森林生态系统CO2通量的研究方法及研究进展

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 介绍了测量森林生态系统CO₂通量的微气象法和箱式法.其中,微气象学方法着重介绍了涡旋相关法和驰豫涡旋积累法的基本原理及数据分析过程中应注意的问题,并简要介绍了能量平衡法和空气动力学法.箱式法主要介绍了其测定基本原理和数据的模型化处理及应注意的问题.同时,对近年来欧洲和美洲在森林生态系统CO₂通量研究中所取得的进展进行了概述.

关键词: 人工草地, 草地退化, 恢复, 生理生态

Abstract: Micrometeorological methods and enclosures/chamber methods for estimating the forest CO₂ flux were introduced in this paper. Eddy covariance method, relaxed eddy accumulation method, energy balance method and aerodynamic method were introduced in the micrometeorological methods. In case of enclosures/chamber methods, the principles of this method and data modeling analysis were given. Finally, the research advances on forest CO₂ flux estimation in Europe and America were proposed.

Key words: Artificial grassland, Grassland degradation, Restoration, Phytoecology

中图分类号:

S718.5

王文杰, 于景华, 毛子军, 祖元刚. 森林生态系统CO₂通量的研究方法及研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2003, (5): 102-107.

WANG Wenjie, Yu Jinghua, MAO Zizjun, ZU Yuangang. Study method and research advance in forest CO₂ flux[J]. cje, 2003, (5): 102-107.

参考文献

[1]Anderson DE, Verma SB, Rosenberg NJ. 1984. Eddy correlation measurements of CO₂, latent heat, and sensible heat fluxes over a crop surface[J]. Bound-Lay Meteorol., 29: 263～272.
[2]Aubinet M, et al. 2000. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of European forests:the EUROFLUX methodology[J].Adv. Ecol. Res.,30:113～176.
[3]Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP. 1998. On eco-physiological micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water and trace gas fluxes over vegetation :a perspectives[J].Agric. For. Meteorol. ,90:1～25.
[4]Bowen IS. 1926. The ratio of heat losses by conductance and by evaporation from any water surface[J]. Phys. Rev., 27: 779～787.
[5]Businger JA, Oncley SP. 1990. Flux measurement with conditional sampling[J]. J. Atmos . Ocean Technol. , 7: 349～352.
[6]Clark KL, et al. 1999. Environmental controls over net exchanges of carbon dioxide from contrasting florida ecosystems[J]. Ecol. Appl., 9: 936～948.
[7]Desjardins RL. 1977. Description and evaluation of a sensible heat flux detector[J]. Bound-Lay. Meteorol., 11: 147～154.
[8]Fang JY, et al. 2001. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998[J]. Science, 292:2320～2322.
[9]Finnigan J J, Leuning R. 2000. Long term flux measurements-coordinate system and averaging[A]. In: CGER(eds). Proceedings of International Workshop for Advanced Flux Network and Flux Evaluation[C]. Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University, 51～56.
[10]Goulden ML, et al. 1996. Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy[J]. Global Change Biol., 2:169～182.
[11]Law BE, et al. 2000. Measuring and modeling seasonal variation of carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of a Pinus ponderosa forest subjected to soil water deficit[J]. Global Change Biol., 6:613～630.
[12]Lee X. 1998. On micrometeorological observation of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation[J]. Agric. For. Meteorol., 91:39～49.
[13]Lenschow DH. 1995. Micrometeorological techniques for measuring biosphere-atmosphere trace gas exchange[A]. In: Mattoon PA.(ed). Biogenic Emissions Trace Gases: Measuring From Soil and Water[C]. Oxford: Blacwell Science. 126～63.
[14]Lindroth A, Grelle A, Moren AS. 1998. Long-term measurements of boreal forest carbon balance reveal large temperature sensitivity[J]. Global Change Biol., 4:443～450.
[15]Lloyd J, Taylor JA. 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration[J]. Fun. Ecol., 8: 315～323.
[16]Lloyd J, et al. 2000. The carbon balance of a central Siberian forest[A]. In: CGER(eds). Proceedings of International Workshop for Advanced Flux Network and Flux Evaluation[C]. Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido University, 39～45.
[17]Malhi Y, Baldocchi DD, Jarvis PG. 1999. The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forests[J]. Plant Cell Environ.,22:715～740.
[18]Medlyn BE, et al. 2000. Soil process dominate the long-term response of forest net primary productivity to increased temperature and atmospheric CO₂ concentration[J]. Can. J. For. Res.,30:873～888.
[19]Moncrieff J, et al. 1997. Trace gas exchange over terrestrial ecosystems:methods and perspectives in micrometeorology[J]. J.Exp. Bot., 48:1133～1142.
[20]Monin AS, Yaglom AM. 1971. Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence[M]. Cambridge: M. I. T. Press, 769.
[21]Mori S, et al. 2000. Daytime whole-tree respiration of Larix gmellini trees in middle Siberia[A]. In :Fukuda M.(eds). Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on the Joint Siberian Permafrost Studies between Japan and Russia[C]. Tsukuba Japan:NIES, 55～58.
[22]Monteith JL, Szeicz G. 1960. The carbon-dioxide flux over a field of sugar beet[J]. Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 86: 205～214.
[23]Monteith JL, Unsworth MH. 1990. Principles of Environmental Physics, 2nd ed[M]. London:Arnold, 289.
[24]Musgrave RB, Moss DN. 1961. Photosynthesis under field conditions. Ⅰ . A portable, closed system for determining net assimilation and respiration of corn[J]. Crop Sci., 1:37～41.
[25]NIES. 2000. Pamphlet for National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan[M].Tsukuba:NIES.33～34.(in Japanese)
[26]Ninomiya I, Hozumi K.1981.Respiration of forest trees. 1. Measurement of respiration of Pinus densithunbergii UYEKI by an enclosed standing tree method[J]. J . Jpn. For. Soc., 63: 8～18.
[27]Pacala SW, et al. 2001. Consistent land- and atmosphere-based U. S. carbon sink estimates[J]. Science, 292: 2316～2319.
[28]Raupach MR. 1988.Canopy transport processes[R]. In:Steffen WL.(eds). Flow and Transport in the Natural Environment:Advances and Applications[C]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 95～97.
[29]Schulze ED, et al. 1999. Productivity of forests in the Eurosiberia boreal region and their potential to act as a carbon sink-a synthesis[J]. Global Change Biol., 5: 703～722.
[30]Speer ER, et al. 1985. Test of a prototype eddy accumulator for measuring atmospheric vertical fluxes of water vapor and particulate sulfate[J]. J. Geophysical Res., 90: 2119～2122.
[31]UNEP. 1999. Global Environment Outlook 2000[R]. United Nations Environment Programme, 7～8.
[32]Valentini R, et al. 2000. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests[J]. Nature, 404:861～865.
[33]Verma SB, et al. 1986. Eddy fluxes of CO₂ water vapor and sensible heat over adeciduous forest[J]. Bound-Lay. Meteorol.,36: 71～96.
[34]Wang YP, Jarvis PG. 1990. Description and validation of an array model- MAESTRO[J]. Agric. For. Meteorol., 51: 257～280.
[35]Wang YP, McMurtrie RE, Landsberg JJ. 1992. Modeling canopy photosynthetic productivity[A]. In: Baker NR.(ed). Crop Photosynthesis: Spatial and Temporal Determinants[C]. Oxford: Elsevier, 43～67.
[36]Waring RH, Running SW. 1998. Forest ecosystems: analysis at multiple scales[M]. San Diego:Academic Press, 1～10.
[37]Wilson KB. 2000. Evidence of drainage flow at an eddy covariance site[A]. In: CGER(eds). Proceedings of International Workshop for Advanced Flux Network and Flux Evaluation[C].Sapporo, Japan. 47～49.
[38]Williams M, et al. 1996. Modeling the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in a Quercus-Acer stand at Harvard Forest:the regulation of stomatal conductance by light, nitrogen and soil/plant hydraulic properties[J]. Plant Cell Environ., 19: 911～927.
[39]Xu M, BeBoase TA, Qi YA 2000. simple technique to measure stem respiration using a horizontally oriented soil chamber[J].Can. J. For. Res., 30:1555～1560.
[40]Yamamoto S, et al. 1999. Seasonal and inter-annual variation of CO₂ flux between a temperate forest and the atmosphere in Japan[J]. Tellus, 51B:401～413.

