欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 202-210.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202601.003

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河上游某规划电站上游鱼类栖息地评估和生境补偿筛选

王宇翔1,2,王翔3,杨志2,潘文光4,蔡露2,赵娜2,侯轶群2,石小涛1*   

  1. 1三峡大学水利与环境学院, 湖北宜昌 443002; 2水利部中国科学研究院水工程生态研究所, 水利部水工程生态效应与生态修复重点实验室, 武汉 430079; 3长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司, 武汉 430010; 4中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司, 西安 710065)
  • 出版日期:2026-01-10 发布日期:2026-01-09

Fish habitat evaluation and habitat compensation screening in the upper reaches of a planned power station in the upper reaches of the Yellow River.

WANG Yuxiang1,2, WANG Xiang3, YANG Zhi2, PAN Wenguang4, CAI Lu2, ZHAO Na2, HOU Yiqun2, SHI Xiaotao1*   

  1. (1College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China; 2Key Laboratory of Ecological Impacts of Hydraulic-Projects and Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystem of Ministry of Water Resources, Institute of Hydroecology, Ministry of Water Resources and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430079, China; 3Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430010, China; 4PowerChina Northwest Engineering Corp Ltd, Xi’an 710065, China).

  • Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-01-09

摘要: 为了给受黄河上游某规划电站建成后库区生境变化影响下的干流土著鱼类筛选适宜的生境补偿支流,本研究于2023年6月和9月对研究区内黄河干支流进行了栖息地质量评估和鱼类资源调查。利用遥感将研究区内黄河干支流划分为213个河段,并依据其环境指标数据进行聚类分组,从各组中选取代表性河段进行样方调查,参考定性栖息地评估指数(QHEI),运用加权平均模型计算出各支流的整体质量评估得分。结果表明:切木曲和格曲得分72.7、70.9,栖息地质量等级为较好,其他支流得分均<70,质量等级为一般或差。基于评分结果,将切木曲、格曲选为生境补偿的备选河流。在此基础上,将切木曲、格曲与龙羊峡以上黄河干流及生境良好的巴沟河、大河坝河和曲什安河进行适宜性比较分析。结果表明:在鱼类共有性方面,格曲、切木曲为58.82%,并不逊色于其他河流;在鱼类多样性方面,各河流Shannon多样性指数、Margalef丰富度指数分别为0.781~2.959、2.001~2.790,其中切木曲为2.324、2.215,格曲为2.959、2.138。最终,确定切木曲、格曲作为规划电站库区蓄水后的生境补偿河流。这一结果为后续该电站库区水电开发影响下的特有鱼类栖息地保护提供科学依据。


关键词: 黄河上游, 鱼类栖息地, 定性栖息地评估指数, 生境补偿, 鱼类资源

Abstract: To screen suitable habitat compensation tributaries for indigenous fish in the main stream affected by habitat changes in the reservoir area after the completion of a planned power station in the upper reaches of the Yellow River, we conducted habitat quality assessments and fish resource surveys on the main and tributary streams of the Yellow River in June and September 2023. Using remote sensing, the main and tributary rivers of the Yellow River in the study area were divided into 213 sections, which were then clustered and grouped based on environmental variables. Representative river sections were selected from each group for plot survey. Referring to the qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI), the weighted average model was used to calculate the overall quality assessment score of each tributary. The results showed that the scores of Qiemuqu and Gequ were 72.7 and 70.9, respectively, indicating good habitat quality level. The scores of other tributaries were all <70, indicating average or poor quality level. Based on the rating results, Qiemuqu and Gequ were selected as alternative rivers for habitat compensation. A comparative analysis was further conducted on the suitability of Qiemu〖HJ*4〗qu, Gequ, and the Yellow River main stream above Longyangxia, as well as Bagou River, Daheba River, and Qushen’an River with good habitats. The results showed that the fish commonality between Gequ and Qiemuqu accounted was 58.82%, which was not inferior to other rivers. In terms of fish diversity, the Shannon diversity index and Margalef richness index of each river ranged from 0.781 to 2.959 and 2.001 to 2.790, respectively. For those two variables, the values of Qiemuqu were 2.324 and 2.215, and the values of Gequ were 2.959 and 2.138. Ultimately, we determined that Qiemuqu and Gequ would be the habitat compensation rivers after the water storage in the planned power station reservoir area. Our results provide a scientific basis for the protection of the habitats of endemic fish species under the influence of hydropower development in the reservoir area of this power station.


Key words: upper Yellow River, fish habitat, qualitative habitat evaluation index, habitat compensation, fish resource