西双版纳聚果榕榕果小蜂种间联结性研究

生态学杂志 ›› 2003, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 20-26.

西双版纳聚果榕榕果小蜂种间联结性研究

张光明¹, 杨大荣¹, 徐磊¹, 彭艳琼¹, 卢耀²

1. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园, 勐腊, 666303;
2. 思茅师范高等专科学校, 思茅, 665000

收稿日期:2002-09-23 修回日期:2002-11-15 出版日期:2003-04-10
通讯作者: 张光明,男,1968年生,硕士,助研.目前主要从事群落生态演替和协同进化研究,发表论文10余篇.
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重要项目(KSCX2-SW-105);国家自然科学基金(30170171);中国科学院特别支持费(STZ-01-18);云南省应用基础基金资助项目(2000C0083M),(2001C0065M)

Species associations of fig wasps associated with Ficus racemosa in Xishuangbanna

ZHANG Guangming¹, YANG Darong¹, XU Lei¹, PENG Yanqiong¹, LU Yao ²

1. Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China;
2. Simao Junior Teacher's College, Simao 665000, China

Received:2002-09-23 Revised:2002-11-15 Online:2003-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应用方差比率法、2× 2列联表的 χ² 检验、联结系数、点相关系数、共同出现百分率、Pearson相关系数和秩相关系数等多指数比较的方法研究了西双版纳聚果榕榕果小蜂的种间联结性。研究表明,西双版纳聚果榕榕果小蜂种间总体联结性表现为极显著。 2× 2列联表的 χ²检验不能反映所研究昆虫种间联结性的真实情况。 6个聚果榕榕果小蜂种间共同出现率普遍较高。小蜂种间的联结程度多属极显著(对于联结系数 15个种对中有 10个,对于秩相关系数15个种对中有 12个)。传粉者Ceratosolenfusciceps同其它小蜂间的联结显著性最高,其中与Platyneuratestacea和P .mayri呈极显著负联结,与P .agraensis呈极显著正联结,但与Apoc rypta属 2小蜂的关系尚不十分明晰。Platyneura属 3种小蜂彼此之间呈极显著或显著的负联结关系,而Apocrypta属内 2个种之间呈极显著正联结。文章对该 6种榕果小蜂种间连接关系形成的原因及进化生态学后果作了较详尽的讨论。

关键词: 生态动力预报, 物候学, 数值天气预报, 数理逻辑, 模式识别

Abstract: Comparisons among different calculation methods were conducted in order to analyze the species associations of fig wasps associated with Ficus racemosa in Xishuangbanna,SW China.The results indicated that interspecific associations were highly significant(P <0.01).Pollinator(Ceratosolen fusciceps)had the highest significant associations with other species, negatively with Platyneura testacea and P.mayri,while positive with P.agraensis .There were highly significant negative associations among 3 species within genus Platyneura,whereas,a highly significant positive association occurred between the 2 species of genus Apocrypta .The interspecific association relationship was not clear yet for pollinator and Apocrypta species.Semi-matrices diagrams and constellation diagrams were applied to show species associations of fig wasps.The causes and evolutionary effects of species association status of 6 fig wasp species were also discussed.

Key words: Ecological dynamic forecasting, Phenology, Numerical weather prediction, Mathematical logic, Pattern recognition

中图分类号:

Q969.54

张光明, 杨大荣, 徐磊, 彭艳琼, 卢耀. 西双版纳聚果榕榕果小蜂种间联结性研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2003, (4): 20-26.

ZHANG Guangming, YANG Darong, XU Lei, PENG Yanqiong, LU Yao . Species associations of fig wasps associated with Ficus racemosa in Xishuangbanna[J]. cje, 2003, (4): 20-26.

