欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1870-1880.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202406.033

• 恢复生态 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生态韧性的国土空间生态保护修复分区研究: 以洮河流域为例

王士莹1,谢保鹏1*,杨洁2,裴婷婷1,陈英1,蔺明芳1   

  1. 1甘肃农业大学管理学院, 兰州 730070; 2甘肃农业大学草业学院, 兰州 730070)
  • 出版日期:2024-06-10 发布日期:2024-06-20

Ecological protection and restoration zoning of national territorial space based on ecological resilience: A case study of the Taohe River Basin.

WANG Shiying1, XIE Baopeng1*, YANG Jie2, PEI Tingting1, CHEN Ying1, LIN Mingfang1   

  1. (1College of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China; 2College of Grass Industry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China).

  • Online:2024-06-10 Published:2024-06-20

摘要: 国土空间生态修复是落实生态文明建设战略的重要举措,科学划定生态修复分区是有序推进国土空间生态修复工作的基本前提。本文以洮河流域为例,构建“生态系统抵抗能力-生态系统恢复能力-生态系统适应能力”的生态韧性分析框架,评价洮河流域生态韧性,划定国土空间生态修复分区,并提出相对应的生态修复措施。结果表明:洮河流域生态系统抵抗力和适应力指标空间分异较大,低值区与高值区之间缺乏自然过渡;生态系统恢复力指标空间差异明显,由东北向西南生态系统恢复力等级越高;生态韧性空间上呈现循环分布特征。基于韧性评价结果:洮河流域国土空间生态修复分区划分为五大类型,其中低生态韧性脆弱区分布在流域北部,占流域面积的7.49%;生态适应力提升区主要分布在甘南高原,占流域面积的34.04%;生态恢复力提升区主要集中在流域中部偏北区域,占流域面积的6.39%;生态抵抗力提升区分布零,占流域面积的16.57%;高生态韧性保护区主要分布在流域中部,占流域面积的35.52%。根据分区结果提出以提高林草覆盖率、增加景观类型为主的基于自然的生态修复措施,以期为生态保护修复工作提供参考。


关键词: 生态系统抵抗力, 生态系统恢复力, 生态系统适应力, 洮河流域

Abstract: Ecological restoration of territorial space is an important measure to implement the strategy of ecological civilization construction. Scientific delineation of ecological restoration zoning is the basic premise for the orderly promotion of ecological restoration of territorial space. Taking the Taohe River Basin as a case, we developed an analytical framework for assessing ecological resilience, focusing on ecosystem resistance capacity, ecosystem recovery capability, and ecosystem adaptability. Using this framework, we evaluated the ecological resilience of Taohe River Basin, outlined the zoning for ecological restoration of the territorial space, and proposed corresponding measures for ecological restoration. The results showed that there were substantial spatial differentiations of ecosystem resistance and adaptability indices in the Taohe River Basin, and a lack of natural transition between low-value areas and high-value areas. Spatial differences in ecosystem recovery index were evident, with higher ratings of ecosystem recovery capability from north-east to south-west. Ecological resilience showed circular distribution characteristics in space. Based on the results of resilience evaluation, the ecological restoration zoning of territorial space in Taohe River Basin was divided into five types, among which the vulnerable areas with low ecological resilience were distributed in the northern part of the basin, accounting for 7.49% of the basin area. The improvement area of ecological adaptability was mainly distributed in the Gannan Plateau, accounting for 34.04% of the basin area. The area of enhanced ecosystem recovery capability depended predominantly in the northern-central sector of the basin, encompassing 6.39% of the total basin area. Conversely, there was no designated area for boosting ecological resistance, constituting 16.57% of the total basin area. The protected areas with high ecological resilience were mainly distributed in the middle of the basin, accounting for 35.52% of the basin area. According to the zoning results, nature-based ecological restoration measures are proposed to improve forest and grassland coverage and increase landscape types, in order to provide reference for ecological protection and restoration.


Key words: ecosystem resistance, ecosystem recovery, ecosystem adaptability, Taohe River Basin