青藏高原中东部表土轻组碳氮含量分布及其影响因素

生态学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2565-2573.

青藏高原中东部表土轻组碳氮含量分布及其影响因素

杨雪梅^1,2,杨安²,邢文聪²,王小霞²,刘小龙³,Khan M.G. Mostofa¹,李军^3*

（¹天津大学表层地球系统科学研究院，天津 300072； ²天津师范大学地理与环境科学学院，天津 300387; ³天津师范大学天津市水资源与水环境重点实验室，天津 300387）

出版日期:2020-08-10 发布日期:2021-02-10

Distribution and impact factors of carbon and nitrogen contents in light fractions of topsoil on the central and eastern Tibetan Plateau.

YANG Xue-mei^1,2, YANG An², XING Wen-cong², WANG Xiao-xia², LIU Xiao-long³, Khan M.G. Mostofa¹, LI Jun^3*

(¹Institute of SurfaceEarth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; ²College of Geography and Environmental Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China; ³Tianjin Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China).

Online:2020-08-10 Published:2021-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤轻组（LF）能够反映因人为活动或环境变化引起的土壤微弱改变。为探究青藏高原土壤LF含量分布及其影响因素，分析了青藏高原中东部不同植被类型下表土LF、重组（HF）及其碳氮含量和碳氮比（C/N），讨论了LF碳氮含量及C/N与环境因子的相互关系。结果表明：青藏高原中东部表土LF占土壤总有机质的比例很小（2.11%），不同植被类型表土LF含量排序为：林地>高寒草甸>高山草原>荒漠。表土轻组有机碳（LFOC）、重组有机碳（HFOC）平均含量分别为27.23%和2.39%，以林地最高（31.73%，2.64%），荒漠LFOC和高寒草甸HFOC含量最低，分别为24.63%和2.30%。轻组总氮（LFTN）、重组总氮（HFTN）平均含量分别为1.22%和0.12%，以高寒草甸最高（1.28%，0.12%），林地最低（1.14%，0.10%）。轻重组C/N均值分别为27.67和11.59，以林地最高（36.95, 15.15），高寒草甸轻组C/N和高山草原重组C/N最低，分别为25.45和10.03，表明林地腐殖化程度较高，有效氮含量较低，而高寒草甸和高山草地与之相反。青藏高原中东部表土LF含量及分布受植被类型影响明显，土壤pH值是影响LF碳氮含量最重要的环境因子。

关键词: 青藏高原, 表土, 轻重组分, 碳氮含量, 分布特征

Abstract: The light fraction (LF) of soil is sensitive for identifying changes in soil due to human activities or environmental changes. To explore the distribution and influencing factors of soil LF content on the central and eastern Tibetan Plateau, we measured the LF, heavy fraction (HF) and its carbon and nitrogen content and C/N ratio of topsoil at different vegetation types. We further analyzed the relationships between the carbon and nitrogen content, C/N ratio of LF and environmental factors. The results showed that the contribution of LF to total soil organic matter was small (2.11%). The content of LF in topsoil at different vegetation types followed the order of forest land > alpine meadow > alpine steppe > desert. The average contents of soil LF organic carbon (LFOC) and HF organic carbon (HFOC) in all sampling sites were 27.23% and 2.39%, respectively, with highest content in the forests (31.73% vs. 2.64%). LFOC was the lowest in desert (24.63%), whilst HFOC was the lowest in alpine meadow (2.30%). The average contents of LF total nitrogen (LFTN) and HF total nitrogen (HFTN) were 1.22% and 0.12%, respectively, being highest in alpine meadow (1.28% vs. 0.12%) and lowest in forests (1.14% vs. 0.10%). The average value of the LF C/N ratio and HF C/N ratio was 27.67 and 11.59. C/N ratio in both LF and HF (36.95 vs. 15.15) was the highest in the forests, whilst was the lowest in LF of alpine meadow (25.45) and in HF of alpine steppe (10.03). These results imply that humification degree of forests is high and the available nitrogen content is low, while an opposite pattern was found for alpine meadows and alpine steppe. The contents and distribution of the LF in topsoil on the central and eastern Tibetan Plateau significantly varied across vegetation type, while soil pH is the most important environmental factor affecting LF carbon and nitrogen contents.

Key words: Tibetan Plateau, topsoil, light and heavy fraction, carbon and nitrogen content, distribution characteristics.

杨雪梅, 杨安, 邢文聪, 王小霞, 刘小龙, Khan M.G. Mostofa, 李军. 青藏高原中东部表土轻组碳氮含量分布及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(8): 2565-2573.

YANG Xue-mei, YANG An, XING Wen-cong, WANG Xiao-xia, LIU Xiao-long, Khan M.G. Mostofa, LI Jun. Distribution and impact factors of carbon and nitrogen contents in light fractions of topsoil on the central and eastern Tibetan Plateau.[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39(8): 2565-2573.

[1]	马建国, 朱怀德, 李玉满, 杨小倩, 姚梦凡, 杨振辉, 王晓波. 土壤水分影响青藏高原东部高寒草地植物群落特征及生态系统多功能性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 1-7.
[2]	张馨, 李雪, 于君宝, 栗云召, 管博, 周洁, 凌越, 马元庆. 黄河口滨海湿地不同景观类型的潮沟分布特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2218-2226.
[3]	钱怡顺, 熊忠平, 徐正会, 刘霞, 钱昱含, 房华, 祁彪, 郭宁妍, 陈超. 青藏高原西北坡及邻近地区蚂蚁物种多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(7): 1721-1730.
[4]	张云霞, 汪仕美, 李焱, 高秉丽, 巩杰. 2000—2020年青藏高原生态质量时空变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(6): 1464-1473.
[5]	田悦, 刘艳. 西藏高寒草原苔藓植物群丛特征及其与生态因子的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1035-1042.
[6]	周天祺, 孔维栋, 陈昊. 青藏高原草地土壤微生物研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4): 983-990.
[7]	郭建晓, 桑会勇, 翟亮. 青藏高原植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其驱动因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(11): 2665-2674.
[8]	张超飞, 马素萍, 何晓波, 汪少勇. 长江源多年冻土区土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(9): 1665-1673.
[9]	唐艺家, 裴男才, 施招婉, 罗水兴, 骆燕华, 刘晓天, 谢亚婷, 何继红, 唐品川, 杨超, 孙倩, 孙冰. 广州市绿道网络连通性、可达性及其对城市化的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(9): 1804-1812.
[10]	郭翔, 赵金鹏, 王茹琳, 李旭毅. 四川盆区油菜播期涝渍害时空特征及危险性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1406-1413.
[11]	冯朝晖, 李宣瑾, 胡健, 王凌青. 基于景观格局的青藏高原东部典型区生态安全分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1188-1196.
[12]	雒淑红, 骆玉珍, 张维维, 刘文, 何山文, 安磊, 王永杰, 韩继刚. 上海城市绿地土壤立枯丝核菌（Rhizoctonia solani）和齐整小核菌（Sclerotium rolfsii）空间分布特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(5): 941-947.
[13]	龙籍艺, 童春富, 王涛, 吴逢润, 刘毛亚. 长江口潮间带沉积物微塑料分布特征及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(9): 2860-2871.
[14]	张萌, 石松林, 石春明, 白海, 李宗善, 彭培好. 川西高原4种典型针叶树径向生长对气候因子的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 1947-1957.
[15]	王百羽, 张珣, 王宝玉, 蔺新, 武轶, 安婧. 沈阳蔬菜地土壤中典型抗生素抗性基因与可移动元件分布特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 2113-2119.