森林生态系统CO₂通量的研究方法及研究进展

Study method and research advance in forest CO₂ flux

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王思敏, 张红丽, 张恒硕, 左启林, 查同刚. 晋西黄土区典型小流域不同土层土壤容重分布特征及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(3): 609-615.
[2]	张秦泽, 郝广, 李洪远. 外源输入氮的有效性及形态对植物生长与生理影响的研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(3): 878-887.
[3]	李晓燕, 李永慧, 秦文萍, 孙羽, 马志雯, 刘翔. 人工草地建植对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤有机碳组分的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 50-56.
[4]	格日乐其木格, 乌兰图雅, 斯琴朝克图, 包木苏. 内蒙古草地质量对牧户生计脆弱性的影响评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 216-223.
[5]	唐敬超, 黄昱, 孙宝娣, 宋志文, 徐爱玲. 大气颗粒物对植物影响研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 254-263.
[6]	胡亚伟, 施政乐, 刘畅, 徐勤涛, 张建军. 晋西黄土区刺槐林密度对林下植物多样性及土壤理化性质的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2072-2080.
[7]	马静, 余克服. 大规模白化对珊瑚礁生态系统的影响研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2227-2240.
[8]	张富荣, 金亮, 叶勇. 厦门海沧湾红树林恢复区水体浮游植物群落组成与物种多样性的时空分布 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(7): 1604-1609.
[9]	李晨笛, 杨小波, 李东海, 史建康, 赵俊福, 李龙, 陈琳, 张培春, 田璐嘉. 海南中部山区天然林群落结构与多样性变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3): 513-523.
[10]	于晶晶, 丛微, 丁易, 靳利晓, 张于光. 不同干扰方式下热带雨林土壤微生物群落自然恢复特征和构建机制 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3): 534-543.
[11]	李露航, 类延宝, 陈秋捷, 邓先智, 包寒阳, 扎琼巴让, 孙庚. 若尔盖高寒沙化草地恢复过程中土壤全碳和植物根系特征的变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(2): 282-290.
[12]	邹雨函, 朱涛, 王雪宏, 于君宝, 凌越, 李雪, 张馨. 贮存时间对盐地碱蓬种子萌发及生长特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(10): 2345-2350.
[13]	窦文清, 贾伟涛, 张久红, 易雪梅, 温兆飞, 吴胜军, 马茂华. 三峡水库消落带植被现状、适生策略及生态修复研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(1): 208-218.
[14]	邵鹏帅, 韩红艳, 孙景宽. 黄河三角洲湿地退化和恢复对柽柳土壤有机碳含量及红外碳组分的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1258-1265.
[15]	李枭, 曹昀, 谢芹招, 尧晓晨, 汤思文, 冯凯品. 水位变化及退水恢复对藜蒿生长和生理的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1109-1120.