欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

免耕覆盖对不同质地土壤水分与作物产量的影响

刘连华,陈源泉,杨静,聂紫瑾,张建省,石彦琴,隋鹏**   

  1. (中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院/循环农业研究中心, 北京 100193)
  • 出版日期:2015-02-07 发布日期:2015-02-07

Effects of no-tillage with straw mulching on soil moisture and crop yield in soils with different textures.

LIU Lian-hua, CHEN Yuan-quan, YANG Jing, NIE Zi-jin, ZHANG Jian-sheng, SHI Yan-qin, SUI Peng**   

  1. (Circular Agriculture Research Center, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)
  • Online:2015-02-07 Published:2015-02-07

摘要:

采用空间位移法,将河北省吴桥县3种质地(砂土、砂质壤土、砂质粘壤土)的原状土转移到同一地点,研究了华北平原免耕覆盖下3种质地土壤的水分特征与作物产量。试验于2010—2013年开展,地点设在河北省吴桥县中国农业大学吴桥实验站。结果表明:相对传统翻耕,免耕覆盖可以增加土壤体积含水量,且在砂质壤土上的保水效果比其他2种土质更明显;砂质粘壤土免耕覆盖处理0~20 cm土层土壤体积含水量较传统翻耕处理低,不同于其他2种土壤;根据试验前2年结果,免耕覆盖并未显著提高作物的水分利用效率,小麦季趋势较为一致,砂土、砂质壤土和砂质粘壤土免耕覆盖的WUE比翻耕分别低13.95%、9.76%和8.61%;玉米季不同土质的趋势有差异,其中砂土免耕覆盖处理的WUE比翻耕低6.45%,而砂质粘壤土免耕覆盖处理的WUE比翻耕高4.89%,但差异均不显著;3种土质下,免耕覆盖相对传统翻耕没有表现出增产优势,小麦产量比传统翻耕分别降低7.09%、4.26%和0.39%,玉米产量分别减少9.81%、4.11%和10.19%。本试验条件下,免耕覆盖措施在3种土质均具有较好的保水效果,但短期内没有表现出增产趋势。
 

关键词: 红外光谱, 三维荧光, 氮沉降, 土壤溶液, 可溶性有机物质

Abstract: Sandy soil (S), sandy loam soil (SL) and sandy clay loam soil (SCL) were transported using the spatial displacement method to Wuqiao Station of China Agricultural University, Hebei Province for studying soil moisture and crop yield under no-tillage with mulch and conventional tillage during 2010 to 2013. The results showed that compared with conventional tillage, no-tillage with mulch increased soil volumetric water content, and the effect was more obvious on SL than on S and SCL; the soil volumetric water content of 0-20 cm under no-tillage with mulch was lower than under conventional tillage in SCL, which is different from S and SL. However, crop water use efficiency (WUE) was not improved under no-tillage with mulch according to the first two years experiment. The variation trend of WUE was consistent for the three soils in wheat growing season. WUEs under no-tillage with mulch were 13.95%, 9.76% and 8.61% lower than under conventional tillage in S, SL and SCL, respectively. In maize growing season, differences in WUE were observed among different soil textures. WUE under no-tillage with mulch was 6.45% lower than under conventional tillage in S, while the WUE under no-tillage with mulch was 4.89% higher than under conventional tillage in SCL, but the differences were not significant. No-tillage with mulch did not show advantage in yield increase. The wheat yields were 7.09%, 4.26% and 0.39% lower under notillage with mulch than under conventional tillage, and the maize yield was 9.81%, 4.11% and 10.19% lower than under conventional tillage in S, SL and SCL, respectively. Under the experimental conditions, no-tillage with mulch has a better effect on water conservation, but cannot increase crop yield in short term.

Key words: three-dimensional fluorescence spectra, infrared spectroscopy, nitrogen deposition, soil solution, dissolved organic matter