黄海和渤海沿海地区生态系统健康评价

生态学杂志

黄海和渤海沿海地区生态系统健康评价

申丹^1,2,焦琳琳²,常禹^1**,胡远满¹,李泽鸣¹,史雅娟³,王铁宇^3

（¹森林与土壤生态国家重点实验室，中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所，沈阳 110016； ²中国科学院大学，北京 100049； ^3中国科学院生态环境研究中心，北京 100085）

出版日期:2015-08-10 发布日期:2015-08-10

Ecosystem health assessment of Yellow Sea and Bohai coastal areas.

SHEN Dan^1,2, JIAO Lin-lin², CHANG Yu^1**, HU Yuan-man¹, LI Ze-ming¹, SHI Ya-juan³, Wang Tie-yu³

(¹State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China; ^2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; ³Research Center for EcoEnvironmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

Online:2015-08-10 Published:2015-08-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着社会经济的发展，环境问题得到广泛的关注和重视，生态系统健康评价成为近年来生态环境领域的研究热点。本文以黄海和渤海沿海地区为研究区，以131个县区为评价单元。基于压力、状态和响应（PSR）模型，从人口、社会、经济、环境、景观、政策等方面综合考虑，根据社会经济统计数据和景观格局指数，构建了符合黄海和渤海沿海地区特点的生态系统健康评价模型，并计算出各评价单元的生态系统健康指数。结果表明：黄海和渤海沿海地区有84.73%的地区健康状况达到合格及以上水平；黄海和渤海沿海地区生态系统整体健康状况较好，系统对于自然和人工干扰有一定的抵抗力和恢复力，具备一定的自我调控能力。本文还分析了该地区所面对的各种潜在的压力，针对现状，结合这些潜在压力，提出了提高生态系统健康水平的建议。

关键词: 生长基质, 煤矸石边坡, 水环境, 植被恢复, 污染物, 城市污泥

Abstract: Environmental issue has received more attentions with development of the society and economy. Recently, ecosystem health assessment has been considered as a hot topic in the field of ecological environment. In this paper, we took the Yellow Sea and Bohai coastal areas, covering 131 counties, as the study area, and evaluated health level in each county that is identified as an individual evaluation unit. According to the latest data involving society and economy, we established the ecosystem health assessment model under the framework of PressureStateResponse (PSR). Multiple factors were taken into account in this model, including the population, society, economy, environment, landscape pattern and policy. Furthermore, we calculated the ecosystem health index in each county by the established model. The results showed that ecosystem heath levels in 84.73% of the study area reached the qualified level or above, indicating that the overall ecosystem in the Yellow Sea and Bohai coastal areas was relatively healthy and has selfadjustment ability resisting to natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Finally, this paper also analyzed the potential pressures threatening the ecosystem and provided suggestions for improving the ecosystem heath.

Key words: municipal sludge, vegetation restoration, coal gangue slope, harmful substance., water environment, growth media

申丹1,2,焦琳琳2,常禹1**,胡远满1,李泽鸣1,史雅娟3,王铁宇3. 黄海和渤海沿海地区生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态学杂志.

SHEN Dan1,2, JIAO Lin-lin2, CHANG Yu1**, HU Yuan-man1, LI Ze-ming1, SHI Ya-juan3, Wang Tie-yu3. Ecosystem health assessment of Yellow Sea and Bohai coastal areas.[J]. cje.

[1]	何欣月, 王宁, 刘均阳, 李秋嘉. 黄土丘陵区植物群落多样性及生物量随土壤水分梯度变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(1): 31-40.
[2]	潘政, 郝月崎, 赵丽霞, 孙扬, 李晓晶, 杨思德, 翁莉萍, 李永涛. 蚯蚓在有机污染土壤生物修复中的作用机理与应用 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(9): 3108-3117.
[3]	黄桥明, 黄俊, 吕茂奎, 熊小玲, 张世良, 谢锦升. 恢复年限、林下植被及季节对马尾松林土壤氮转化的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(8): 2556-2564.
[4]	潘复静,张伟,梁月明,王克林,靳振江. 喀斯特不同植被恢复阶段土壤有机酸季节变化与有效氮磷的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(4): 1112-1120.
[5]	卢德亮, 朱教君, 王高峰. 树木萌蘖更新研究进展与展望 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 4178-4184.
[6]	朱耀军, 马牧源, 赵娜娜. 若尔盖高寒泥炭地修复技术进展与展望 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 4185-4192.
[7]	哈文秀,肖桂英,曹建华,刘玉国,崔明,周金星. 喀斯特断陷盆地区不同恢复阶段群落物种组成与多样性特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(1): 36-45.
[8]	宁应之,万贯红,杨元罡,武维宁,周小燕,王一峰,刘娜,程晓,陈凌云. 甘肃省徽县不同退耕还林模式下土壤纤毛虫群落特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(6): 1697-1706.
[9]	任康,郭坤,郑景明,周金星,王进昌. 青藏铁路西格段沿线不同植被恢复模式的生态效益 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(3): 627-636.
[10]	赵霞,胡自航,郑景明,司莉青. 污泥与园林废弃物混合堆肥对波斯菊生长及重金属积累的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(3): 810-817.
[11]	刘尧尧,辜彬,王丽. 北川震后植被恢复工程植物群落物种多样性及优势种生态位 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(2): 309-320.
[12]	史戈,曾辉,常文静. 我国海岸带污染生态环境效应研究现状 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(2): 576-585.
[13]	王蕾,张宇婕,于亚军. 煤矸山复垦林、草地土壤有机碳差异及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(12): 3717-3722.
[14]	刘思洋,李雪华,骆永明,徐锰瑶,马晓彤. 围封和放牧草地植物多样性对氮添加的响应差异 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(12): 3635-3641.
[15]	张立娜,王芷茵,安婧,李茹. 水环境中三氯生残留对轮叶黑藻的生态毒性效应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(12): 3754-3761.