典型小流域农田土壤Cd形态分布及纳米羟基磷灰石阻控效果

生态学杂志

典型小流域农田土壤Cd形态分布及纳米羟基磷灰石阻控效果

蔡彤^1,2,刘静¹,刘孝利^1,2*,魏祥东^1,2,杜辉辉^1,2,铁柏清^1,2

(¹湖南农业大学资源环境学院，长沙 410128；²湖南省灌溉水源水质污染净化工程技术研究中心，长沙 410128)

出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-10

Spatial variation of agricultural soil Cd species and the nanohydroxyapatite resistance control in a typical small watershed.

CAI Tong^1,2, LIU Jing¹, LIU Xiao-li^1,2*, WEI Xiang-dong^1,2, DU Hui-hui^1,2, TIE Bai-qing^1,2

(¹College of Resources and Environment, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China; ²Technology and Research Center for Irrigation Water Resource and Quality Purification of Hunan Province, Changsha 410128, China).

Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 沿浏阳铁山河流域采集6个土壤样品（S1～S6），分析其Cd含量及形态空间差异特征，并结合室内淹水模拟实验，研究淹水条件下纳米羟基磷灰石添加量对不同样品Cd有效性与形态转化的影响。结果表明，从流域上游到下游，土壤总镉含量分别为1.14、1.37、1.98、7.44、7.45、6.99 mg·kg^-1，有效态Cd所占百分比依次为51.75%、40.15%、39.39%、16.40%、28.86%、29.76%，总量与有效态Cd的空间差异均非常明显，而有效态Cd所占百分比与土壤pH呈显著负相关。淹水可降低土壤Cd的有效性，且随着淹水时间延长，土壤有效态Cd逐渐向残渣态转化。添加纳米羟基磷灰石可明显降低土壤有效Cd含量，且随着添加量增加，阻控效果越好。当添加量为5%时，阻控效果最佳；与对照相比，S1～S6有效Cd含量分别降低了77.97%、83.64%、82.05%、77.87%、74.88%、73.56%。研究结果可为矿区小流域农业安全生产的分区管理和重金属污染治理提供数据支持与科学参考。

关键词: 柠条, 油蒿, 树干茎流, 土壤湿润锋

Abstract: Six soil samples were collected from Tieshan watershed, a typical mining small agricultural watershed in Liuyang City, which were used to analyze spatial variation of soil Cd content and its species. Effects of various nanohydroxyapatite addition doses on soil Cd availability and form transformation were examined using indoor flooding simulation experiment. Results showed that total Cd content in soils was 1.14, 1.37, 1.98, 7.44, 7.45 and 6.99 mg·kg^-1 from upstream to downstream of the watershed, with the percentage of available Cd being 51.75%, 40.15%, 39.39%, 16.40%, 28.86% and 29.76%, respectively. Spatial variation of soil total Cd and available Cd contents was highly significant in the watershed. The percentage of available Cd had significant negative correlation with soil pH. Flooding significantly decreased soil available Cd content. More available Cd transformed into the residual state with extension of flooding time. Soil available Cd content was decreased greatly with addition of nanohydroxyapatite, the effects of which were better with the increasing dose, being best at 5%. Compared with flooding alone, soil available Cd decreased by 77.97%, 83.64%, 82.05%, 77.87%, 74.88% and 73.56% in samples collected from sites S1-S6, respectively. The results can provide scientific reference for district management of safe agricultural production and control of heavy metal pollution in watershed scale of mining area in China.

Key words: Caragana korshinskii, Artemisia ordosica, stemflow, soil wetting front.

蔡彤,刘静,刘孝利,魏祥东,杜辉辉,铁柏清. 典型小流域农田土壤Cd形态分布及纳米羟基磷灰石阻控效果[J]. 生态学杂志.

CAI Tong, LIU Jing, LIU Xiao-li, WEI Xiang-dong, DU Hui-hui, TIE Bai-qing. Spatial variation of agricultural soil Cd species and the nanohydroxyapatite resistance control in a typical small watershed.[J]. cje.

[1]	张安宁,刘任涛,刘佳楠,赵娟,常海涛,陈蔚. 干旱风沙区柠条枯落物对土壤节肢动物群落的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2383-2391.
[2]	雷丽群,郑路,农友,刘士玲,李华,黄德卫. 降雨特征对红锥人工林降水分配格局的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(2): 460-468.
[3]	陈丽茹,李秧秧. 陕北水蚀风蚀交错带沙柳和柠条叶光合作用对降雨改变的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10): 2941-2949.
[4]	李巧燕,来利明,周继华,姜联合,杨柳,易三桂,孙清琳,郑元润. 鄂尔多斯高原草地灌丛化不同阶段主要植物水分利用特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(1): 89-96.
[5]	罗永红,闫兴富,孙毅,张金峰. 荒漠生境下柠条幼苗存活与生长对水分添加和沙埋的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1382-1390.
[6]	杨林,王明,王传华. 神农架地区次生林主要树种林冠雨的氮磷营养特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4): 1018-1025.
[7]	张金峰,闫兴富,孙毅,罗永红. 柠条种子萌发对不同光照强度和沙埋深度的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(11): 3262-3269.
[8]	王子奇,查天山,贾昕*,吴雅娟,张明艳,穆家伟. 油蒿光合参数季节动态及其与叶氮含量和比叶面积的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(4): 916-924.
[9]	闫兴富1**,刘建利1,贝盏临1,刘存德1,高永峰2,王瑞霞2. 不同光强条件下柠条锦鸡儿的种子萌发和幼苗生长特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(4): 912-918.
[10]	李媛1,2,查天山1,2,贾昕1,2*,秦树高1,2,吴雅娟1,2,王奔1,2. 半干旱区典型沙生植物油蒿（Artemisiaordosica*）的光合特性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(1): 86-93.
[11]	张捷,刘洋,张健**,欧江,崔宁洁. 马尾松人工林林冠层降雨再分配及其氮磷特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(6): 1451-1458.
[12]	张大治**. 宁夏荒漠草原景观柠条种实害虫的空间生态位 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(11): 2841-2847.
[13]	马全林1,2**,卢琦1,张德魁2,刘虎俊2,靳虎甲2. 沙蒿与油蒿灌丛的防风阻沙作用 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(07): 1639-1645.