欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

环青海湖地区草地对气候变化和人类活动的响应

李玲1,张福平1*,冯起2,王虎威1,魏永芬3,李肖娟1,聂硕1,刘洁遥1   

  1. 1陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院, 西安 710119;2中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院, 兰州 730000;3日本国立岐阜-大学流域圈科学研究中心, 日本岐阜 501-1193)
  • 出版日期:2019-04-10 发布日期:2019-04-10

Responses of grassland to climate change and human activities in the area around Qinghai Lake.

LI Ling1, ZHANG Fu-ping1*, FENG Qi2, WANG Hu-wei1, WEI Yong-fen3, LI Xiao-juan1, NIE Shuo1, LIU Jie-yao1   

  1. (1School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China; 2Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resource, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China; 3River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Japan).
  • Online:2019-04-10 Published:2019-04-10

摘要: 以环青海湖地区为研究区,基于MODIS NPP数据、气象数据和Thornthwaite模型,估算了草地实际净初级生产力(actual net primary productivity, 简称NPPA)和潜在净初级生产力(potential net primary productivity, 简称NPPP),并将NPPP和NPPA的差作为人类活动对净初级生产力的影响(net primary productivity influenced by human, 简称NPPH),在此基础上,分析了草地NPPA的时空变化以及气候变化和人类活动对草地的影响。结果表明:2000—2015年,环青海湖地区的年均草地NPPA为176.93 g C·m-2·a-1;16年来环青海湖地区草地NPPA呈波动增加趋势,在空间分布上,草地NPPA从西到东呈逐渐增加的态势;16年来环青海湖地区87.42%的区域草地发生恢复,12.58%的区域发生退化,总体上草地以恢复为主;在气候变化和人类活动对草地恢复的影响中,由气候变化主导草地恢复的比例为10.98%,由人类活动主导草地恢复的比例为5.27%,而人类活动和气候变化共同主导草地恢复的比例为83.75%,气候变化和人类活动的共同作用是草地恢复的主导力量;在气候变化和人类活动对草地退化的影响中,仅由气候变化主导草地退化的比例为6.28%,由人类活动主导草地退化的比例为50.75%,两者共同主导的草地退化的比例为42.97%。可见,草地的局部退化主要是由于不合理的人类活动导致的,如过度放牧、草地开垦和土地覆盖变化等。

关键词: 杉木林, 毛竹林, 穿透雨, 林冠截留, 常绿阔叶林, 树干径流

Abstract: The actual (NPPA) and potential (NPPP) net primary productivity in the area around Qinghai Lake were calculated based on MODIS NPP data, meteorological data and Thornthwaite model. The difference between NPPP and NPPA was used to quantify the impacts of human activities on net primary productivity (NPPH). The temporal and spatial changes of grassland NPPA, as well as the effects of climate change and human activities on grassland were analyzed. From 2000 to 2015, the average NPPA was 176.93 g C·m-2·a-1. In addition, NPPA exhibited a generally increasing trend between 2000 and 2015. In terms of spatial distribution, NPPA increased gradually from west to east. 87.42% of the grasslands were restored, whereas only 12.58% were degraded between 2000 and 2015. For the effects of climate change and human activities on grassland restoration, the climate change, human activities and their combined effect of climate change and human activities contributed to 10.98%, 5.27% and 83.75%, respectively. For the effects of climate change and human activities on grassland degradation, the climate change, human activities and the combined effect of climate change and human activities contributed to 6.28%, 50.75%, and 42.97%, respectively. It is concluded that the grassland degradation in this area was mainly caused by irrational human activities, such as overgrazing, grassland reclamation and land cover change.

Key words: Chinese fir forest, Phyllostachys pubescens forest, evergreen broad-leaved forest, throughfall, stemflow, interception.