Welcome to Chinese Journal of Ecology! Today is Share:

cje

• Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research advances in assessment of green GDP indicator.

XIU Rui-xue1; WU Gang1; ZENG Xiao-an1,2; SUN Jian-guo3;YU De-yong1   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; 2Department of Economic Construction, Ministry of Finance, People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100820, China;3Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Received:2006-09-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-07-10 Published:2007-07-10

Abstract: The study of green GDP and green national accounting systems area hotpot issues in ecology and economy, which play an important role in boosting the sustainable development of economy, society and environment. This paper introduced the concepts of green GDP, its intrinsic meanings, and theoretical foundations of how they came into being. The measuring pathways of green GDP and several indicators, such as genuine saving (GS), index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) and genuine progress indicator (GPI) were put forward, which could distinguish the economic activities being able to improve or impaire the sustainability of development. The applications of green GDP indicators in China and abroad at national and municipal levels were analyzed, and the relations of green GDP with ecological footprints and ecosystem services valuation were summarized. Suggestions on green GDP study were made, focusing on the resources and environment valuation methods. Some problems existing in the measurement of green GDP still need to be solved and improved in the future.

Key words: Forest soil, Exogenous iodine, Iodine-enriched wild vegetables