欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 2914-2926.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202109.018

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

典型生态屏障区生态安全格局构建——以承德市为例

胡秋红1,丛楠2*,殷国栋3   

  1. (1天津大学环境科学与工程学院, 天津 300350; 2中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室拉萨高原生态试验站, 北京 100101;3北京师范大学水科学研究院城市水循环与海绵城市技术北京市重点实验室, 北京 100875)
  • 出版日期:2021-09-10 发布日期:2021-09-17

Ecological security pattern construction in typical ecological shelter zone: A case study of Chengde.

HU Qiu-hong1, CONG Nan2*, YIN Guo-dong3   

  1. (1School of Environmental Science & Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 3Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Hydrological Cycle and Sponge City Technology, College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China).
  • Online:2021-09-10 Published:2021-09-17

摘要: 科学优化城市扩张和生态空间布局是国土开发顶层设计的迫切需求。区域生态安全格局构建可有效协调发展与保护的关系,进一步提升国土空间整治效率。本研究以京津北部生态屏障区——河北省承德市为例,基于生态系统服务评价结果,分别对林地、草地和灌木地等极重要区域进行识别,并结合特殊保护区域划定生态源地范围,最后利用最小累积阻力模型构建区域生态安全格局。本研究识别承德市生态源地13200 km2,占区域面积的34.22%;生态廊道由组团廊道和景观廊道共同构成,廊道将生态源地有效贯通,呈一横(雾灵山-都山)三纵(辽河源-茅荆坝、白草洼-御道口、白草洼-滦河源)分布态势;识别核心保护类和踏脚石类生态战略节点22个;低水平和高水平生态安全缓冲区分别为12550和11352 km2。生态安全格局构建结果在空间上可对不同类型自然植被形成有效保护,也与承德市保护发展规划相一致。本研究从方法上降低了植被分布异质性、净初级生产力差异对结果造成的不确定性,研究结果可为生态屏障区安全格局构建、国土空间整治与修复提供科学指导和技术支持。

关键词: 生态安全格局, 生态屏障区, 最小累积阻力模型

Abstract: Optimizing the spatial patterns of urban expansion and ecological space is an urgent need in toplevel design of land development. As a method for reconciling conflict between ecosystem conservation and urban exploitation, ecological security pattern (ESP) construction is important to improving the efficiency of land consolidation in ecological shelter zone, which is characterized by ecosystem diversity and ecosystem services. Chengde in Hebei Province is an ecological barrier area in the north of Beijing and Tianjin. According to the results of ecosystem services evaluation, we identified the most important zones of forest, shrubland, and grassland, and designated the ecological sources in combination with existing protection areas in Chengde. ESP was constructed based on minimal cumulative resistance (MCR) model. The area of identified ecological sources was 13200 km2, accounting for 34.22% of total area. The ecological corridors were 2160 km, including cluster corridors and landscape corridors, which were distributed in pattern of one horizontal direction (Wuling Mountain-Dushan Mountain) and three vertical directions (Liaohe headwaters-Maojing Dam, Baicao Depression-Yudao Pass, Baicao Depression-Luanhe headwaters). The corridors effectively linked up the ecological sources. In total, 22 ecological nodes were identified, which could be classified into two types as core nodes and stepping stone nodes. The areas of high and low-level ecosecurity buffer zones were 12550 and 11352 km2. Compared with the status and planning of land-use, most natural vegetation was effectively conserved, and the ESP was generally consistent with the pattern of Chengde’s environment protection and urban development strategies. The results indicated that the improved method reduced the uncertainty of ESP resulted from heterogeneous vegetation distribution and difference in net primary productivity among different vegetation types, and had well applicability in ecological shelter zone. Our results provide scientific guidance and technical support for territorial development and environment protection in ecological shelter zone.

Key words: ecological security pattern, ecological shelter zone, minimal cumulative resistance.