贵州某燃煤电厂周边春季大气颗粒物的汞污染特征

生态学杂志

贵州某燃煤电厂周边春季大气颗粒物的汞污染特征

仇豪¹,李金娟^1*,郭兴强¹,许议元²,蔡保德¹

（¹贵州大学资源与环境工程学院，贵阳 550025；²贵州大学喀斯特环境与地质灾害重点实验室，贵阳 550025）

出版日期:2018-05-10 发布日期:2018-05-10

Pollution characteristics of mercury in particulate matters around a coal-fired power plant in Guizhou Province in spring.

QIU Hao¹, LI Jin-juan^1*, GUO Xing-qiang¹, XU Yi-yuan², CAI Bao-de¹

(¹College of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China; ²Key Laboratory of Karst Environment and Geohazard Prevention, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China).

Online:2018-05-10 Published:2018-05-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为分析燃煤电厂周边不同粒径大气颗粒物及其中汞的污染特征，于2017年春季对贵州某燃煤电厂周边TSP、PM₁₀、PM_2.5进行样品采集，应用冷原子荧光汞分析仪对颗粒物中汞的浓度进行测定。结果表明：TSP、PM₁₀、PM_2.5的体积浓度范围分别为83.7～162、65.2～130、43.6～87.1 μg·m^-3，超标率分别为0、5.63%、25.7%。汞的体积浓度（Cv_(Hg)）分别为68.5～102、58.9～84.9、51.4～80.9 pg·m^-3；汞的质量浓度（Cm_(Hg)）分别为571～810、627～913、693～1083 ng·g^-1；从空间分布看，上风向颗粒物样品中汞浓度低于下风向，主导风向高于非主导风向，主要受当地风向和采样点位置影响。汞在颗粒物中的PM_2.5/PM₁₀和PM₁₀/TSP值分别为67.5%～95.2%、83.1%～98.8%，明显高于其相应的颗粒物质量浓度比值，表明汞主要在细颗粒物中富集。

关键词: 有机碳, 光合特性, 同化物积累与分配, ¹³C, 有机肥

Abstract: To analyze the pollution characteristics of mercury in particulate matters with different sizes, TSP, PM₁₀, and PM_2.5 samples were collected around a coal-fired power plant in Guizhou Province in spring of 2017. Concentrations of mercury in these samples were measured by a cold atomic fluorescence mercury analyzer. The results showed that the volume concentrations of TSP, PM₁₀, and PM_2.5 were 83.7-162, 65.2-130 and 43.6-87.1 μg·m^-3, which exceeded the limit level by 0, 5.63%, and 25.7%, respectively. he volume concentrations of mercury (Cv_(Hg)) in TSP, PM₁₀, and PM_2.5 were 68.5-102, 58.9-84.9, and 51.4-80.9 pg·m^-3 and the mass concentrations of mercury (Cm_(Hg)) were 571-810, 627-913, and 693-1083 ng·g^-1, respectively. Spatially, the concentrations of mercury in the samples collected at upwind direction were much lower than that at the downwind direction. Mercury concentration in the samples at dominant wind direction was generally higher than that at the non-dominant wind direction. Therefore, the local wind direction and sampling site influenced mercury concentration. The ratios of mercury in PM_2.5 to that in PM₁₀ were 67.5%-95.2% and the ratio between PM₁₀ to TSP were 83.1%-98.8%, which were higher than those of particle mass concentrations, indicating that mercury was mainly enriched in fine particles.

Key words: assimilates accumulation and distribution., ¹³C, organic carbon, photosynthetic characteristics, organic fertilizer

仇豪,李金娟,郭兴强,许议元,蔡保德. 贵州某燃煤电厂周边春季大气颗粒物的汞污染特征[J]. 生态学杂志.

QIU Hao, LI Jin-juan, GUO Xing-qiang, XU Yi-yuan, CAI Bao-de. Pollution characteristics of mercury in particulate matters around a coal-fired power plant in Guizhou Province in spring.[J]. cje.

[1]	谭季, 杨洋, 孙一萍, 黄佳芳. 亚热带河口养殖塘沉积物有机碳矿化及其影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 103-114.
[2]	袁梦, 邢稳, 罗美玲, 王玉峰, 谷学佳, 宋吉青, 娄翼来. 东北稻田有机肥替代部分氮肥措施下土壤酶群分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 123-130.
[3]	朱依凡, 孙兆林, 王清奎. 生物炭和氮添加对亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤有机碳分解与平衡的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(9): 2851-2859.
[4]	刘敏, 孙经国, 徐兴良. 土壤元素失衡是导致高寒草甸退化的重要诱因 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(8): 2574-2580.
[5]	池鑫晨,宋超,朱向涛,王楠,王晓雨,白尚斌. 毛竹入侵常绿阔叶林对土壤活性有机碳氮的动态影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2263-2272.
[6]	朱凤婷,李奥,于晓曼,孟博,白金衡,王厚鑫,刘鸣达,马殿荣. 有机与常规培肥模式生产水稻的碳足迹 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2233-2241.
[7]	钱虹宇,周宏鑫,罗原骏,蒲玉琳,张世熔,李婷,贾永霞. 土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数对高寒湿地退化的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2273-2282.
[8]	闫丽飞,杨庆朋,关欣,黄苛,张诗萌,赵峰侠. 亚热带地区马尾松树干呼吸碳同位素组成的时间变化特征及其控制因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(6): 1911-1920.
[9]	白皓宇,杨智杰,郑永,熊德成,周嘉聪. 增温对亚热带森林土壤可浸提有机碳的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(5): 1436-1444.
[10]	吉春阳，冯竞仙，何云华，孙小飞，李守中，尹云锋. 退化设施蔬菜地修复过程中土壤可溶性有机碳与无机氮动态 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(5): 1575-1582.
[11]	郭利娜,贾羽旋,李彤,刘衎,张智博,谢军飞,石生伟. 森林溶解性有机碳淋溶驱动机制及模拟研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(5): 1723-1733.
[12]	胡海清，罗斯生,罗碧珍,魏书精,王振师. 林火干扰对广东省桉树林生态系统碳密度的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 1067-1074.
[13]	苑亚茹,韩晓增,李娜,尤孟阳,邹文秀. 不同熟化措施对黑土母质发育的新成土壤有机碳库的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 1175-1182.
[14]	王庆鲁,祝鹏飞,丁凡. 地膜覆盖和有机肥施用对农田土壤和作物C、N、P化学计量学的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 1191-1197.
[15]	丘清燕,杨钰,王浩,胡亚林. 易分解有机碳输入量对武夷山常绿阔叶林不同土层深度土壤激发效应的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 1153-1163.