欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 869-877.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202403.032

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵州省典型铅锌矿区和贵阳市居民汞暴露以及健康风险评估#br#

王达卫1,孔林2,徐晓航1,韩佳良1,刘杰民3*,仇广乐1
  

  1. (1中国科学院地球化学研究所环境地球化学国家重点实验室, 贵阳 550081; 2贵州医科大学公共卫生学院环境污染与疾病监控教育部重点实验室, 贵阳 550025; 3贵州省人民医院, 贵阳 550002)

  • 出版日期:2024-03-10 发布日期:2024-03-15

Mercury exposure and health risk assessment in typical lead-zinc mining areas and Guiyang City.

WANG Dawei1, KONG Lin2, XU Xiaohang1, HAN Jialiang1, LIU Jiemin3*, QIU Guangle1   

  1. (1State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Science, Guiyang 550081, China; 2School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China; 3Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China).

  • Online:2024-03-10 Published:2024-03-15

摘要: 选择贵州省赫章县铅锌矿区和贵阳市居民区,采集了居民日用食物(大米、土豆、鸡蛋、蔬菜、鱼肉、猪肉)、饮用水和农作物根际土壤,共计503个,测定了总汞和甲基汞的含量,并结合蒙特卡洛模拟评估了居民无机汞和甲基汞暴露风险。结果如下:(1)铅锌矿区的样品总汞和甲基汞的范围分别为0.11~39和0.028~1.7 ng·g-1,城市居民区的样品总汞和甲基汞的范围分别为0.07~18和0.01~7.7 ng·g-1,除蔬菜外的样品总汞含量低于我国食品限量标准,蔬菜总汞含量分别有14.7%(铅锌矿区)和17.7%(城市居民区)的样品超过我国《食品安全国家标准》(GB 2672—2017)规定的10 ng·g-1。(2)两个地区无机汞日暴露量无差异(城市居民区:0.031 μg·kg-1·d-1,铅锌矿区:0.032 μg·kg-1·d-1),但城市居民区的甲基汞日暴露量(0.006 μg·kg-1·d-1)高出铅锌矿区(0.0032 μg·kg-1·d-1)近1倍。(3)两个地区居民无机汞和甲基汞的平均日暴露量分别低于联合国粮农组织/世界卫生组织食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)推荐的人体安全无机汞的临时容许每周摄入量(PTWI) 4 μg·kg-1·week-1和美国环境保护署(USEPA)推荐的甲基汞参考剂量(RfD) 0.1 μg·kg-1·d-1,暴露风险指数均小于1,表明处于健康安全水平。


关键词: 铅锌矿区, 贵阳市居民区, 无机汞, 甲基汞, 风险评估

Abstract: To assess food contamination levels of organic (MeHg) and inorganic mercury associated with mining and urban environments in Guizhou, we analyzed 503 samples from Hezhang County (lead-zinc mining area) and Guiyang. The health risk associated with dietary consumption was assessed using Monte Carlo simulations. The highest levels of total mercury were 39 and 18 ng·g-1 in the samples from the mining area and the urban residential area, respectively. The corresponding highest measurement values for MeHg were 1.7 and 7.7 ng·g-1, respectively. The investigated foodstuffs such as rice, potatoes, chicken eggs, fish, pork did not contain significant levels of mercury contamination, with the exception of certain vegetables that frequently showed levels above the current limit standard of 10 ng·g-1. 14.7% (lead/zinc mining area) and 17.7% (residential area) of vegetable samples exceeded the limit specified in China’s National Food Safety Standard (GB 2672-2017). Dietary inorganic mercury exposure was similar for food with different origins (residential area: 0.031 μg·kg-1·d-1, lead-zinc mining area: 0.032 μg·kg-1·d-1), while exposure to organic mercury was nearly twice greater in the urban environment (6.0 vs. 3.2 ng·kg-1·d-1). In general, the average daily exposure to inorganic mercury and MeHg was lower than the provisional weekly tolerable intake (PTWI) of 4 μg·kg-1·week-1 for IHg by WHO/JECFA and the reference dose (RfD) of 0.1 μg·kg-1·d-1 for MeHg established by USEPA, respectively. Hazard index in both regions was much less than unity, suggesting no obvious non-carcinogenic health risks.


Key words: lead-zinc mining area, Guiyang city, inorganic mercury, methylmercury, risk assessment