Litter standing biomass and water-holding characteristics in typical primary and secondary forests in karst region of northwest Guangxi.
2011, 30(07):
1429-1434.
Asbtract
(
2219 )
PDF (597KB)
(
707
)
Taking three typical primary forests wing-hackberry (Pteroceltis tatarinowii), Chinese Loropetal (Loropetalum chinensis), Beautiful Sweetgum (Liquidambar formosana) and three typical secondary forests round-leaved tallow tree (Sapium rotundifolium), Chinese Alangium (Alangium chinense), and NegundoChaste-tree (Vitex negundo) in karst region of northwest Guanxi, Southwest China as test objects, a comparative study was conducted on the litter standing biomass, water-holding capacity, water-holding rate, and water-absorption rate. Among the test forests, Chinese Alangium had the largest dry litter standing biomass (3.3 t·hm-2), followed by round-leaved tallow tree (3.2 t·hm-2) and Beautiful Sweetgum (2.9 t·hm-2), while wing-hackberry had the least one (1.8 t·hm-2). The litter water-holding capacity in different type forests was in the order of Chinese Alangium > China Loropetal > Negundo Chaste-tree > round
-leaved tallow tree > Beautiful Sweetgum > wing-hackberry, and the litter potential water-holding rate in wing-hackberry, China Loropetal, Beautiful Sweetgum, round-leaved tallow tree, Chinese Alangium, and Negundo Chaste-tree forests was 301%, 342%, 224%, 253%, 288%, and 328%, respectively. The litter water-holding capacity and water-holding rate increased logarithmically with the increasing time of immersed in water. The litter water-absorption rate was the largest in China Loropetal forest, followed by in Negundo Chaste-tree, wing-hackberry, Chinese Alangium, and round-leaved tallow tree forests, and in Beautiful Sweetgum forest. The litter water-absorption rate decreased with time. To sum up, in karst region of northwest Guanxi, the litters in secondary forests had a larger water-holding capacity but smaller water-holding and water-absorption rates than primary forests, suggesting that the accumulation of litters in primary forests was of more eco-hydrological significance, compared with that in secondary forests.