欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1650-1656.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202605.016

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

半干旱采煤沉陷生态修复区植被固碳量及其影响因素

杨永均1*,夏修文1,董婧1,唐佳佳1,郭洋楠2,雷少刚1,郭栋3
  

  1. 1中国矿业大学矿山生态修复教育部工程研究中心, 江苏徐州 221116; 2国能神东煤炭集团科技部, 陕西神木 719315; 3山东省采煤塌陷地和采空区治理工程研究中心, 济南 250104)
  • 出版日期:2026-05-10 发布日期:2026-05-08

Vegetation carbon sequestration and its influencing factors in semi-arid ecological restoration area after coal mining subsidence.

YANG Yongjun1*, XIA Xiuwen1, DONG Jing1, TANG Jiajia1, GUO Yangnan2, LEI Shaogang1, GUO Dong3   

  1. (1Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education for Mine Ecological Restoration, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China; 2Shendong Coal Group Technology Department, China Energy Group, Shenmu 719315, Shaanxi, China; 3Shandong Province Coal Mining Subsidence and Goaf Management Engineering Research Center, Jinan 250104, China).

  • Online:2026-05-10 Published:2026-05-08

摘要: 我国半干旱采煤沉陷区实施了大量生态修复工程,揭示生态修复区植被固碳量及其影响因素,对生态修复后植被管护及碳汇评估具有重要意义。本文以神东矿区大柳塔煤矿为研究区,利用地面调查和无人机遥感方法,建立植被固碳量测度模型,识别生态修复工程尺度上植被固碳量的主要影响因素。结果表明:(1)研究区人工修复植物群落固碳量平均达到13.70 t·hm-2,是原地貌植物群落的4.14倍。(2)冠层含水率、叶片氮磷比及植物配置是植被固碳量的主要影响因素,其中冠层含水率和叶片氮磷比与其他因素之间存在较强的交互作用,显著增强其他因素对植被固碳量的影响力。(3)地面曲率、植株密度和植物多样性与植被固碳量的关系存在阈值效应,负曲率凹状地形有利于植被固碳,而较低或过高的植株密度、中等水平的植物多样性均不利于植被固碳。(4)植物配置结构单一、氮磷营养元素缺乏、植株密度制约是生态修复区植被固碳增汇面临的主要生态风险。总体而言,半干旱采煤沉陷区具有较大的碳汇潜力,今后应加强生态修复后植被长期监测和适应性管护。该研究结果可以为煤矿区生态修复的合理实施和成效评价提供科学依据。


关键词: 生态修复, 无人机, 碳汇, 植被, 煤矿区

Abstract: A large number of ecological restoration projects have been implemented in the semi-arid coal mining subsidence areas in China. Revealing the carbon sequestration capacity and influencing factors of vegetation in ecological restoration areas is of great significance for vegetation management and carbon sequestration assessment. Using ground surveys and unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing methods, we established a model for measuring vegetation carbon sequestration in Daliuta Coal Mine in Shendong mining area and identified the main influencing factors at the scale of ecological restoration engineering. The results showed that: (1) The average carbon sequestration of restored vegetation reached 13.70 t·hm-2, which was 4.14 times that of the original landform plant community. (2) Canopy water content, leaf nitrogen/phosphorus ratio, and plant configuration were the main influencing factors of vegetation carbon sequestration. There was a strong interaction between canopy water content and leaf nitrogen/phosphorus ratio and other factors, which significantly enhanced the influence of other factors on vegetation carbon sequestration. (3) There were threshold effects in the relationships between ground curvature, plant density, and plant diversity and the carbon sequestration capacity of vegetation. Concave terrain with negative curvature was conducive to vegetation carbon sequestration, while lower or higher plant density and moderate levels of plant diversity were unfavorable to vegetation carbon sequestration. (4) The simple structure of plant configuration, low nutrient availability, and plant density constraints were the main ecological risks faced by vegetation carbon sequestration in this area. Overall, semi-arid coal mining subsidence areas have great potential for carbon sequestration. In the future, long-term monitoring and adaptive management of vegetation after ecological restoration should be strengthened. The results can provide scientific basis for the rational implementation and effectiveness evaluation of ecological restoration in coal mining areas.


Key words: ecological restoration, unmanned aerial vehicle, carbon sink, vegetation, coal mining area