大兴安岭北坡火烧迹地自然与人工干预下的植被恢复模式初探

生态学杂志 ›› 2003, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 30-34.

大兴安岭北坡火烧迹地自然与人工干预下的植被恢复模式初探

王绪高¹, 李秀珍¹, 孔繁花¹, 李月辉¹, 石秉路², 高振岭²

1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳, 110016;
2. 大兴安岭图强有限责任公司森林经营公司, 图强, 165301

收稿日期:2002-11-13 修回日期:2003-04-23 出版日期:2003-05-10
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(30270225);中国科学院知识创新资助项目(SCXZY0102)

Model of vegetation restoration under natural regeneration and human interference in the burned area of northern Daxinganling

WANG Xugao¹, LI Xiuzhen¹, KONG Fanhua¹, LI Yuehui¹, SHI Binglu², GAO Zhenling ²

1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shengyang 110016, China;
2. Tuqaing Limited Corporation on Forest Management, Tuqiang 165301, China

Received:2002-11-13 Revised:2003-04-23 Online:2003-05-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对大兴安岭北坡林区森林植被在不同火烧强度、火烧时间的火烧迹地上的恢复状况进行了调查研究.结果表明,轻度火烧区的植被自然更新恢复良好;中度火烧区的森林植被依靠人工促进更新要比自然更新更早达到预期目标;重度火烧区的森林植被如果完全依靠自然更新,恢复到预期目标会非常缓慢,而通过人工更新则可跨越几个演替阶段,较快接近本地的顶极群落.

关键词: 白姑鱼, 生长, 死亡, 南海北部

Abstract: This paper studied the vegetation in the burned area of different severities and ages of Northern Daxinganling. The result showed that natural vegetation regeneration in lightly burned area restores well. In moderately burned area, human-promoted regeneration develops faster than natural regeneration. In severely burned area, human reforested area will span several succession phases and approach climax community rather sooner than natural regeneration.

Key words: Argyrosomus argentatus, Growth, Mortality, Northern South China Sea

中图分类号:

S754

王绪高, 李秀珍, 孔繁花, 李月辉, 石秉路, 高振岭. 大兴安岭北坡火烧迹地自然与人工干预下的植被恢复模式初探[J]. 生态学杂志, 2003, (5): 30-34.

WANG Xugao, LI Xiuzhen, KONG Fanhua, LI Yuehui, SHI Binglu, GAO Zhenling . Model of vegetation restoration under natural regeneration and human interference in the burned area of northern Daxinganling[J]. cje, 2003, (5): 30-34.

参考文献

[1]王守信.1987.大兴安岭"五、六"特大森林火灾区恢复森林的考察报告[J].林业科技,55:22～24.
[2]刘新田,王守信,张亚珠.1994.大兴安岭森林火灾对环境的影响及迹地的天然更新[A].大兴安岭森林火灾对环境影响的研究[C].北京:科学出版社,135～139.
[3]陈伯贤,王义泓,齐明聪,等.1987.大兴安岭北部森林特大火灾后森林恢复问题的考察报告[J].东北林业大学学报,15(增):13～25.
[4]邵春海.1988.对图强林业局火烧迹地更新方式的意见[J].生态学杂志,7(增):71～74.
[5]肖笃宁,陶大立,徐振邦,等1988.大兴安岭北部特大火灾对森林资源及环境的影响[J].生态学杂志,7(增):5～9.
[6]李雪风.1987.大兴安岭盘中林场火烧迹地森林恢复的对策[J].林业科技,67:22～23.
[7]周以良.1991.中国大兴安岭植被[M].北京:科学出版社,205～216.
[8]周以良,乌弘奇,陈涛,等.1989.按植物群落生态学特性,加速恢复大兴安岭火烧迹地的森林[J].东北林业大学学报,17(3):1～10.
[9]杨树春,刘新田,曹海波,等.1998.大兴安岭林区火烧迹地植被变化研究[J].东北林业大学学报,26(1):19～23.
[10]罗德昆.1987.大兴安岭过火迹地更新方式的研讨[J].林业科技,53:10～12.
[11]郑焕能,胡海清.1990.火在森林生态系统平衡的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,18(1):8～14.
[12]赵大昌.1988.大兴安岭森林大火区的植被及其恢复问题[J].生态学杂志,7(增):35～40.
[13]徐化成.1998.中国大兴安岭森林[M].北京:科学出版社,41～43.
[14]舒立辅,左继春,田文涛.1996.大兴安岭"五、六"大火火烧迹地的天然更新探讨[J].林业资源管理,6:43～45.
[15]楼玉海,焦肇芳,等.1990.五、六特大森林火灾的调查分析[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江科学技术出版社,209～241.
[16]谭俊.1994.大兴安岭林区有林地退缩逆变浅析与对策思考[J].国土与自然资源研究,2:15～19.
[17]Fastie CL. 1995. Causes and ecosystem consequences of multiple pathways of primary succession at Glacier Bay, Alaska[J]. Ecology, 76:1899～1916.
[18]Grogan P, Bruns TD, Chapin FS. 2000. Fire effects on ecosystem nitrogen cycling in a Californian bishop pine forest[J]. Oecologia, 122(4):537～544.
[19]Halpem CB. 1988. Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communities[J]. Ecology, 69: 1703～1715.
[20]Turner MG. 1997. Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park[J]. Ecological Monographs, 4(67):411～433.
[21]Ward SC, Koch JM, Nichols OG. 1990. Bauxite mine rehabilitation in the Darling Range, Western Australia[J]. Proc. Ecol.Soc. Aust., 16: 557～565.