欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1793-1801.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202506.022

• 昆虫生态学专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

5种油茶蜂类传粉昆虫后足刚毛形态及分布特征

贾小琦1, 2,周峰3,潘军4,赵誉霞1,张威1,王开良1,舒金平1*
  

  1. 1中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所, 杭州 311400; 2南京林业大学, 南京 210037; 3衢州市林业有害生物防治检疫站, 浙江衢州 324000; 4遂昌县生态林业发展中心, 浙江遂昌 323300)

  • 出版日期:2025-06-10 发布日期:2025-06-03

Morphological structure and distribution of hairiness on the hindleg of five species of bee pollinators for Camellia oleifera.

JIA xiaoqi1,2, ZHOU Feng3, PAN Jun4, ZHAO Yuxia1, ZHANG Wei1, WANG Kailiang1, SHU Jinping1*   

  1. (1Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China; 2Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 3Quzhou Forestry Pest Control and Quarantine Station, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang, China; 4Suichang County Ecological Forestry Development Center, Suichang 323300, Zhejiang, China).

  • Online:2025-06-10 Published:2025-06-03

摘要: 蜂类传粉昆虫体表的毛发在植物花粉采集、传输及保障成功授粉过程中发挥着重要作用,但当前对其形态及分布特征的研究尚不多见。本研究采集并鉴定了大分舌蜂、油茶地蜂、萃熊蜂、中华蜜蜂及墨胸胡蜂5种油茶蜂类传粉昆虫,比较了5种蜂类后足的形态特征及各部分刚毛形态、长度、数量和密度等。结果表明:大分舌蜂、油茶地蜂、萃熊蜂和中华蜜蜂后足均具有花粉篮结构,其中大分舌蜂和油茶地蜂的后足结构相似性较高。5种蜂后足长刚毛可分为羽状长分支长毛、短分支长毛、端部长分支长毛、刺状分支长毛和无分支锥状长毛5种类型。5种蜂类种间后足刚毛的数量和密度存在显著性差异,种内后足腿节上刚毛的分布特征差异显著,进一步证实大分舌蜂、油茶地蜂和萃熊蜂是油茶较为理想的传粉昆虫。本研究明确了不同蜂类传粉昆虫后足刚毛特征性状的差异,探究了其与传粉功能的关系,为油茶传粉昆虫的保护和利用提供了理论参考。


关键词: 油茶, 蜂类传粉昆虫, 后足, 功能特征, 刚毛

Abstract: Hairiness on the body surface of bee pollinators plays an important role in pollination success by collecting and transporting pollen. However, few studies examined the morphological and distribution characteristics of hairiness of bee pollinators. In this study, five bee pollinator species (Colletes gigas, Andrena camellia, Bombus eximius, Apis cerana, Vespa velutina nigrithorax) for Camellia oleifera were collected and identified. We compared the morphological characteristics of the hindlegs, as well as the morphology, length, quantity, and density of the hairiness in each part of hindlegs of the five pollinator species. The results showed that all the five pollinator species except V. velutina nigrithorax had pollen basket structures in the hindleg, and the hindleg structure of C. gigas was highly similar to A. camellia. The long hair on the hindlegs of the five bees could be divided into five types: long hair with feather branches, long hair with short branches, long hair with long branches at the end, long hair with spiky branches, and cone-shaped long hair without branches. There were significant differences in the number and density of hairiness on the hindleg of the five bee pollinator species. The distribution characteristics of hairiness on different parts of the hindleg of the same species were significantly different. The differences in the hairiness characteristics of the hindleg further confirmed that C. gigas, A. camellia, and B. eximius were suitable pollinators for C. oleifera. By clarifying the differences in the morphological characteristics of the hairiness on the hindleg of different bee pollinators and their relationship with pollination function, this study provides theoretical reference for the protection and utilization of bee pollinators for C. oleifera.


Key words: Camellia oleifera, bee pollinator, hindleg, functional trait, hairiness