: ecosystem services, regulation services, cultural services, evaluation.