欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

滇池流域人工林群落结构及水土保持效益

胡长杏1,2,彭明春1,王崇云1**,杜建海1,李博3,陈振亮4,付琦1   

  1. 1云南大学生态学与地植物学研究所, 昆明 650091; 2云南省科学技术馆, 昆明 650031; 3云南农业大学资源与环境学院, 昆明 650201; 4福建省华厦建筑设计院, 福州 350004)
  • 出版日期:2012-12-10 发布日期:2012-12-10

Community structure and soil and water conservation benefits of manmade forests inDianchi  Lake watershed, Yunnan Province of Southwest China.

HU Chang-xing1,2, PENG Ming-chun1, WANG Chong-yun1**, DU Jian-hai1, LI Bo3, CHEN Zhen-Liang4, FU Qi1   

  1. (1Institute of Ecology and Geobotany, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China; 2Yunnan Science and Technology Museum, Kunming 650031, China; 3Resources and Environment College of Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
    ; 4Fujan Huaxia Institute of Architectural Design, Fuzhou 350004, China)
  • Online:2012-12-10 Published:2012-12-10

摘要: 以滇池流域5种主要人工林(柏木林、桉树林、银荆林、华山松林和云南松林)为研究对象,通过样方调查,分析群落结构特征,并构建了由植被、枯落物、土壤、地形4个因子组成的水土保持功能评价指标体系,在对所选取的8个指标进行标准化、确定权重的基础上,运用理想点综合评价方法评价其水土保持效益。结果表明:各人工林群落优势种重要值(IV)分别为:柏木89.69、桉树74.27、银荆96.35、华山松84.93、云南松65.65。桉树林、云南松林分层物种多样性表现为灌木层>草本层>乔木层,柏木林、银荆林和华山松林分层物种多样性表现为草本层>灌木层>乔木层。云南松林的群落总体物种多样性最高,华山松林和桉树林次之,柏木林较低,银荆林最低。各人工林水土保持效益依次为:云南松林>华山松林>柏木林>桉树林>银荆林,表明乡土树种作为水土保持林具有一定的优势。不同人工林在物种多样性及水土保持效益等方面存在明显差异,应根据立地条件选择适宜的造林树种及搭配方式,提升其生态功能,控制水土流失。

Abstract: A plot investigation was made on the community structure of five main man-made forests (Cupressus duclouxiana, Eucalyptus globules, Acacia dealbara, Pinus armandii, and P. yunnanensis plantations) in the Dianchi Lake watershed of Yunnan Province, Southwest China. A functional evaluation index system of soil and water conservation, which consisted of four factors (vegetation, litter, soil, and landform), was established. Based on the normalization and weighting of 8 selected indices, and using ideal point comprehensive evaluation method, the soil and water conservation benefits of the plantations were evaluated. The importance value (IV) of the dominant species in the five plantations was 89.69 for C. duclouxiana, 74.27 for E. globulus, 96.35 for A. dealbara, 84.93 for P. armandii, and 65.65 for P. yunnanensis. Among the five plantations, the species diversity in different layers of E. globules and P. yunnanensis plantations was shrub layer > herb layer > tree layer, and that in different layers of C. duclouxiana, A. dealbara, and P. armandii plantations was herb layer > shrub layer > tree layer. P. yunnanensis plantation had the highest overall community diversity, followed by P. armandii, E. globules, C. louxiana, and A. dealbara plantation. The soil and water conservation benefits of the plantations were  P. unnanensis > P. armandii  > C. duclouxiana > E. globulus > A. dealbara, which revealed that native tree species had more advantages in soil and water conservation. There existed obvious differences in the species diversity and soil and water conservation benefits between different plantations, and thus, it would be needed to select suitable tree species and their reasonable combinations for the local sites to improve their ecosystem functioning and to control soil and water loss.