欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Meta分析的青岛市湿地生态系统服务价值评估

杨玲,孔范龙,郗敏*,李悦,王森   

  1. (青岛大学环境科学与工程学院, 山东青岛 266071)
  • 出版日期:2017-04-10 发布日期:2017-04-10

Ecosystem services assessment of wetlands in Qingdao based on metaanalysis.

YANG Ling, KONG Fan-long, XI Min*, LI Yue, WANG Sen   

  1. (College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China).
  • Online:2017-04-10 Published:2017-04-10

摘要: 为了解青岛市各湿地类型生态系统服务价值,本文应用Meta分析构建青岛市湿地生态系统服务价值转移模型,估算了青岛市各湿地类型的价值水平,并对模型的影响因素及有效性进行了探讨。结果表明:构建的青岛市价值转移模型中,污染防治成本法、生态价值法、涵养水源以及侵蚀控制等自变量的回归系数为正,其对青岛市湿地价值为正效应;而影子价格法、碳税法、旅行费用法、沼泽湿地以及湿地面积的回归系数为负,其对青岛市湿地价值表现为负效应;2012年青岛市各湿地类型生态系统服务单位面积价值为近海与海岸湿地(3.29×104元·hm-2)>河流湿地(2.38×104元·hm-2)>人工湿地(2.27×104元·hm-2)>沼泽湿地(1.77×104元·hm-2);与1997年相比,2012年总服务价值减少了8.01×108元;生态系统服务价值评估方法的使用、不同生态系统服务以及湿地面积之间的差异是影响青岛市湿地生态系统服务价值变化的重要方面;人们的重视及保护程度、当地的消费水平以及政府的投入是单位价值不同的主要原因;近海与海岸湿地生态系统服务价值的减少是湿地生态系统服务总价值减少的关键原因;Meta分析价值转移模型的有效性检验结果说明,当人力和财力资源受到制约时或当估值数据缺乏时,其可以作为快速评估湿地生态系统服务价值的一种有效方法。

关键词: 生态敏感性评价, 城市开发边界, MCE-CA模型, 义乌市

Abstract: To investigate the ecosystem service values of various wetland types in Qingdao, this paper used metaanalysis to estimate the ecosystem service value levels of various wetland types on the basis of wetland ecosystem service value transfer model, and explored the influence factors and effectiveness of the model. The results showed that the regression coefficients of independent variables such as pollution prevention method, cost control method, ecological value method, water conservation, and erosion control were positive, which had positive effects on wetland value in Qingdao. However, the regression coefficients of independent variables such as shadow price method, carbon tax method, travel cost method, marshes, and wetlands area were negative, which had negative effects on wetland value. The values of various wetland types were in order of onshore and offshore wetland (3.29×104 yuan·hm-2) > river wetland (2.38×104 yuan·hm-2) > constructed wetland (2.27×104 yuan·hm-2) > swamp wetland (1.77×104 yuan·hm-2). Compared with 1997, the value of wetland ecosystem services decreased by 0.801 billion yuan in Qingdao in 2012. The results indicated that the evaluation methods of the ecosystem service value, different ecosystem services, and the wetland area were the important aspects affecting the wetland ecosystem service value. Ecosystem service values of different types of wetland were different in Qingdao. People’s attention and protection effort, local consumption level and government investment were the main reason affecting wetland ecosystem service value per area unit. Compared with 1997, the reduction of offshore and coastal wetland ecosystem service value was the main reason for the decreased wetland ecosystem service value in Qingdao in 2012. Our results indicated that metaanalysis was a feasible method to evaluate wetland ecosystem service value when human and financial resources were restricted or valuation data was lacking.

Key words: Yiwu City, boundary spaces of urban development, eco-sensitivity assessing, MCE-CA model