欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是

生态学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1265-1272.doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202604.011

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同种养模式对水稻地上部生长特性及产量形成的影响

梁玉刚,匡炜,戴力,罗先富,赵杨*,方宝华*   

  1. (湖南杂交水稻研究中心, 长沙 410125)

  • 出版日期:2026-04-10 发布日期:2026-04-13

Effects of different cropping patterns on rice aboveground growth and yield formation.

LIANG Yugang, KUANG Wei, DAI Li, LUO Xianfu, ZHAO Yang*, FANG Baohua*   

  1. (Hunan Hybrid Rice Research Center, Changsha, 410125, China).

  • Online:2026-04-10 Published:2026-04-13

摘要: 为探究种养模式对水稻地上部生长特性及产量形成的影响,设置稻-油轮作、稻-冬闲和稻虾轮作模式的田间对比试验,研究了3种种养模式下的水稻(品种:黄华占和野香优莉丝)产量及产量构成、分蘖动态、干物质积累量、叶面积指数、叶片SPAD值和群体冠层光能截获量。结果表明:2年中稻-油轮作和稻-冬闲模式间的水稻产量及地上部生长特性均未达到显著性差异。与稻-油轮作模式相比,2年中稻-虾轮作模式下黄华占和野香优莉丝的产量降幅分别为15.5%~16.4%和14.4%~17.9%,且达到显著性差异;产量构成因素中的有效穗数和每穗粒数均呈显著降低趋势,水稻分蘖数、叶面积指数及茎、叶和穗干物质积累量也均呈显著降低趋势,其中稻-虾轮作模式下黄华占和野香优莉丝的茎干物质积累量降幅分别为13.5%~26.5%和9.9%~22.7%,叶干物质积累量降幅分别为8.4%~23.2%和7.4%~19.1%,穗干物质积累量降幅分别为13.0%~22.2%和16.8%~19.3%。2年中稻-虾轮作较稻-油轮作模式在水稻生长前期的倒2叶SPAD值处在较低水平,水稻群体冠层光能截获率也呈显著降低趋势,进而影响稻穗干物质量的积累和产量的形成。综上,稻-虾轮作模式将不利于水稻地上部群体生长和产量的形成。


关键词: 稻虾轮作, 水稻产量, 分蘖动态, 干物质积累量, 光能截获率

Abstract: We investigated the impacts of different cropping patterns on aboveground growth and yield formation of rice (cultivars Huanghuazhan and Yexiangyoulisi) in a two-year field experiment with three cropping patterns: rice-oilseed rotation, rice-winter fallow, and rice-shrimp rotation. Rice yield and its formations, tillering dynamics, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, leaf SPAD values, and canopy light interception were measured. The results showed that there were no significant differences in rice yield and aboveground growth characteristics between the rice-oilseed rotation and rice-winter fallow over two years. Compared with the rice-oilseed rotation, the rice-shrimp rotation significantly reduced the yields of rice cultivars Huanghuazhan and Yexiangyoulisi by 15.5%-16.4% and 14.4%-17.9%, respectively. The rice-shrimp rotation exhibited significant declines in effective panicle number, grains per panicle, tiller number, leaf area index, and dry matter accumulation in stems, leaves, and panicles. For Huanghuazhan and Yexiangyoulisi, dry matter accumulation in stems decreased by 13.5%-26.5% and 9.9%-22.7%, dry matter accumulation in leaves by 8.4%-23.2% and 7.4%-19.1%, and dry matter accumulation in panicles by 13.0%-22.2% and 16.8%-19.3%, respectively. Over the two years, SPAD values of the second uppermost leaves during the early growth periods were consistently lower in the rice-shrimp rotation compared to the rice-oilseed rotation. Canopy light interception showed a declining trend in the rice-shrimp rotation. These factors further affected dry matter accumulation in panicles and yield formation. In conclusion, the rice-shrimp rotation is not conducive to the aboveground population growth and the yield formation in rice.


Key words: rice-shrimp rotation, rice yield, tillering dynamics, dry matter accumulation, light interception rate