修枝对尾巨桉生长及光合生理的影响

生态学杂志

修枝对尾巨桉生长及光合生理的影响

任世奇^1,2,3,4,陈健波^1,3,4,周维^1,3,4,卢翠香^1,3,4,郭东强^1,3,4,邓紫宇^1,3,4,项东云^1,3,4**,肖文发²

（¹广西林业科学研究院，南宁 530002；²中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所，北京 100091；^3国家林业局中南速生材实验室，南宁 530002；⁴广西优良用材林资源培育重点实验室，南宁 530002）

出版日期:2013-11-10 发布日期:2013-11-10

Effects of pruning on the growth and photosynthetic physiology of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis.

REN Shi-qi^1,2,3,4, CHEN Jian-bo^1,3,4, ZHOU Wei^1,3,4, LU Cui-xiang^1,3,4, GUO Dong-qiang^1,3,4, DENG Zi-yu^1,3,4, XIANG Dong-yun^1,3,4**, XIAO Wen-fa^2

(¹Guangxi Forestry Research Institute, Nanning 530002, China; ^2Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; ³Key Laboratory of Central South Fastgrowing Timber Cultivation of Forestry Ministry of China, Nanning 530002, China; ⁴Guangxi Key Laboratory of Superior Timber Trees Resource Cultivation, Nanning 530002, China)

Online:2013-11-10 Published:2013-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用裂区设计连续实施2次人工修枝，研究了不同修枝强度（不修枝、轻度修枝（修去活枝冠层的1/4下层枝条）、中度修枝（修去活枝冠层的1/3下层枝条）、重度修枝（修去活枝冠层的1/2下层枝条）对尾巨桉生长及光合生理的影响。结果表明：修枝强度对胸径、树高和单株材积均无显著影响，其中主区重度修枝的胸径与不修枝基本一样，二者大于轻度修枝和中度修枝；树高基本一样；单株材积变化趋势与胸径变化趋势一致。第1次修枝以重度修枝对生长的促进作用最大，先后2次修枝互作效应较好的是重度修枝重度修枝、重度修枝不修枝和不修枝不修枝3个组合。4种不同修枝强度的净光合速率变化与生长变化趋势一致，主要受瞬时羧化效率影响；蒸腾速率不随修枝强度改变而变化；水分利用效率变化与生长变化趋势一致，其差异主要由净光合速率引起。综合考虑尾巨桉的水分利用效率、生长量最大化和可获得无节材长度3个因素，认为先后2次实施重度修枝重度修枝是最好的修枝方式。

关键词: 黏粒, 有机质, 三轴试验, 抗剪强度, 固结试验, 压缩-回弹

Abstract: With a splitplot experimental design, this paper studied the effects of different pruning intensities (no pruning, CK; light pruning, cutting 25% of whole canopy; moderate pruning, cutting 33.3% of whole canopy; and heavy pruning, cutting 50% of whole canopy) on the growth and photosynthetic physiology of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis. Pruning intensity had no significant effects on the diameter at breast height, tree height, and single tree volume. In the main plots, the diameter at breast height under heavy pruning was almost the same as that of CK, and was larger than that under light pruning and moderate pruning. The tree height in all treatments was basically the same, and the single tree volume had the same variation trend as the diameter at breast height. Heavy pruning had the best promotion effect on the tree growth in the 1st pruning practice. After carrying out the 2nd pruning practice, the tree growth under heavy pruning-heavy pruning, heavy pruning-no pruning, and no pruning-no pruning was slightly better than that in other treatments. Under the four pruning intensities, the net photosynthetic rate had the same variation trend as the tree growth rate, being mainly affected by instantaneous carboxylation efficiency. The transpiration rate was not changed with pruning intensity. The water use efficiency had the same variation trend as the tree growth rate, and the variation was mainly induced by the difference of net photosynthetic rate. Considering the water use efficiency, maximum growth, and length of wood without knot, it was suggested that the heavy pruning-heavy pruning could be the best manual pruning mode for the cultivation of E. urophylla×E. grandis.

Key words:

clay, oedometer test, soil compression-rebound, triaxial test, shear strength.

, organic matter

任世奇1,2,3,4,陈健波1,3,4,周维1,3,4,卢翠香1,3,4,郭东强1,3,4,邓紫宇1,3,4,项东云1,3,4**,肖文发2. 修枝对尾巨桉生长及光合生理的影响[J]. 生态学杂志.

REN Shi-qi1,2,3,4, CHEN Jian-bo1,3,4, ZHOU Wei1,3,4, LU Cui-xiang1,3,4, GUO Dong-qiang1,3,4, DENG Zi-yu1,3,4, XIANG Dong-yun1,3,4**, XIAO Wen-fa2. Effects of pruning on the growth and photosynthetic physiology of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis.[J]. cje.

[1]	孙美玲, 冶育芳, 赵志西, 马晓燕, 谢青青. 不同有机质对砷在针铁矿上吸附过程的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1115-1122.
[2]	商贵铎, 周卫军, 郑超, 刘瑞, 徐章倩, 崔浩杰, 周雨舟, 李敏. 湖南省耕地土壤硒空间分布及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(12): 2979-2986.
[3]	刘宇豪, 孔范龙, 李悦, 王康, 王文悦, 王晓燕, 王森. 溶解性有机质和纳米氧化锌共存对人工湿地处理性能及堵塞的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(12): 3019-3029.
[4]	刘晓彤, 黄金金, 张逸如, 李海奎. 基于广义可加模型的广东省森林土壤有机质影响因子 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(11): 2278-2288.
[5]	李博, 赵琼, 毛兵, 孙庆业. 我国东部主要类型土壤酸缓冲能力的影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(12): 3901-3910.
[6]	尚天浩, 毛鸿欣, 张俊华, 陈睿华, 王芳, 贾科利. 基于PCA敏感波段筛选与SVM建模的银川平原土壤有机质高光谱估算 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(12): 4128-4136.
[7]	王亦尧, 丁士元, 杨梦迪, 吕红, 崔高仰, 李晓东. 砷与天然溶解性有机质相互作用研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(9): 3127-3137.
[8]	吴汉, 常凤琴, 张虎才, 段立曾, 张晓楠, 彭卫, 张云, 刘琪, 刘峰文. 异龙湖近百年来湖泊沉积物有机碳、氮稳定同位素变化及其环境指示意义 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(8): 2478-2487.
[9]	韩增磊,肖敏,王中良. Landsat数据在解析太湖水体溶解性有机碳影响机制中的应用 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(7): 2446-2455.
[10]	邵鹏帅,解宏图,鲍雪莲，梁超. 森林次生演替和土壤层次对微生物群落结构的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(5): 1455-1463.
[11]	王立轩, 杨光, 高佳琪, 瓮岳太, 邸雪颖, 于宏洲. 兴安落叶松火烧迹地林褥层可溶性有机质的时间变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 3913-3923.
[12]	李仁杰, 杨立琼, 庄杰, 石亚楠, 陈希娟. 有机质和团聚体对双酚A迁移行为的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 4148-4156.
[13]	王清奎, 田鹏, 孙兆林, 赵学超. 森林土壤有机质研究的现状与挑战 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(11): 3829-3843.
[14]	陈思明,王宁,秦艳芳,邹小兴. 河口湿地不同土层有机质的水平异质性与自相关性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(9): 2805-2812.
[15]	张晓航,杨建英,赵惠恩,朱立娟,张森. 公路边坡喷播绿化初期根系特征及其对抗剪强度的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(5): 1528-1537.