欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2824-2833.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202409.038

• 污染与环境生态 • 上一篇    下一篇

混合生命周期方法的发展、应用与挑战

刘祚希1,魏莹莹1,李彦龙1*,于菲菲1,王姗姗2,薛冰3   

  1. 1沈阳航空航天大学, 沈阳 110136; 2辽宁省疾病预防控制中心, 沈阳 110005; 3中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016)

  • 出版日期:2024-09-10 发布日期:2024-09-14

Development, application and challenges of hybrid life cycle approaches.

LIU Zuoxi1, WEI Yingying1, LI Yanlong1*, YU Feifei1, WANG Shanshan2, XUE Bing3   

  1. (1Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China; 2Liaoning Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang 110005, China; 3Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China).

  • Online:2024-09-10 Published:2024-09-14

摘要: 混合生命周期评价方法(hybrid life cycle assessment, HLCA)是过程生命周期评价(process-based LCA, PLCA)和投入产出生命周期评价(economic input-output LCA, EIO-LCA)相结合的产物。该方法扩展了系统边界,补充了废弃和使用阶段的环境影响,从而解决了单独使用其中一种方法而造成的局限性。本文介绍了不同HLCA方法的优缺点及应用案例。首先,分层混合生命周期评价方法(tiered hybrid LCA, TH LCA)易于使用和掌握,其结果覆盖范围广,但容易出现重复计算;其次,基于投入产出混合生命周期评价方法(I-O based hybrid LCA, IOH LCA)通过清单对投入产出表进行改进,完善了系统的边界,但由于投入产出表是基于部门层面的计算,缺少针对同一部门中不同产品的差异性评价;再次,路径交换混合生命周期评价方法(path exchange hybrid, PXC)通过过程数据对部分路径进行替换,减少了重复计算,但常因计算过程复杂而不易进行操作;最后,集成混合生命周期评价方法(integrated hybrid LCA, IH LCA)包含四部分矩阵和九部分矩阵集成混合两种形式。四部分矩阵最早提出集成混合生命周期方法,将投入产出表和过程数据集成在一个矩阵中,虽计算难度增加但结果更为精确,九部分矩阵在四部分矩阵的基础上增加了全区域产业链数据库,在不同区域和不同情景下分析全生命周期环境影响。通过对TH LCA、IOH LCA、PXC、IH LCA四种生命周期评价进行总结和分析,为未来HLCA方法的发展和应用提供参考。


关键词: 混合生命周期, 过程生命周期, 投入产出生命周期, 分层混合, 集成混合

Abstract: Hybrid life cycle assessment (HLCA) is an integration of process-based life cycle assessment (PLCA) and economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA). This method expands the system boundary and supplements the environmental impact of the abandonment and use phases, thus solving the limitations caused by using one of these methods alone. Here, we introduce four HLCA methods and their advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, the hierarchical hybrid life cycle assessment method (tiered hybrid LCA, TH LCA) is easy to use, and the results cover a wide range, but with doubling-counting. Secondly, the system boundary of I-O based hybrid LCA (IOH LCA) is improved by input-output list, but lacks of the comparison analysis, because all the products in the same economic department are shown with the same factors. It usually results in inaccuracy issues. Thirdly, path exchange hybrid life cycle assessment method (PXC) replaces some paths with process data, which reduces repeated calculation results, but the calculation process is complex and difficult to use. Fourthly, there are two forms of integrated hybrid LCA (IH LCA), namely four-part matrix and nine-part matrix. The four-part matrix is the earliest proposed integrated hybrid life cycle method. It integrates the input-output table and process data into one matrix, which increases the difficulty of calculation but improves the accuracy of the results. The nine-part matrix retains the four-part matrix and adds the whole regional industrial chain database to analyze the environmental impact of the whole life cycle in different regions and different scenarios. By summarizing the life cycle assessment of TH LCA, IOH LCA, PXC and IH LCA, this review provides reference for the development and application of HLCA method.


Key words: hybrid life cycle assessment, process life cycle, input-output LCA, tiered hybrid, integrated hybrid