水氮调控对设施土壤供氮潜力的影响

生态学杂志

水氮调控对设施土壤供氮潜力的影响

吴汉卿^1,2,3,李素捷¹,刘洋屹¹,张鑫蕊¹,赵奇隆¹,李梦思¹,邹洪涛^1,2,3,党秀丽^1,2,3,张玉玲^1,2,3,虞娜^1,2,3*

（¹沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院，沈阳 110866；²农业农村部东北耕地保育重点实验室，沈阳 110866；³发改委土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室，沈阳 110866）

出版日期:2019-05-10 发布日期:2019-05-10

Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization regulations on soil nitrogen supply potential in greenhouse.

WU Han-qing^1,2,3, LI Su-jie¹, LIU Yang-yi¹, ZHANG Xin-rui¹, ZHAO Qi-long¹, LI Meng-si¹, ZOU Hong-tao^1,2,3, DANG Xiu-li^1,2,3, ZHANG Yu-ling^1,2,3, YU Na^1,2,3*

(¹College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China; ²Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Northeast China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shenyang 110866, China; ³National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, Shenyang 110866, China).

Online:2019-05-10 Published:2019-05-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用连续3年不同灌水下限(25、35和45 kPa)和施氮量(75、300和525 kg N·hm^-2)的膜下滴灌设施番茄田间试验，探讨水氮调控对设施土壤供氮潜力的影响。结果表明：灌水下限和施氮量对土壤有机碳和全氮储量的影响显著，而水氮交互作用对二者影响均不显著；灌水下限、施氮及其交互作用对休耕期0～30 cm设施土壤有机氮组分、微生物量氮和固定态铵储量的影响显著；不同水氮调控下，设施番茄休耕期0~30 cm土壤酸解氮组分储量及占酸解总氮比例的大小顺序依次为酸解氨基酸氮＞酸解铵态氮＞酸解未知氮＞酸解氨基糖氮；酸解氨基酸氮是设施土壤中最主要的有机氮形态；酸解氨基酸氮与酸解铵态氮、酸解氨基糖氮、酸解总氮、非酸解氮、有机碳和全氮均呈显著相关；土壤固定态铵与酸解氨基酸氮呈显著正相关；土壤微生物量氮与酸解铵态氮、酸解氨基糖氮呈显著正相关，与酸解氨基酸氮呈显著负相关。土壤酸解氨基酸氮、土壤微生物量氮和固定态铵在一定程度上可作为设施土壤供氮潜力的反映指标，科学合理的水氮措施对提升设施土壤供氮潜力具有重要意义。

关键词: 连通性指数, 距离模型, 生态服务价值, 海涂围垦, 城市水体

Abstract: Soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), fixed ammonium (FA), microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) and organic nitrogen fractions are important indicators of soil nitrogen supply potential. A three-year tomato field experiment with mulchfilm drip irrigation was conducted to investigate the effects of lower irrigation limits (25, 35, and 45 kPa) and nitrogen fertilization levels (75, 300, and 525 kg·N·hm^-2) on greenhouse soil N supply potential (including SOC, TN, FA, SMBN and soil organic nitrogen fraction storage). The results showed that the main effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on the storage of SOC and TN were statistically significant, but that was not the case for their interactive effects. The main and interactive effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on the storage of greenhouse soil organic nitrogen fractions, SMBN and FA at 0-30 cm soil layer were significant in the fallow period. Under different treatments of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization regulations, the proportions of acidolysable organic nitrogen fractions in greenhouse soil during the fallow period followed the order: acidoly sable amino acid nitrogen (AAN) > acidolysable ammonium nitrogen (AN) > acidolysable unknown nitrogen (UN) > acidolysable amino sugar nitrogen (ASN). AAN was the major fraction of greenhouse soil organic nitrogen. AAN had a significant positive correlation with AN, ASN, acid hydrolyzed nitrogen (AHN), non-acidrolyzable nitrogen (NAN), SOC and TN. There was a significant positive correlation between FA and AAN. SMBN was positively correlated with ASN and AN, and negatively correlated with AAN. Therefore, AAN, SMBN and FA could be used as indicators for greenhouse soil nitrogen supply potential in a certain extent. Reasonable regulations of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization are conducive to improving greenhouse soil nitrogen supply potential.

Key words: connectivity index, distance model, ecological services value, tidal flat reclamation, urban waterbody.

吴汉卿,李素捷,刘洋屹,张鑫蕊,赵奇隆,李梦思,邹洪涛,党秀丽,张玉玲,虞娜. 水氮调控对设施土壤供氮潜力的影响[J]. 生态学杂志.

WU Han-qing, LI Su-jie, LIU Yang-yi, ZHANG Xin-rui, ZHAO Qi-long, LI Meng-si, ZOU Hong-tao, DANG Xiu-li, ZHANG Yu-ling, YU Na. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization regulations on soil nitrogen supply potential in greenhouse.[J]. cje.

[1]	袁峰, 陈存友, 胡希军, 周冬梅, 刘路云. 景观特征对水体热缓释效应的影响及其效率阈值 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(7): 1739-1748.
[2]	高扬,李加林,刘瑞清,王中义,汪海峰,刘永强. 长江三角洲核心区绿地系统时空演变特征及生态服务价值评估 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3): 956-968.
[3]	曾黎,杨庆媛*,杨人豪,陈伊多. 三峡库区生态屏障区景观格局优化——以重庆市江津区为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5): 1364-1373.
[4]	肖骁1,2,穆治霖3,赵雪雁4,李京忠2,5,薛冰1,2*. 基于RS/GIS的东北地区森林生态系统服务功能价值评估 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(11): 3298-3304.
[5]	李潇然1,李阳兵1,2**,王永艳3,邵景安1. 三峡库区县域景观生态安全格局识别与功能分区——以奉节县为例 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(7): 1959-1967.
[6]	潘竟虎**. 甘肃省区域生态补偿标准测度 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(12): 3286-3294.
[7]	马中华, 张勃,张建香, 靳生理, 孙力炜. 疏勒河中游生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(11): 2584-2589.
[8]	田耀武,肖文发,黄志霖. 基于AnnAGNPS模型的三峡库区黑沟小流域退耕还林生态服务价值 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(04): 670-676.
[9]	曲艺,栾晓峰. 基于最小费用距离模型的东北虎核心栖息地确定与空缺分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(09): 1866-1874.