不同颜色果袋对果园鸟害防治效果

生态学杂志

不同颜色果袋对果园鸟害防治效果

温立嘉¹,郭玉民^1*,高永宏¹,彭杨靖¹,刘润泽²,曲宏²,黄三祥²,黄建^1

（¹北京林业大学自然保护区学院，北京 100083； ^2北京市园林绿化局，北京 100013）

出版日期:2016-02-10 发布日期:2016-02-10

Effects of different color fruit bags on defending bird damage.

WEN Li-jia¹, GUO Yu-min^1*, GAO Yong-hong¹, PENG Yang-jing¹, LIU Run-ze², QU Hong², HUANG San-xiang², HUANG Jian^1

(¹College of Nature conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; ²Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry, Beijing 100013, China)

Online:2016-02-10 Published:2016-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为验证改变果袋外袋颜色是否可以降低鸟害影响，本研究于2013年和2014年对北京市延庆县佛峪口果园的部分苹果果实使用不同种颜色的果袋进行套袋处理。套袋总数：实验组1713，对照组1787。实验结果显示，果袋颜色与被鸟类破坏情况存在极显著差异（P<0.001），其中，钴蓝色果袋的防鸟害效果最好，破坏率为1.30%，其次是大红色和白色果袋，破坏率分别为2.11%和2.60%，均低于对照组原色果袋破坏率4.40%；黑色、群青色、熟褐色及青莲色的防鸟害效果较差，其破坏率分别为9.21%、8.60%、8.11%和6.90%，远高于对照组。建议今后生产中使用外袋颜色为钴蓝色的果袋。

关键词: 苹果树腐烂病菌, 娄彻氏链霉菌, 抑菌活性, 生物防治, 16S rDNA

Abstract: To investigate whether the color of packaging bags can reduce bird damage and economic losses of apples, we bagged the apples with different colors in Foyukou orchard, Yanqing County, Beijing during 2013 and 2014. The total number of bags was 1713 for the experimental group and 1787 for the control group. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P<0.001) between treatments, and the bags with a cobalt blue color had the best protection against bird damage. The destruction ratio of apples was 1.30% with cobaltblue bags, followed by bright red and white with destruction ratios of 2.11% and 2.60%, respectively, which were still lower than the destruction ratio (4.40%) of the primary fruit bag color (the control). Bags with black, ultramarine blue, brown and pale purple had lower effects on protecting against bird damage compared with the control group, with destruction ratios of 9.21%, 8.60%, 8.11% and 6.90%, respectively. Therefore, we suggest that bags with cobalt blue can be used for the protection of orchard harvest.

Key words: Cytospora sp., Streptomyces rochei, inhibitory activity, bio-control, 16S rDNA

温立嘉1,郭玉民1*,高永宏1,彭杨靖1,刘润泽2,曲宏2,黄三祥2,黄建1. 不同颜色果袋对果园鸟害防治效果[J]. 生态学杂志.

WEN Li-jia1, GUO Yu-min1*, GAO Yong-hong1, PENG Yang-jing1, LIU Run-ze2, QU Hong2, HUANG San-xiang2, HUANG Jian1. Effects of different color fruit bags on defending bird damage.[J]. cje.

[1]	陈志杰,谢江辉,陈宇丰,周登博,高祝芬,戚春林. 一株植物病原拮抗细菌的分离筛选及拮抗物质 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1595-1604.
[2]	耿显胜,舒金平,彭瀚,张威. 基于高通量测序的3种竹子小枝真菌群落 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(11): 3493-3498.
[3]	杜瑾,郝建安,张晓青,王建艳,张爱君,王静. 一株分离自海水的产生物表面活性剂菌株的鉴定及其发酵优化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(5): 1378-1385.
[4]	郭靖1,章家恩1,2,3**. 福寿螺的生物防治现状、问题与对策 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(10): 2943-2950.
[5]	张靖宜1,2,张倩茹2**,项文化1,魏树和2,牟文燕2. 一株拮抗立枯丝核菌的放线菌筛选、鉴定及生理特性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(2): 394-399.
[6]	辛海峰1,孟艳艳1,李建宏1**,马鸿翔2,张旭2. 一株萎缩芽孢杆菌在小麦中的定植及对赤霉病的防治 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(6): 1490-1496.
[7]	王瑞龙1,2,3,陈颖1,2,3,张晖1,2,3,王子叶1,2,3,宫骁1,2,3**. 薇甘菊萎蔫病毒寄主范围、传播媒介和危害特点 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(1): 72-77.
[8]	李光明1,2,袁坤1,杨礼富1,陈秋波1,王真辉1**. 假臭草丛枝病植原体鉴定与多样性分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(12): 3179-3186.
[9]	武淑娇1,韩路1,吕杰1**,董建英1,祝有海2. 祁连山天然气水合物赋存区钻孔细菌多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(12): 3221-3227.
[10]	李旭,马福海,王秀娟,孙健,张惠文**. 大豆根腐病生防菌KJB04-11的鉴定及其产生的脂肽类抗生素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(06): 1453-1460.
[11]	黄先才,周子杨,孟玲,李保平. 稻鸭共作有机稻田蜘蛛多样性与飞虱数量的季节动态 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(07): 1342-1346.
[12]	黄露,杨德松,李保平,孟玲. 斑痣悬茧蜂的飞行能力和野外扩散行为 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(07): 1327-1331.
[13]	刘丽;段争虎;汪思龙;胡江春;胡治刚;张倩茹;王书锦. 不同发育阶段杉木人工林对土壤微生物群落结构的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(12): 2417-2423.
[14]	杨德松;孟玲;李璐璐;李保平. 斑痣悬茧蜂寄主搜索中的学习行为 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(10): 2026-2031.
[15]	刘兵;李宇; 叶倩;李太武;苏秀榕;李登峰;陈燕;史西志. 链状亚历山大藻共附生细菌多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(05): 889-894 .