参考文献

[1] 马炜梁,陈勇,李宏庆.1997.榕树及其传粉者研究综述[J].生态学报,17(2):209～215.
[2] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.1998.中国植物志(第二十三卷,第一分册)[M].北京:科学出版社,122～123.
[3] 王伯荪,彭少麟.1983.鼎湖山森林群落分析Ⅱ.物种联结性[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),22(4):27～35.
[4] 王方海,古德祥.2001.寄生蜂寄生过程中对寄主主要器官发育的影响[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),40(5):76～79.
[5] 吴征镒.1995.云南植物志(第六卷)[M].北京:科学出版社,625～627.
[6] 朱华.1992.西双版纳望天树林的群落生态学研究[J].云南植物研究,14(3):237～258.
[7] 张克映.1963.滇南气候的特征及其形成因子的初步分析[J].气象学报,33(2):218～230.
[8] 张峰,上官铁梁.2000.山西翅果油树群落种间关系的数量分析[J].植物生态学报,24(3):351～355.
[9] 张金屯.1995.植被数量生态学方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,79～86.
[10] 周先叶,等.2000.广东黑石顶自然保护区森林次生演替过程中群落的种间联结性分析[J].植物生态学报,24(3):332～339.
[11] 郑元润.1998大青沟残遗森林植物群落特点及物种联结性研究[J].植物学通报,15(5):44～49.
[12] 欧祖兰,等.2002.元宝山冷杉群落主要树木种群间连接关系的研究[J].生态学杂志,21(1):14～18.
[13] 杨大荣,等.2000.西双版纳热带雨林聚果榕小蜂季节性变化规律[J].林业科学研究,13(5):477～484.
[14] 杨大荣,等.2001.西双版纳热带雨林聚果榕小蜂的传粉生态学[J].动物学研究,22(2):125～130.
[15] 钦俊德.1987.昆虫与植物的关系[M].北京:科学出版社.
[16] 钦俊德,王琛柱.2001.论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系[J].昆虫学报,44(3):360～365.
[17] Anstett MC, Bronstein JL, Hossaert McKey M. 1996. Resource allocation: a conflict in the fig/fig wasp mutualism[J]? J. Evol.Biol., 9:421～428.
[18] Anstett MC, Hossaert Mc Key M, Kjellberg F. 1997. Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism[J].Trends Ecol. Evol., 12: 94～99.
[19] Berg CC. 1989. Classification and distribution of Ficus[J]. Experientia, 45: 605～611.
[20] Bronstein JL. 1991.The nonpollinating wasp fauna of Ficus pertusa: exploitation of a mutualism[J]. Oikos, 61(2): 175～186.
[21] Cole LC. 1949.The measurement of interspecific association[J].Ecology, 30(4):411～424.
[22] Compton SG, Rasplus JY, Ware AB. 1994.African fig wasp parasitoid communities[A]. In: Hawkins BA.(eds). Parasitoid Community Ecology[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 343～368.
[23] Galil J, Eisikowitch D. 1968. On the pollination ecology of Ficus sycomorus in east Africa[J]. Ecology, 49(2): 259～269.
[24] Ganeshaiah KN, Kathuria P, Shaanker R U. 1999. Does optimal packing of flowers in syconia shape style length variation in monoecious figs[J] ? Biotropica, 31(2): 312～320.
[25] Hawkins BA, Compton SG. 1992. African fig wasp communities:underssturation and latitudinal gradients in species richness[J].J. Anim. Ecol., 61: 361～372.
[26] Herre EA. 1987. Optimality, plasticity and selective regime in fig wasp sex ratio[J]. Nature, 329: 627～329.
[27] Herre EA, West SA. 1997. Conflict of interest in a mutualism:documenting the elusive fig wasp-seed trade off[J]. Proc. R.Soc. Lond., B, 264:1501～1507.
[28] Herre EA, et al. 1997. Fig-associated wasps: Pollinators and parasites, sex-ratio adjustment and male polymorphism, population structure and its consequences[A]. In: Cboe J C.(eds). The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arthropods[C]. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press, 226～239.
[29] Janzen DH. 1979.Howtobeafig[J]? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.,10(1):13～51.
[30] Kerdelhue C, Rasplus JY. 1996. Non-pollinating Afrotropical fig wasps affect the fig-pollinator mutualism in Ficus within the subgenus Sycomorus[J]. Oikos, 75(1):3～14.
[31] Kerdelhue C, Rasplus JY. 1996. The evolution of dioecy among Ficus(Moraceae): an alternative hypothesis involving non-pollinating fig wasp pressure on the fig-pollinator mutualism[J].Oikos, 77(1): 163～166.
[32] Kerdelhue C, Rossi JP, Rasplus JY. 2000. Comparative community ecology studies on Old World figs and fig wasps[J]. Ecology,81(10):2832～2849.
[33] Kjellberg F, et al. 1987. The stability of the symbiosis between dioecious figs and their pollinators: a study of Ficus carica L.and Blastophaga psenes L.[J]. Evolution, 41(4): 693～704.
[34] Murray MG. 1987.The closed environment of the fig receptacle and its influence on male conflict in the Old World fig wasp,Philotrypesis pilosa[J]. Anim. Behav., 35: 488～506.
[35] Nason JD, Herre EA, Hamrick JL. 1998. The breeding structure of a tropical keystone species[J]. Nature, 391:685～687.
[36] Patel A. 1998. Wasp competition in inflorescences of two dioecious fig species-implications for the fig wasp mutualism[J].Biotropica, 30(3): 474～480.
[37] Schluter D. 1984. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 65(3): 998～1005.
[38] Verkerke W. 1989. Structure and function of the fig[J]. Experientia, 45:612～622.
[39] Ware AB, Compton SG. 1994. Responses of fig wasps to host plant volatile cues[J]. J. Chem. Ecol., 20(3): 785～802.