生态恢复评价的研究进展

生态学杂志

生态恢复评价的研究进展

杨兆平¹,高吉喜^1**,周可新¹,郑好²,王燕²,李慧敏³

(¹环境保护部南京环境科学研究所，南京 210042； ^2北京师范大学水科学研究院，北京 100875； ^3中国人民大学环境学院， 北京 100872)

出版日期:2013-09-10 发布日期:2013-09-10

Evaluation of ecological restoration: Research progress.

YANG Zhao-ping¹, GAO Ji-xi^1**, ZHOU Ke-xin¹, ZHENG Hao², WANG Yan², LI Hui-min^3

(¹ Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing 210042, China; ^2College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; ^3School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

Online:2013-09-10 Published:2013-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态恢复的快速发展迫使我们思考怎样的恢复才是成功的恢复，如何评价生态恢复是生态恢复学家面临的巨大挑战。当前生态恢复主要通过测量植被结构、生态过程和多样性指标进行评价，然而这些指标的变化未必能够明确指示包含在恢复过程中的内在关系。为了增强指标在指示恢复进程方面的逻辑性，应根据主导功能选择过程和结构性指标，基于此构建生态恢复评价指标体系。为了促进生态恢复评价研究，应加强生态恢复监测，建立生态恢复成功的标准，加强生态恢复评价指标体系研究，开展生态恢复项目的动态评价和强化评价结果对于理论及实践的指导。

关键词: 颗粒物, 二龙湖, 有色可溶性有机物, 东辽河, 吸收特性

Abstract:

The rapid rise of ecological restoration is forcing our consideration of what restoration being successful, and how to evaluate ecological restoration is a great challenge faced by the related scientists. At present, ecological evaluation is mainly implemented through the measuring of vegetation structure, ecological processes, and biodiversity, while the variations of these indices cannot be sure to definite the interrelationships between these indices in the processes of ecological restoration. To further understand the logic of these indices in evaluating the processes of ecological restoration, it should be to know which selected processes and structural indices representing the dominant ecological functions, and based on this, to build an appropriate evaluation indices system of ecological restoration. In order to promote the study on the evaluation of ecological restoration, it is suggested to strengthen the monitoring of ecological restoration, construct the ecological criteria for successful restoration, further study the ecological restoration evaluation indices system, implement the dynamic evaluation of ecological restoration projects, and intensify the theoretical and practical guidance of using the evaluation results.

Key words: particulate matter, absorption characteristics, East Liaohe River, CDOM., Erlonghu Reservoir

杨兆平1,高吉喜1**,周可新1,郑好2,王燕2,李慧敏3. 生态恢复评价的研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志.

YANG Zhao-ping1, GAO Ji-xi1**, ZHOU Ke-xin1, ZHENG Hao2, WANG Yan2, LI Hui-min3. Evaluation of ecological restoration: Research progress.[J]. cje.

[1]	韩静波, 张智, 张维康, 刘双芳, 彭泽群. 沈阳东陵公园不同功能分区空气颗粒物与负离子变化 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(9): 3099-3107.
[2]	仇豪,李金娟,郭兴强,许议元,蔡保德. 贵州某燃煤电厂周边春季大气颗粒物的汞污染特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1545-1549.
[3]	张维康1，2,王兵1,3,牛香1,3*. 不同树种叶片微观结构对其滞纳空气颗粒物功能的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(9): 2507-2513.
[4]	赵云阁1,鲁笑颖2,鲁绍伟3,4,谷建才1,陈波3,李少宁3,4*. 北京市常见绿化树种叶片秋季滞纳不同粒径颗粒物能力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(1): 35-42.
[5]	李亲凯1,2,杨周1,2,黄俊1,2,崔高仰1,2,李晓1*. 大气颗粒物稳定同位素组成的研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(4): 1063-1071.
[6]	吕铃钥,李洪远*,杨佳楠. 植物吸附大气颗粒物的时空变化规律及其影响因素的研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(2): 524-533.
[7]	徐晓梧1,宝乐1,莫莉2,徐彦森3,余新晓1*. 树皮对空气颗粒物的吸附能力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(12): 3242-3249.
[8]	王佳楠1,孟嘉伟2,杨凤霞3,蔡章3,4,刘杰3**. 多元排序法解析城市空气微生物时空分布 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(9): 2658-2664.
[9]	康晓明1，2，3,崔丽娟1，2，3**,赵欣胜1，2，3,李伟1，2，3,张曼胤1，2，3,魏圆云1，2，3,雷茵茹1，2，3,马牧源1，2，3. 北京市湿地削减大气细颗粒物PM_2.5功能 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(10): 2807-2813.
[10]	陈小平1,焦奕雯1,裴婷婷1,2,周志翔1**. 园林植物吸附细颗粒物(PM_2.5)效应研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(9): 2558-2566.
[11]	刘旭辉,余新晓**,张振明,刘萌萌,阮氏青草. 林带内PM₁₀、PM_2.5污染特征及其与气象条件的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(7): 1715-1721.
[12]	王晓磊,王成**,古琳,王艳英,王茜. 春季典型天气下城市街头绿地内大气颗粒物浓度变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(11): 2889-2896.
[13]	陈龙,刘春兰**,潘涛,陈操操,李铮,王海华,裴厦,孙莉. 基于干沉降模型的北京平原区造林削减PM_2.5效应评估 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(11): 2897-2904.
[14]	杨周1,2,李晓东1**,于静3,石友香3,杜锋3. 成都市冬季不同粒径大气颗粒物水溶性无机离子的变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(3): 682-688.
[15]	郭二果1,2,3,4,王成1,2**,郄光发1,2,蔡煜3. 城市森林生态保健功能表征因子之间的关系 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(11): 2893-2903.