基于FLUXNET的CLM模型总初级生产力模拟评价与误差分析

生态学杂志

基于FLUXNET的CLM模型总初级生产力模拟评价与误差分析

李睿^1,2,张黎^2,3*,景元书¹,李攀⁴,任小丽²,何洪林^2,3,吕妍^2,3

（¹南京信息工程大学，南京 210000； ²中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室，北京 100101； ³中国科学院大学资源与环境学院，北京 100049； ⁴天津大学表层地球系统科学研究院，天津 300072）

出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-10

Evaluation and error analysis of gross primary productivity using land surface model CLM over FLUXNET.

LI Rui^1,2, ZHANG Li^2,3*, JING Yuan-shu¹, LI Pan⁴, REN Xiao-li², HE Hong-lin^2,3, LÜ Yan^2,3

(¹Nanjing University of Information Sciences and Technology, Nanjing 210000, China; ²Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; ³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; ⁴Institute of Surface Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China).

Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 总初级生产力（gross primary productivity，GPP）的准确估计是陆地生态系统碳循环研究以及未来气候变化预测的基础。本文利用全球通量网的通量观测数据评估了CLM4.5的GPP模拟效果，结合叶面积指数（leaf area index，LAI）观测数据分析了CLM4.5模型GPP模拟误差的主要原因，并对CLM4.5模型主要的光合参数进行敏感性分析，探讨改善光合作用模拟精度的可能途径。结果表明：CLM4.5对GPP的模拟效果优于CLM4，月尺度和年尺度GPP模拟值的平均绝对偏差分别降低15%和29%。但与观测值相比，CLM4.5模拟的GPP年总量仍然具有较大偏差，平均偏差为366.06 g C·m^-2·a^-1。不同植被功能型GPP模拟误差具有不同的季节变化特征，误差主要发生在春季和夏季。冠层顶部比叶面积、叶片碳氮比和叶片氮含量中Rubisco氮含量所占比例是GPP模拟的3个敏感参数。未来应主要从物候期及LAI模拟的改进、磷循环过程的影响、生态系统水平光合参数集的构建等方面实现对GPP模拟精度的提高。

关键词: 汎河流域, 增强回归树, SWAT模型, 定量分析

Abstract: Accurate estimate of gross primary productivity (GPP) is the basis for the modeling of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle and climate change projection. We evaluated the performance of CLM4.5 simulated GPP and analyzed the causes of errors using observed GPP data from FLUXNET, combined with leaf area index (LAI） data. We conducted a sensitivity analysis to examine the key parameters in simulating GPP in CLM4.5 and discussed potential ways to improve the accuracy of photosynthesis simulation. Our results showed that CLM4.5 was better than CLM4 in simulating monthly and annual GPP. The mean absolute error (MAE) for the monthly and annual simulated GPP in CLM4.5 across plant functional types was reduced by 15% and 29%, respectively. However, CLM4.5 still presented a large bias in annual GPP with a MAE of 366.06 g C·m^-2·a^-1. The annual GPP bias had different seasonal variation for different plant functional types, with the bias mainly occurring in spring and summer. The GPP simulated by CLM4.5 was most sensitive to three parameters, i.e. specific leaf area, leaf carbontonitrogen ratio, and the fraction of nitrogen in Rubisco. The improvement in GPP simulation requires better modeling in phenology and leaf area index, P dynamics and C N P interactions, and a ecosystem-level photosynthetic parameter dataset.

Key words: Fanhe River watershed, boosted regression tree, soil and water assessment tool, quantitative analysis.

李睿,张黎,景元书,李攀,任小丽,何洪林,吕妍. 基于FLUXNET的CLM模型总初级生产力模拟评价与误差分析[J]. 生态学杂志.

LI Rui, ZHANG Li, JING Yuan-shu, LI Pan, REN Xiao-li, HE Hong-lin, Lü Yan. Evaluation and error analysis of gross primary productivity using land surface model CLM over FLUXNET. [J]. cje.

[1]	索炎炎, 张翔, 吴士文, 司贤宗, 李亮, 徐凤丹, 程培军, 李倩. 豫南夏花生种植区土壤pH时空演变及其驱动力 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 188-196.
[2]	张法伟, 李红琴, 罗方林, 王春雨, 王军邦, 马文婧, 杨永胜, 李英年. 基于增强回归树模型的三江源国家公园表层土壤储水及水源涵养功能的评估 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(12): 2471-2478.
[3]	苏佳佳, 刘志华, 焦珂伟, 于跃, 李凯莉, 吕秋爽, 房磊, 王文娟. 气候变化对中国林火干扰空间格局的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(12): 3810-3821.
[4]	李莹,黄岁樑*. 滦河流域未来土地利用变化情景的水文响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(7): 1970-1980.
[5]	焦琳琳1,2,3,常禹1**,申丹1,3,胡远满1,李春林1,马俊1,3. 利用增强回归树分析中国野火空间分布格局的影响因素 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(8): 2288-2296.
[6]	王学1,2,5,张祖陆2,3**,宁吉才4. 基于SWAT模型的白马河流域土地利用变化的径流响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(1): 186-194.
[7]	邓晓军, 杜家纬. 采用多次顶空固相微萃取分析拟南芥绿叶挥发性物质 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, (8): 970-974.